VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Warrington
dblp:207/8575
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 41% Deep learning architectures and training · 35% Reinforcement learning · 7% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequences · NeurIPS 2025 Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modeling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 On Nesting Monte Carlo Estimators · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
continuous-time sequence modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequences · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequences · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Scalable and Stable Parallelization of Nonlinear RNNs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modeling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
switching state-space model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Switching Autoregressive Low-rank Tensor Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Switching Autoregressive Low-rank Tensor Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Switching Autoregressive Low-rank Tensor Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted Objectives · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Asymmetric Learning in POMDPs · ICML 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Asymmetric Learning in POMDPs · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
monte carlo estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | On Nesting Monte Carlo Estimators · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
expert imitation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Asymmetric Learning in POMDPs · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Asymmetric Learning in POMDPs · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic jump differential equation · 0.9parallel scan · 0.9quasi-newton method · 0.8levenberg-marquardt algorithm · 0.8kalman smoothing · 0.8fixed-point iteration · 0.8switching linear dynamical system · 0.7exact inference · 0.7autoregressive hidden markov model · 0.7density ratio estimation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event SequencesabstractMarked temporal point processes (MTPPs) model sequences of events occurring at irregular time intervals, with wide-ranging applications in fields such as healthcare, finance and social networks. We propose the _state-space point process_ (S2P2) model, a novel and performant model that leverages techniques derived for modern deep state-space models (SSMs) to overcome limitations of existing MTPP models, while simultaneously imbuing strong inductive biases for continuous-time event sequences that other discrete sequence models (i.e., RNNs, transformers) do not capture. Inspired by the classical linear Hawkes processes, we propose an architecture that interleaves stochastic jump differential equations with nonlinearities to create a highly expressive intensity-based MTPP model, without the need for restrictive parametric assumptions for the intensity. Our approach enables efficient training and inference with a parallel scan, bringing linear complexity and sublinear scaling while retaining expressivity to MTPPs. Empirically, S2P2 achieves state-of-the-art predictive likelihoods across eight real-world datasets, delivering an average improvement of 33% over the best existing approaches. Yuxin Chang, Alex Boyd, Cao Xiao, Taha A. Kass-Hout, Parminder Bhatia, Padhraic Smyth, Andrew Warrington |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | Towards Scalable and Stable Parallelization of Nonlinear RNNsabstractTransformers and linear state space models can be evaluated in parallel on modern hardware, but evaluating nonlinear RNNs appears to be an inherently sequential problem. Recently, however, Lim et al. '24 developed an approach called DEER, which evaluates nonlinear RNNs in parallel by posing the states as the solution to a fixed-point problem. They derived a parallel form of Newton's method to solve the fixed-point problem and achieved significant speedups over sequential evaluation. However, the computational complexity of DEER is cubic in the state size, and the algorithm can suffer from numerical instability. We address these limitations with two novel contributions. To reduce the computational complexity, we apply quasi-Newton approximations and show they converge comparably to Newton, use less memory, and are faster. To stabilize DEER, we leverage a connection between the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and Kalman smoothing, which we call ELK. This connection allows us to stabilize Newton's method while using efficient parallelized Kalman smoothing algorithms to retain performance. Through several experiments, we show that these innovations allow for parallel evaluation of nonlinear RNNs at larger scales and with greater stability. Xavier Gonzalez, Andrew Warrington, Jimmy T. H. Smith, Scott W. Linderman |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modeling
Jimmy T. H. Smith, Andrew Warrington, Scott W. Linderman |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Switching Autoregressive Low-rank Tensor ModelsabstractAn important problem in time-series analysis is modeling systems with time-varying dynamics. Probabilistic models with joint continuous and discrete latent states offer interpretable, efficient, and experimentally useful descriptions of such data. Commonly used models include autoregressive hidden Markov models (ARHMMs) and switching linear dynamical systems (SLDSs), each with its own advantages and disadvantages. ARHMMs permit exact inference and easy parameter estimation, but are parameter intensive when modeling long dependencies, and hence are prone to overfitting. In contrast, SLDSs can capture long-range dependencies in a parameter efficient way through Markovian latent dynamics, but present an intractable likelihood and a challenging parameter estimation task. In this paper, we propose _switching autoregressive low-rank tensor_ SALT models, which retain the advantages of both approaches while ameliorating the weaknesses. SALT parameterizes the tensor of an ARHMM with a low-rank factorization to control the number of parameters and allow longer range dependencies without overfitting. We prove theoretical and discuss practical connections between SALT, linear dynamical systems, and SLDSs. We empirically demonstrate quantitative advantages of SALT models on a range of simulated and real prediction tasks, including behavioral and neural datasets. Furthermore, the learned low-rank tensor provides novel insights into temporal dependencies within each discrete state. Hyun Dong Lee, Andrew Warrington, Joshua I. Glaser, Scott W. Linderman |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | SIXO: Smoothing Inference with Twisted ObjectivesabstractSequential Monte Carlo (SMC) is an inference algorithm for state space models that approximates the posterior by sampling from a sequence of target distributions. The target distributions are often chosen to be the filtering distributions, but these ignore information from future observations, leading to practical and theoretical limitations in inference and model learning. We introduce SIXO, a method that instead learns target distributions that approximate the smoothing distributions, incorporating information from all observations. The key idea is to use density ratio estimation to fit functions that warp the filtering distributions into the smoothing distributions. We then use SMC with these learned targets to define a variational objective for model and proposal learning. SIXO yields provably tighter log marginal lower bounds and offers more accurate posterior inferences and parameter estimates in a variety of domains. Dieterich Lawson, Allan Raventós, Andrew Warrington, Scott W. Linderman |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Robust Asymmetric Learning in POMDPsabstractPolicies for partially observed Markov decision processes can be efficiently learned by imitating expert policies generated using asymmetric information. Unfortunately, existing approaches for this kind of imitation learning have a serious flaw: the expert does not know what the trainee cannot see, and as a result may encourage actions that are sub-optimal or unsafe under partial information. To address this issue, we derive an update which, when applied iteratively to an expert, maximizes the expected reward of the trainee’s policy. Using this update, we construct a computationally efficient algorithm, adaptive asymmetric DAgger (A2D), that jointly trains the expert and trainee policies. We then show that A2D allows the trainee to safely imitate the modified expert, and outperforms policies learned either by imitating a fixed expert or through direct reinforcement learning. Andrew Warrington, J. Wilder Lavington, Adam Scibior, Mark Schmidt 0001, Frank D. Wood |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Coping With Simulators That Don't Always ReturnabstractDeterministic models are approximations of reality that are easy to interpret and often easier to build than stochastic alternatives. Unfortunately, as nature is capricious, observational data can never be fully explained by deterministic models in practice. Observation and process noise need to be added to adapt deterministic models to behave stochastically, such that they are capable of explaining and extrapolating from noisy data. We investigate and address computational inefficiencies that arise from adding process noise to deterministic simulators that fail to return for certain inputs; a property we describe as ’brittle’. We show how to train a conditional normalizing flow to propose perturbations such that the simulator succeeds with high probability, increasing computational efficiency. Andrew Warrington, Frank D. Wood, Saeid Naderiparizi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | On Nesting Monte Carlo EstimatorsabstractMany problems in machine learning and statistics involve nested expectations and thus do not permit conventional Monte Carlo (MC) estimation. For such problems, one must nest estimators, such that terms in an outer estimator themselves involve calculation of a separate, nested, estimation. We investigate the statistical implications of nesting MC estimators, including cases of multiple levels of nesting, and establish the conditions under which they converge. We derive corresponding rates of convergence and provide empirical evidence that these rates are observed in practice. We further establish a number of pitfalls that can arise from naive nesting of MC estimators, provide guidelines about how these can be avoided, and lay out novel methods for reformulating certain classes of nested expectation problems into single expectations, leading to improved convergence rates. We demonstrate the applicability of our work by using our results to develop a new estimator for discrete Bayesian experimental design problems and derive error bounds for a class of variational objectives. Tom Rainforth, Robert Cornish, Hongseok Yang, Andrew Warrington |
ICML | 4 |