Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cyrus Mostajeran
dblp:207/9081
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Geometric Learning with Positively Decomposable Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
reproducing kernel hilbert space |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Geometric Learning with Positively Decomposable Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel theory
reproducing kernel krein space |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Geometric Learning with Positively Decomposable Kernels · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel methods · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Geometric Learning with Positively Decomposable KernelsabstractKernel methods are powerful tools in machine learning. Classical kernel methods are based on positive definite kernels, which enable learning in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). For non-Euclidean data spaces, positive definite kernels are difficult to come by. In this case, we propose the use of reproducing kernel Krein space (RKKS) based methods, which require only kernels that admit a positive decomposition. We show that one does not need to access this decomposition to learn in RKKS. We then investigate the conditions under which a kernel is positively decomposable. We show that invariant kernels admit a positive decomposition on homogeneous spaces under tractable regularity assumptions. This makes them much easier to construct than positive definite kernels, providing a route for learning with kernels for non-Euclidean data. By the same token, this provides theoretical foundations for RKKS-based methods in general. Nathaël Da Costa, Cyrus Mostajeran, Juan-Pablo Ortega, Salem Said |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Riemannian Statistics Meets Random Matrix Theory: Toward Learning From High-Dimensional Covariance MatricesabstractRiemannian Gaussian distributions were initially introduced as basic building blocks for learning models which aim to capture the intrinsic structure of statistical populations of positive-definite matrices (here called covariance matrices). While the potential applications of such models have attracted significant attention, a major obstacle still stands in the way of these applications: there seems to exist no practical method of computing the normalising factors associated with Riemannian Gaussian distributions on spaces of high-dimensional covariance matrices. The present paper shows that this missing method comes from an unexpected new connection with random matrix theory. Its main contribution is to prove that Riemannian Gaussian distributions of real, complex, or quaternion covariance matrices are equivalent to orthogonal, unitary, or symplectic log-normal matrix ensembles. This equivalence yields a highly efficient approximation of the normalising factors, in terms of a rather simple analytic expression. The error due to this approximation decreases like the inverse square of dimension. Numerical experiments are conducted which demonstrate how this new approximation can unlock the difficulties which have impeded applications to real-world datasets of high-dimensional covariance matrices. The paper then turns to Riemannian Gaussian distributions of block-Toeplitz covariance matrices. These are equivalent to yet another kind of random matrix ensembles, here called “acosh-normal” ensembles. Orthogonal and unitary “acosh-normal” ensembles correspond to the cases of block-Toeplitz with Toeplitz blocks, and block-Toeplitz (with general blocks) covariance matrices, respectively. Salem Said, Simon Heuveline, Cyrus Mostajeran |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |