Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zachary Brown 0001

dblp:208/0995-1 · also Zachary C. Brown · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 55% Trustworthy machine learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.912025
Generating Hypotheses of Dynamic Causal Graphs in Neuroscience: Leveraging Generative Factor Models of Observed Time Series · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
factor analysis
0.912025
Generating Hypotheses of Dynamic Causal Graphs in Neuroscience: Leveraging Generative Factor Models of Observed Time Series · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › representation engineering
activation editing
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.412020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural dynamics
0.312025
Generating Hypotheses of Dynamic Causal Graphs in Neuroscience: Leveraging Generative Factor Models of Observed Time Series · ICML 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience
0.312025
Generating Hypotheses of Dynamic Causal Graphs in Neuroscience: Leveraging Generative Factor Models of Observed Time Series · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.112020
Towards Neural Programming Interfaces · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear modeling · 1.7factor models · 0.9factor model · 0.9hidden activation manipulation · 0.4dataset construction · 0.4GAN-inspired loss · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generating Hypotheses of Dynamic Causal Graphs in Neuroscience: Leveraging Generative Factor Models of Observed Time Series
abstract
The field of hypothesis generation promises to reduce costs in neuroscience by narrowing the range of interventional studies needed to study various phenomena. Existing machine learning methods can generate scientific hypotheses from complex datasets, but many approaches assume causal relationships are static over time, limiting their applicability to systems with dynamic, state-dependent behavior, such as the brain. While some techniques attempt dynamic causal discovery through factor models, they often restrict relationships to linear patterns or impose other simplifying assumptions. We propose a novel method that models dynamic graphs as a conditionally weighted superposition of static graphs, where each static graph can capture nonlinear relationships. This approach enables the detection of complex, time-varying interactions between variables beyond linear limitations. Our method improves f1-scores of predicted dynamic causal patterns by roughly 22-28% on average over baselines in some of our experiments, with some improvements reaching well over 60%. A case study on real brain data demonstrates our method's ability to uncover relationships linked to specific behavioral states, offering valuable insights into neural dynamics.
Zachary Brown 0001
ICML1
2020 Towards Neural Programming Interfaces
abstract
It is notoriously difficult to control the behavior of artificial neural networks such as generative neural language models. We recast the problem of controlling natural language generation as that of learning to interface with a pretrained language model, just as Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) control the behavior of programs by altering hyperparameters. In this new paradigm, a specialized neural network (called a Neural Programming Interface or NPI) learns to interface with a pretrained language model by manipulating the hidden activations of the pretrained model to produce desired outputs. Importantly, no permanent changes are made to the weights of the original model, allowing us to re-purpose pretrained models for new tasks without overwriting any aspect of the language model. We also contribute a new data set construction algorithm and GAN-inspired loss function that allows us to train NPI models to control outputs of autoregressive transformers. In experiments against other state-of-the-art approaches, we demonstrate the efficacy of our methods using OpenAI’s GPT-2 model, successfully controlling noun selection, topic aversion, offensive speech filtering, and other aspects of language while largely maintaining the controlled model's fluency under deterministic settings.
Zachary Brown 0001, Nathaniel R. Robinson, David Wingate, Nancy Fulda
NeurIPS1