Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen L. Keeley
dblp:209/4855
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Multi-modal Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders for Neural and Behavioral Data · ICLR 2024 Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial Approximations · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.9 | 3 | 2024 | Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial Approximations · ICML 2020 Gaussian process based nonlinear latent structure discovery in multivariate spike train data · NIPS 2017 Multi-modal Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders for Neural and Behavioral Data · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
gaussian process factor analysis |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Identifying signal and noise structure in neural population activity with Gaussian process factor models · NeurIPS 2020 Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial Approximations · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Identifying signal and noise structure in neural population activity with Gaussian process factor models · NeurIPS 2020 Gaussian process based nonlinear latent structure discovery in multivariate spike train data · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial Approximations · ICML 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifying signal and noise structure in neural population activity with Gaussian process factor models · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifying signal and noise structure in neural population activity with Gaussian process factor models · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike train analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial Approximations · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent gaussian model
gaussian process latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Gaussian process based nonlinear latent structure discovery in multivariate spike train data · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 1.5gaussian process factor analysis · 1.5variational inference · 0.9poisson spiking model · 0.9orthogonal polynomial approximation · 0.9fourier-domain parameterization · 0.8fourier domain parameterization · 0.8black-box variational inference · 0.4black box variational inference · 0.4poisson likelihood · 0.3decoupled laplace approximation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Multi-modal Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders for Neural and Behavioral DataabstractCharacterizing the relationship between neural population activity and behavioral data is a central goal of neuroscience. While latent variable models (LVMs) are successful in describing high-dimensional data, they are typically only designed for a single type of data, making it difficult to identify structure shared across different experimental data modalities. Here, we address this shortcoming by proposing an unsupervised LVM which extracts shared and independent latents for distinct, simultaneously recorded experimental modalities. We do this by combining Gaussian Process Factor Analysis (GPFA), an interpretable LVM for neural spiking data with temporally smooth latent space, with Gaussian Process Variational Autoencoders (GP-VAEs), which similarly use a GP prior to characterize correlations in a latent space, but admit rich expressivity due to a deep neural network mapping to observations. We achieve interpretability in our model by partitioning latent variability into components that are either shared between or independent to each modality. We parameterize the latents of our model in the Fourier domain, and show improved latent identification using this approach over standard GP-VAE methods. We validate our model on simulated multi-modal data consisting of Poisson spike counts and MNIST images that scale and rotate smoothly over time. We show that the multi-modal GP-VAE (MM-GPVAE) is able to not only identify the shared and independent latent structure across modalities accurately, but provides good reconstructions of both images and neural rates on held-out trials. Finally, we demonstrate our framework on two real world multi-modal experimental settings: Drosophila whole-brain calcium imaging alongside tracked limb positions, and Manduca sexta spike train measurements from ten wing muscles as the animal tracks a visual stimulus. Rabia Gondur, Usama Bin Sikandar, Evan Schaffer, Mikio C. Aoi, Stephen L. Keeley |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2020 | Efficient Non-conjugate Gaussian Process Factor Models for Spike Count Data using Polynomial ApproximationsabstractGaussian Process Factor Analysis (GPFA) has been broadly applied to the problem of identifying smooth, low-dimensional temporal structure underlying large-scale neural recordings. However, spike trains are non-Gaussian, which motivates combining GPFA with discrete observation models for binned spike count data. The drawback to this approach is that GPFA priors are not conjugate to count model likelihoods, which makes inference challenging. Here we address this obstacle by introducing a fast, approximate inference method for non-conjugate GPFA models. Our approach uses orthogonal second-order polynomials to approximate the nonlinear terms in the non-conjugate log-likelihood, resulting in a method we refer to as polynomial approximate log-likelihood (PAL) estimators. This approximation allows for accurate closed-form evaluation of marginal likelihoods and fast numerical optimization for parameters and hyperparameters. We derive PAL estimators for GPFA models with binomial, Poisson, and negative binomial observations and find the PAL estimation is highly accurate, and achieves faster convergence times compared to existing state-of-the-art inference methods. We also find that PAL hyperparameters can provide sensible initialization for black box variational inference (BBVI), which improves BBVI accuracy. We demonstrate that PAL estimators achieve fast and accurate extraction of latent structure from multi-neuron spike train data. Stephen L. Keeley, David M. Zoltowski, Yiyi Yu, Spencer L. Smith, Jonathan W. Pillow |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Identifying signal and noise structure in neural population activity with Gaussian process factor modelsabstractNeural datasets often contain measurements of neural activity across multiple trials of a repeated stimulus or behavior. An important problem in the analysis of such datasets is to characterize systematic aspects of neural activity that carry information about the repeated stimulus or behavior of interest, which can be considered signal'', and to separate them from the trial-to-trial fluctuations in activity that are not time-locked to the stimulus, which for purposes of such analyses can be considerednoise''. Gaussian Process factor models provide a powerful tool for identifying shared structure in high-dimensional neural data. However, they have not yet been adapted to the problem of characterizing signal and noise in multi-trial datasets. Here we address this shortcoming by proposing ``signal-noise'' Poisson-spiking Gaussian Process Factor Analysis (SNP-GPFA), a flexible latent variable model that resolves signal and noise latent structure in neural population spiking activity. To learn the parameters of our model, we introduce a Fourier-domain black box variational inference method that quickly identifies smooth latent structure. The resulting model reliably uncovers latent signal and trial-to-trial noise-related fluctuations in large-scale recordings. We use this model to show that in monkey V1, noise fluctuations perturb neural activity within a subspace orthogonal to signal activity, suggesting that trial-by-trial noise does not interfere with signal representations. Finally, we extend the model to capture statistical dependencies across brain regions in multi-region data. We show that in mouse visual cortex, models with shared noise across brain regions out-perform models with independent per-region noise. Stephen L. Keeley, Mikio C. Aoi, Yiyi Yu, Spencer L. Smith, Jonathan W. Pillow |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Gaussian process based nonlinear latent structure discovery in multivariate spike train dataabstractA large body of recent work focuses on methods for extracting low-dimensional latent structure from multi-neuron spike train data. Most such methods employ either linear latent dynamics or linear mappings from latent space to log spike rates. Here we propose a doubly nonlinear latent variable model that can identify low-dimensional structure underlying apparently high-dimensional spike train data. We introduce the Poisson Gaussian-Process Latent Variable Model (P-GPLVM), which consists of Poisson spiking observations and two underlying Gaussian processes—one governing a temporal latent variable and another governing a set of nonlinear tuning curves. The use of nonlinear tuning curves enables discovery of low-dimensional latent structure even when spike responses exhibit high linear dimensionality (e.g., as found in hippocampal place cell codes). To learn the model from data, we introduce the decoupled Laplace approximation, a fast approximate inference method that allows us to efficiently optimize the latent path while marginalizing over tuning curves. We show that this method outperforms previous Laplace-approximation-based inference methods in both the speed of convergence and accuracy. We apply the model to spike trains recorded from hippocampal place cells and show that it compares favorably to a variety of previous methods for latent structure discovery, including variational auto-encoder (VAE) based methods that parametrize the nonlinear mapping from latent space to spike rates with a deep neural network. Anqi Wu, Nicholas A. Roy, Stephen L. Keeley, Jonathan W. Pillow |
NIPS | 3 |