VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mali Sundaresan
dblp:209/4859
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
brain network analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping distinct timescales of functional interactions among brain networks · NIPS 2017 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
functional brain connectivity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping distinct timescales of functional interactions among brain networks · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping distinct timescales of functional interactions among brain networks · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.3linear classifier · 0.3granger-geweke causality · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Mapping distinct timescales of functional interactions among brain networksabstractBrain processes occur at various timescales, ranging from milliseconds (neurons) to minutes and hours (behavior). Characterizing functional coupling among brain regions at these diverse timescales is key to understanding how the brain produces behavior. Here, we apply instantaneous and lag-based measures of conditional linear dependence, based on Granger-Geweke causality (GC), to infer network connections at distinct timescales from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Due to the slow sampling rate of fMRI, it is widely held that GC produces spurious and unreliable estimates of functional connectivity when applied to fMRI data. We challenge this claim with simulations and a novel machine learning approach. First, we show, with simulated fMRI data, that instantaneous and lag-based GC identify distinct timescales and complementary patterns of functional connectivity. Next, we analyze fMRI scans from 500 subjects and show that a linear classifier trained on either instantaneous or lag-based GC connectivity reliably distinguishes task versus rest brain states, with ~80-85% cross-validation accuracy. Importantly, instantaneous and lag-based GC exploit markedly different spatial and temporal patterns of connectivity to achieve robust classification. Our approach enables identifying functionally connected networks that operate at distinct timescales in the brain. Mali Sundaresan, Arshed Nabeel, D. Sridharan 0002 |
NIPS | 1 |