VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathon Byrd
dblp:209/4925
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 40% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › instance weighting
importance weighting |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning? · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning? · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph convolution
spatial graph convolution |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
protein interface prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph convolutional network · 0.6SVM · 0.6l2 regularization · 0.4importance weighting · 0.4dropout · 0.4batch normalization · 0.4SGD · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?abstractImportance-weighted risk minimization is a key ingredient in many machine learning algorithms for causal inference, domain adaptation, class imbalance, and off-policy reinforcement learning. While the effect of importance weighting is well-characterized for low-capacity misspecified models, little is known about how it impacts over-parameterized, deep neural networks. This work is inspired by recent theoretical results showing that on (linearly) separable data, deep linear networks optimized by SGD learn weight-agnostic solutions, prompting us to ask, for realistic deep networks, for which many practical datasets are separable, what is the effect of importance weighting? We present the surprising finding that while importance weighting impacts models early in training, its effect diminishes over successive epochs. Moreover, while L2 regularization and batch normalization (but not dropout), restore some of the impact of importance weighting, they express the effect via (seemingly) the wrong abstraction: why should practitioners tweak the L2 regularization, and by how much, to produce the correct weighting effect? Our experiments confirm these findings across a range of architectures and datasets. Jonathon Byrd, Zachary C. Lipton |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional NetworksabstractWe consider the prediction of interfaces between proteins, a challenging problem with important applications in drug discovery and design, and examine the performance of existing and newly proposed spatial graph convolution operators for this task. By performing convolution over a local neighborhood of a node of interest, we are able to stack multiple layers of convolution and learn effective latent representations that integrate information across the graph that represent the three dimensional structure of a protein of interest. An architecture that combines the learned features across pairs of proteins is then used to classify pairs of amino acid residues as part of an interface or not. In our experiments, several graph convolution operators yielded accuracy that is better than the state-of-the-art SVM method in this task. Alex Fout, Jonathon Byrd, Basir Shariat, Asa Ben-Hur |
NIPS | 2 |