Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minwei Ye
dblp:209/4945
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-5994-0529ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 56% Optimization for machine learning · 44% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › completion time minimization
makespan minimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchy-Based Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan under Precedence and Communication Constraints · SODA 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
precedence constrained scheduling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchy-Based Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan under Precedence and Communication Constraints · SODA 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
scheduling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchy-Based Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan under Precedence and Communication Constraints · SODA 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General · NIPS 2017 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General · NIPS 2017 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private optimization
private empirical risk minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General · NIPS 2017 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Hierarchy-Based Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan under Precedence and Communication Constraints · SODA 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
excess risk bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More General · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchy-based algorithms · 0.9approximation algorithm · 0.9polyak-lojasiewicz condition · 0.6differential privacy · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Hierarchy-Based Algorithms for Minimizing Makespan under Precedence and Communication ConstraintsabstractWe consider the classic problem of scheduling jobs with precedence constraints on a set of identical machines to minimize the makespan objective function. Understanding the exact approximability of the problem when the number of machines is a constant is a well-known question in scheduling theory. Indeed, an outstanding open problem from the classic book of Garey and Johnson [9] asks whether this problem is NP-hard even in the case of 3 machines and unit-length jobs. In a recent breakthrough, Levey and Rothvoss [24] gave a (1 + ϵ)-approximation algorithm, which runs in nearly quasi-polynomial time, for the case when job have unit lengths. However, a substantially more difficult case where jobs have arbitrary processing lengths has remained open. We make progress on this more general problem. We show that there exists a (1 + ϵ)-approximation algorithm (with similar running time as that of [24]) for the nonmigratory setting: when every job has to be scheduled entirely on a single machine, but within a machine the job need not be scheduled during consecutive time steps. Further, we also show that our algorithmic framework generalizes to another classic scenario where, along with the precedence constraints, the jobs also have communication delay constraints. Both of these fundamental problems are highly relevant to the practice of datacenter scheduling. Janardhan Kulkarni, Shi Li 0001, Jakub Tarnawski, Minwei Ye |
SODA | 4 |
| 2020 | Approximating Global Optimum for Probabilistic Truth Discovery
Shi Li 0001, Jinhui Xu 0001, Minwei Ye |
Algorithmica | 3 |
| 2018 | Approximating Global Optimum for Probabilistic Truth Discovery
Shi Li 0001, Jinhui Xu 0001, Minwei Ye |
COCOON | 3 |
| 2017 | Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More GeneralabstractIn this paper we study differentially private Empirical Risk Minimization(ERM) in different settings. For smooth (strongly) convex loss function with or without (non)-smooth regularization, we give algorithms which achieve either optimal or near optimal utility bound with less gradient complexity compared with previous work. For ERM with smooth convex loss function in high-dimension($p\gg n$) setting, we give an algorithm which achieves the upper bound with less gradient complexity than previous ones. At last, we generalize the expected excess empirical risk from convex to Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition and give a tighter upper bound of the utility comparing with the result in \cite{DBLP:journals/corr/ZhangZMW17}. Di Wang 0015, Minwei Ye, Jinhui Xu 0001 |
NIPS | 2 |