Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zachery Miranda
dblp:209/9654
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
constraint-based synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Selecting Representative Examples for Program Synthesis · ICML 2018 |
Program synthesis and code generation
programming by example |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Selecting Representative Examples for Program Synthesis · ICML 2018 |
Web and social media mining
web mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Beagle: Automated Extraction and Interpretation of Visualizations from the Web · CHI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automatic classification · 0.7SVG parsing · 0.7neural network · 0.3greedy selection · 0.3constraint solving · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Beagle: Automated Extraction and Interpretation of Visualizations from the Webabstract"How common is interactive visualization on the web?" "What is the most popular visualization design?" "How prevalent are pie charts really?" These questions intimate the role of interactive visualization in the real (online) world. In this paper, we present our approach (and findings) to answering these questions. First, we introduce Beagle, which mines the web for SVG-based visualizations and automatically classifies them by type (i.e., bar, pie, etc.). With Beagle, we extract over 41,000 visualizations across five different tools and repositories, and classify them with 85% accuracy, across 24 visualization types. Given this visualization collection, we study usage across tools. We find that most visualizations fall under four types: bar charts, line charts, scatter charts, and geographic maps. Though controversial, pie charts are relatively rare for the visualization tools that were studied. Our findings also suggest that the total visualization types supported by a given tool could factor into its ease of use. However this effect appears to be mitigated by providing a variety of diverse expert visualization examples to users. Leilani Battle, Peitong Duan, Zachery Miranda, Dana Mukusheva, Remco Chang, Michael Stonebraker |
CHI | 3 |
| 2018 | Selecting Representative Examples for Program SynthesisabstractProgram synthesis is a class of regression problems where one seeks a solution, in the form of a source-code program, mapping the inputs to their corresponding outputs exactly. Due to its precise and combinatorial nature, program synthesis is commonly formulated as a constraint satisfaction problem, where input-output examples are encoded as constraints and solved with a constraint solver. A key challenge of this formulation is scalability: while constraint solvers work well with a few well-chosen examples, a large set of examples can incur significant overhead in both time and memory. We describe a method to discover a subset of examples that is both small and representative: the subset is constructed iteratively, using a neural network to predict the probability of unchosen examples conditioned on the chosen examples in the subset, and greedily adding the least probable example. We empirically evaluate the representativeness of the subsets constructed by our method, and demonstrate such subsets can significantly improve synthesis time and stability. Yewen Pu, Zachery Miranda, Armando Solar-Lezama, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
ICML | 2 |