Abstract Program equivalence is the heart of reasoning about and proving properties of programs. To assert noninterference, for example, a program is shown to be equivalent to itself up to the confidentiality level of an observer. A powerful enabler for such proofs are logical relations , which, guided by the type structure, prescribe when two programs are indistinguishable. Logical relations enjoy ample exploration in functional languages, including languages with general recursion and a higher-order store—yet logical relations for session types only exist for terminating languages. This paper scales logical relations to general recursive session types. It develops a logical relation for progress-sensitive equivalence for intuitionistic linear logic session types , tackling the challenges non-termination and concurrency pose. In particular, the relation only equates a diverging program with another diverging one and accounts for nondeterminism of scheduling. The logical relation has two distinguishing characteristics: it is (i) indexed with an intuitionistic linear sequent , validating cut reductions and affording biorthogonal closure , and (ii) bound by an observation index , stratifying the logical relation in the presence of recursion. Biorthogonal closure validates the logical relation, proving that the induced equivalence is sound and complete with regard to closure of weak bisimilarity under parallel composition. Soundness guarantees that the equivalence has enough discriminatory power, completeness ensures that it is maximally permissive. The logical relation is then put to test on the example of noninterference.

Disentanglement is a runtime property of parallel programs guaranteeing that parallel tasks remain oblivious to each other’s allocations. As demonstrated in the MaPLe compiler and run-time system, disentanglement can be exploited for fast automatic memory management, especially task-local garbage collection with no synchronization between parallel tasks. However, as a low-level property, disentanglement can be difficult to reason about for programmers. The only means of statically verifying disentanglement so far has been DisLog, an Iris-fueled variant of separation logic, mechanized in the Rocq proof assistant. DisLog is a fully-featured program logic, allowing for proof of functional correctness as well as verification of disentanglement. Yet its employment requires significant expertise and per-program proof effort. This paper explores the route of automatic verification via a type system, ensuring that any well-typed program is disentangled and lifting the burden of carrying out manual proofs from the programmer. It contributes TypeDis, a type system inspired by region types, where each type is annotated with a timestamp, identifying the task that allocated it. TypeDis supports iso-recursive types as well as polymorphism over both types and timestamps. Crucially, timestamps are allowed to change during type-checking, at join points as well as via a form of subtyping, dubbed subtiming . The paper illustrates TypeDis and its features on a range of examples. The soundness of TypeDis and the examples are mechanized in the Rocq proof assistant, using an improved version of DisLog, dubbed DisLog2.

Many of today’s message-passing systems not only require messages to be exchanged in a certain order but also to happen at a certain time or within a certain time window . Such correctness conditions are particularly prominent in Internet of Things (IoT) and real-time systems applications, which interface with hardware devices that come with inherent timing constraints. Verifying compliance of such systems with the intended timed protocol is challenged by their heterogeneity —ruling out any verification method that relies on the system to be implemented in one common language, let alone in a high-level and typed programming language. To address this challenge, this paper contributes a logical relation to verify that its inhabitants (the applications and hardware devices to be proved correct) comply with the given timed protocol. To cater to the systems’ heterogeneity, the logical relation is entirely semantic , lifting the requirement that its inhabitants are syntactically well-typed. A semantic approach enables two modes of use of the logical relation for program verification: (i) once-and-for-all verification of an arbitrary well-typed application, given a type system, and (ii) per-instance verification of a specific application / hardware device ( a.k.a ., foreign code). To facilitate mode (i) , the paper develops a refinement type system for expressing timed message-passing protocols and proves that any well-typed program inhabits the logical relation (fundamental theorem). A type checker for the refinement type system has been implemented in Rust, using an SMT solver to check satisfiability of timing constraints. Then, the paper demonstrates both modes of use based on a small case study of a smart home system for monitoring air quality, consisting of a controller application and various environment sensors.

Protection of confidential data is an important security consideration of today's applications. Of particular concern is to guard against unintentional leakage to a (malicious) observer, who may interact with the program and draw inference from made observations. Information flow control (IFC) type systems address this concern by statically ruling out such leakage. This paper contributes an IFC type system for message-passing concurrent programs, the computational model of choice for many of today's applications such as cloud computing and IoT applications. Such applications typically either implicitly or explicitly codify protocols according to which message exchange must happen, and to statically ensure protocol safety, behavioral type systems such as session types can be used. This paper marries IFC with session typing and contributes over prior work in the following regards: (1) support of realistic cyclic process networks as opposed to the restriction to tree-shaped networks, (2) more permissive, yet entirely secure, IFC control, exploiting cyclic process networks, and (3) considering deadlocks as another form of side channel, and asserting deadlock-sensitive noninterference (DSNI) for well-typed programs. To prove DSNI, the paper develops a novel logical relation that accounts for cyclic process networks. The logical relation is rooted in linear logic, but drops the tree-topology restriction imposed by prior work.

Noninterference guarantees that an attacker cannot infer secrets by interacting with a program. Information flow control (IFC) type systems assert noninterference by tracking the level of information learned (pc) and disallowing communication to entities of lesser or unrelated level than the pc. Control flow constructs such as loops are at odds with this pattern because they necessitate downgrading the pc upon recursion to be practical. In a concurrent setting, however, downgrading is not generally safe. This paper utilizes session types to track the flow of information and contributes an IFC type system for message-passing concurrent processes that allows downgrading the pc upon recursion. To make downgrading safe, the paper introduces regrading policies. Regrading policies are expressed in terms of integrity labels, which are also key to safe composition of entities with different regrading policies. The paper develops the type system and proves progress-sensitive noninterference for well-typed processes, ruling out timing attacks that exploit the relative order of messages. The type system has been implemented in a type checker, which supports security-polymorphic processes.

Disentanglement is a run-time property of parallel programs that facilitates task-local reasoning about the memory footprint of parallel tasks. In particular, it ensures that a task does not access any memory locations allocated by another concurrently executing task. Disentanglement can be exploited, for example, to implement a high-performance parallel memory manager, such as in the MPL (MaPLe) compiler for Parallel ML. Prior research on disentanglement has focused on the design of optimizations, either trusting the programmer to provide a disentangled program or relying on runtime instrumentation for detecting and managing entanglement. This paper provides the first static approach to verify that a program is disentangled: it contributes DisLog, a concurrent separation logic for disentanglement. DisLog enriches concurrent separation logic with the notions necessary for reasoning about the fork-join structure of parallel programs, allowing the verification that memory accesses are effectively disentangled. A large class of programs, including race-free programs, exhibit memory access patterns that are disentangled "by construction". To reason about these patterns, the paper distills from DisLog an almost standard concurrent separation logic, called DisLog+. In this high-level logic, no specific reasoning about memory accesses is needed: functional correctness proofs entail disentanglement. The paper illustrates the use of DisLog and DisLog+ on a range of case studies, including two different implementations of parallel deduplication via concurrent hashing. All our results are mechanized in the Coq proof assistant using Iris.

Reasoning about concurrent programs is challenging, especially if data is shared among threads. Program correctness can be violated by the presence of data races—whose prevention has been a topic of concern both in research and in practice. The Rust programming language is a prime example, putting the slogan fearless concurrency in practice by not only employing an ownership-based type system for memory management, but also using its type system to enforce mutual exclusion on shared data. Locking, unfortunately, not only comes at the price of deadlocks but shared access to data may also cause memory leaks . This paper develops a theory of deadlock and leak freedom for higher-order locks in a shared memory concurrent setting. Higher-order locks allow sharing not only of basic values but also of other locks and channels, and are themselves first-class citizens. The theory is based on the notion of a sharing topology , administrating who is permitted to access shared data at what point in the program. The paper first develops higher-order locks for acyclic sharing topologies, instantiated in a λ-calculus with higher-order locks and message-passing concurrency. The paper then extends the calculus to support circular dependencies with dynamic lock orders, which we illustrate with a dynamic version of Dijkstra’s dining philosophers problem. Well-typed programs in the resulting calculi are shown to be free of deadlocks and memory leaks, with proofs mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.

Funding Information: Funding Stephanie Balzer: National Science Foundation Award No. CCF-1718267. Bernardo Toninho: FCT/MCTES grant NOVALINCS/BASE UIDB/04516/2020. Publisher Copyright: © Ruo Fei Chen, Stephanie Balzer, and Bernardo Toninho; licensed under Creative Commons License CC-BY 4.0

We introduce the notion of a connectivity graph —an abstract representation of the topology of concurrently interacting entities, which allows us to encapsulate generic principles of reasoning about deadlock freedom . Connectivity graphs are parametric in their vertices (representing entities like threads and channels) and their edges (representing references between entities) with labels (representing interaction protocols). We prove deadlock and memory leak freedom in the style of progress and preservation and use separation logic as a meta theoretic tool to treat connectivity graph edges and labels substructurally. To prove preservation locally, we distill generic separation logic rules for local graph transformations that preserve acyclicity of the connectivity graph. To prove global progress locally, we introduce a waiting induction principle for acyclic connectivity graphs. We mechanize our results in Coq, and instantiate our method with a higher-order binary session-typed language to obtain the first mechanized proof of deadlock and leak freedom.

Session types have recently been integrated with functional languages, bringing message-passing concurrency to functional programming. Channel endpoints then become first-class and can be stored in data structures, captured in closures, and sent along channels. Representatives of the GV (Wadler's "Good Variation") session type family are of particular appeal because they not only assert session fidelity but also deadlock freedom, inspired by a Curry-Howard correspondence to linear logic. A restriction of current versions of GV, however, is the focus on binary sessions, limiting concurrent interactions within a session to two participants. This paper introduces Multiparty GV (MPGV), a functional language with multiparty session types, allowing concurrent interactions among several participants. MPGV upholds the strong guarantees of its ancestor GV, including deadlock freedom, despite session interleaving and delegation. MPGV has a novel redirecting construct for modular programming with first-class endpoints, thanks to which we give a type-preserving translation from binary session types to MPGV to show that MPGV is strictly more general than binary GV. All results in this paper have been mechanized using the Coq proof assistant.

Programming digital contracts comes with unique challenges, which include (i) expressing and enforcing protocols of interaction, (ii) controlling resource usage, and (iii) preventing the duplication or deletion of a contract's assets. This article presents the design and type-theoretic foundation of Nomos, a programming language for digital contracts that addresses these challenges. To express and enforce protocols, Nomos is based on shared binary session types. To control resource usage, Nomos employs automatic amortized resource analysis. To prevent the duplication or deletion of assets, Nomos uses a linear type system. A monad integrates the effectful session-typed language with a general-purpose functional language. Nomos' prototype implementation features linear-time type checking and efficient type reconstruction that includes automatic inference of resource bounds via off-the-shelf linear optimization. The effectiveness of the language is evaluated with case studies on implementing common smart contracts such as auctions, elections, and currencies. Nomos is completely formalized, including the type system, a cost semantics, and a transactional semantics to deploy Nomos contracts on a blockchain. The type soundness proof ensures that protocols are followed at run-time and that types establish sound upper bounds on the resource consumption, ruling out re-entrancy and out-of-gas vulnerabilities.

Information flow control type systems statically restrict the propagation of sensitive data to ensure end-to-end confidentiality. The property to be shown is noninterference, asserting that an attacker cannot infer any secrets from made observations. Session types delimit the kinds of observations that can be made along a communication channel by imposing a protocol of message exchange. These protocols govern the exchange along a single channel and leave unconstrained the propagation along adjacent channels. This paper contributes an information flow control type system for linear session types. The type system stands in close correspondence with intuitionistic linear logic. Intuitionistic linear logic typing ensures that process configurations form a tree such that client processes are parent nodes and provider processes child nodes. To control the propagation of secret messages, the type system is enriched with secrecy levels and arranges these levels to be aligned with the configuration tree. Two levels are associated with every process: the maximal secrecy denoting the process' security clearance and the running secrecy denoting the highest level of secret information obtained so far. The computational semantics naturally stratifies process configurations such that higher-secrecy processes are parents of lower-secrecy ones, an invariant enforced by typing. Noninterference is stated in terms of a logical relation that is indexed by the secrecy-level-enriched session types. The logical relation contributes a novel development of logical relations for session typed languages as it considers open configurations, allowing for a more nuanced equivalence statement.

Shared session types generalize the Curry-Howard correspondence between intuitionistic linear logic and the session-typed $$\pi $$ -calculus with adjoint modalities that mediate between linear and shared session types, giving rise to a programming model where shared channels must be used according to a locking discipline of acquire-release. While this generalization greatly increases the range of programs that can be written, the gain in expressiveness comes at the cost of deadlock-freedom, a property which holds for many linear session type systems. In this paper, we develop a type system for logically-shared sessions in which types capture not only the interactive behavior of processes but also constrain the order of resources (i.e., shared processes) they may acquire. This type-level information is then used to rule out cyclic dependencies among acquires and synchronization points, resulting in a system that ensures deadlock-free communication for well-typed processes in the presence of shared sessions, higher-order channel passing, and recursive processes. We illustrate our approach on a series of examples, showing that it rules out deadlocks in circular networks of both shared and linear recursive processes, while still being permissive enough to type concurrent implementations of shared imperative data structures as processes.

In the simply-typed lambda-calculus we can recover the full range of expressiveness of the untyped lambda-calculus solely by adding a single recursive type U = U -> U. In contrast, in the session-typed pi-calculus, recursion alone is insufficient to recover the untyped pi-calculus, primarily due to linearity: each channel just has two unique endpoints. In this paper, we show that shared channels with a corresponding sharing semantics (based on the language SILL_S developed in prior work) are enough to embed the untyped asynchronous pi-calculus via a universal shared session type U_S. We show that our encoding of the asynchronous pi-calculus satisfies operational correspondence and preserves observable actions (i.e., processes are weakly bisimilar to their encoding). Moreover, we clarify the expressiveness of SILL_S by developing an operationally correct encoding of SILL_S in the asynchronous pi-calculus.

Session-typed languages building on the Curry-Howard isomorphism between linear logic and session-typed communication guarantee session fidelity and deadlock freedom. Unfortunately, these strong guarantees exclude many naturally occurring programming patterns pertaining to shared resources. In this paper, we introduce sharing into a session-typed language where types are stratified into linear and shared layers with modal operators connecting the layers. The resulting language retains session fidelity but not the absence of deadlocks, which can arise from contention for shared processes. We illustrate our language on various examples, such as the dining philosophers problem, and provide a translation of the untyped asynchronous π-calculus into our language.