Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Abhay Singh

dblp:21/10851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Learning paradigms · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.512021
Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models out-performs Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
label propagation
0.512021
Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models out-performs Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.512021
Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models out-performs Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › symmetry-aware learning
permutation invariance
0.412020
Better Set Representations For Relational Reasoning · NeurIPS 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning
0.412020
Better Set Representations For Relational Reasoning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › structured representation learning
set representation
0.412020
Better Set Representations For Relational Reasoning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

label propagation · 0.5feature propagation · 0.5synthetic image experiments · 0.4set refiner network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models out-performs Graph Neural Networks
Horace He, Abhay Singh, Ser-Nam Lim, Austin R. Benson
ICLR3
2020 Better Set Representations For Relational Reasoning
abstract
Incorporating relational reasoning into neural networks has greatly expanded their capabilities and scope. One defining trait of relational reasoning is that it operates on a set of entities, as opposed to standard vector representations. Existing end-to-end approaches for relational reasoning typically extract entities from inputs by directly interpreting the latent feature representations as a set. We show that these approaches do not respect set permutational invariance and thus have fundamental representational limitations. To resolve this limitation, we propose a simple and general network module called Set Refiner Network (SRN). We first use synthetic image experiments to demonstrate how our approach effectively decomposes objects without explicit supervision. Then, we insert our module into existing relational reasoning models and show that respecting set invariance leads to substantial gains in prediction performance and robustness on several relational reasoning tasks. Code can be found at github.com/CUAI/BetterSetRepresentations.
Horace He, Abhay Singh, Ser-Nam Lim, Austin R. Benson
NeurIPS3
2019 A Hierarchical Network for Diverse Trajectory Proposals
abstract
Autonomous explorative robots frequently encounter scenarios where multiple future trajectories can be pursued. Often these are cases with multiple paths around an obstacle or trajectory options towards various frontiers. Humans in such situations can inherently perceive and reason about the surrounding environment to identify several possibilities of either manoeuvring around the obstacles or moving towards various frontiers. In this work, we propose a 2 stage Convolutional Neural Network architecture which mimics such an ability to map the perceived surroundings to multiple trajectories that a robot can choose to traverse. The first stage is a Trajectory Proposal Network which suggests diverse regions in the environment which can be occupied in the future. The second stage is a Trajectory Sampling network which provides a finegrained trajectory over the regions proposed by Trajectory Proposal Network. We evaluate our framework in diverse and complicated real life settings. For the outdoor case, we use the KITTI dataset and our own outdoor driving dataset. In the indoor setting, we use an autonomous drone to navigate various scenarios and also a ground robot which can explore the environment using the trajectories proposed by our framework. Our experiments suggest that the framework is able to develop a semantic understanding of the obstacles, open regions and identify diverse trajectories that a robot can traverse. Our comparisons portray the performance gain of the proposed architecture over a diverse set of methods against which it is compared.
Sriram N. N., Gourav Kumar, Abhay Singh, M. Siva Karthik, Saket Saurav, Brojeshwar Bhowmick, K. Madhava Krishna
IV3
2010 Methodology for early and accurate test power estimation at RTL
abstract
Test power consumption impacts various aspects of an SOC design cycle ranging from packaging and power grid design to tester power supply requirements. Obtaining early and accurate test power estimates has so far been a bottleneck since design-for-test (DFT) modifications such as scan manifest only in the gate-level circuit representation. In this work, we describe a methodology that enables us to perform early and efficient power estimation for scan-based circuits at RTL. We explain the method, its realization using features of a commercial power estimation engine and its evaluation on various production 65nm and 45nm industrial designs.
Abhay Singh, Milan Shetty, Srivaths Ravi 0001, Ravindra Nibandhe
ITC1