Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Farshad Hakimpour

dblp:21/1813 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices › service discovery
semantic service matching
0.112006
Semantic WS-agreement partner selection · WWW 2006
Services computing and microservices
service level agreement
0.112006
Semantic WS-agreement partner selection · WWW 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.012006
Semantic WS-agreement partner selection · WWW 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
semantic web
0.012006
Semantic WS-agreement partner selection · WWW 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic web technologies · 0.1ontology matching · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Extraction of Usage Patterns for Land-Use Types by Pedestrian Trajectory Analysis
Mehdi Jalili, Farshad Hakimpour, Stefan Christiaan Van der Spek
W2GIS2
2007 Visualization of Events in a Spatially and Multimedia Enriched Virtual Environment
abstract
Semantic Event Tracker (SET) is a highly interactive visualization tool for tracking and associating activities (events) in a spatially and Multimedia Enriched Virtual Environment. SET provides integrated views of information spaces while providing overview and detail to improve perception and evaluation of complex scenarios. We model an event as an object that describes an action and its location, time, and relations to other objects. Real world event information is extracted from Internet sources, then stored and processed using Semantic Web technologies that enable us to discover semantic associations between events. We use RDF graphs to represent semantic metadata and ontologies. SET is capable of visualizing as well as navigating through the event data in all three aspects of space, time and theme.
Leonidas Deligiannidis, Farshad Hakimpour, Amit P. Sheth
ISI2
2007 SwetoDblp ontology of Computer Science publications
Boanerges Aleman-Meza, Farshad Hakimpour, Ismailcem Budak Arpinar, Amit P. Sheth
J. Web Semant.2
2006 Analyzing theme, space, and time: an ontology-based approach
abstract
The W3C's Semantic Web Activity is illustrating the use of semantics for information integration, search, and analysis. However, the majority of the work in this community has focused more on the thematic aspects of information and has paid less attention to its spatial and temporal dimensions. In this paper, we present an integrative ontology-based framework incorporating the thematic, spatial, and temporal dimensions of information. This framework is built around the RDF metadata model. Our ultimate goal is to provide an information system which allows searching and analysis of relationships in any or all of the three dimensions of space, time, and theme. Toward this end, we present an upper-level ontology combining concepts and relationships from both the thematic and spatial dimensions and show how to incorporate temporal semantics into this ontology. We also introduce the notion of a thematic context linking entities of differing dimensions and define a set of query operators built upon these contexts.
Matthew Perry, Farshad Hakimpour, Amit P. Sheth
GIS2
2006 Semantic WS-agreement partner selection
abstract
(Under the direction of Amit P. Sheth) In a dynamic service oriented environment it is desirable for service consumers and providers to offer and obtain guarantees regarding their capabilities and requirements. WS-Agreement defines a language and protocol for establishing agreements between two parties. The agreements are complex and expressive to the extent that the manual matching of these agreements would be expensive both in time and resources. It is essential to develop a method for matching agreements automatically. This work presents the framework and implementation of an innovative tool for the matching providers and consumers based on WS-Agreements. The approach utilizes Semantic Web technologies to achieve rich and accurate matches. A key feature is the novel and flexible approach for achieving user personalized matches.
Nicole Oldham, Kunal Verma, Amit P. Sheth, Farshad Hakimpour
WWW4
2003 Translating and Searching Service Descriptions Using Ontologies
Daniela Damm, Farshad Hakimpour, Andreas Geppert
CAiSE2
2003 Operators and Classification for Data Mapping in Semantic Integration
Anca Dobre, Farshad Hakimpour, Klaus R. Dittrich
ER2
2002 Global Schema Generation Using Formal Ontologies
Farshad Hakimpour, Andreas Geppert
ER1
2001 Resolving semantic heterogeneity in schema integration
abstract
Interoperability and integration of data sources are becoming ever more important issues as both, the amount of data and the number of data producers are growing. Interoperability not only has to resolve the differences in data structures, it also has to deal with semantic heterogeneity. Semantics refer to the meaning of data in contrast to syntax, which only defines the structure of the schema items (e.g., classes and attributes). We focus on the part of semantics related to the meanings of the terms used as identifiers in schema definitions. This paper presents an approach to integrate schemas from different communities, where each such community is using its own ontology. The approach is based on merging ontologies based on similarity relations among concepts of different ontologies. We present formal definitions of similarity relations based on intensional definitions and conclude the extensional consequences. The process of merging ontologies based on the detected similarity relations is discussed. The merged ontology is finally used to derive an integrated schema. The resulting schema can be used as the global schema in a federated database system.
Farshad Hakimpour, Andreas Geppert
FOIS1