Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Douglas A. Reynolds

dblp:21/2250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
104ranked-venue papers
21as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 90 · 18 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 57 · 9 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Speech recognition and synthesis · 93% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 7%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › speaker recognition
speaker verification
0.412020
Tandem Assessment of Spoofing Countermeasures and Automatic Speaker Verification: Fundamentals · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2020
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speaker recognition
0.242007
Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Conditions · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
Speaker Verification Using Support Vector Machines and High-Level Features · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
Phonetic Speaker Recognition with Support Vector Machines · NIPS 2003
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker verification
0.132007
Speaker Verification Using Support Vector Machines and High-Level Features · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
An overview of automatic speaker diarization systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Estimation of handset nonlinearity with application to speaker recognition · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2000
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
missing features
0.112007
Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Conditions · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
noise robustness
0.112007
Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Conditions · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speaker diarization
0.112006
An overview of automatic speaker diarization systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.012003
Phonetic Speaker Recognition with Support Vector Machines · NIPS 2003
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker identification
0.031995
Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1995
Integrated models of signal and background with application to speaker identification in noise · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1994
Experimental evaluation of features for robust speaker identification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1994
Audio and music processing › speech analysis
glottal source features
0.011999
Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999
Audio and music processing › speaker recognition
speaker identification
0.011999
Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999
Audio and music processing
speech processing
0.011999
Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1999
Biometric security
speaker verification
0.012007
Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Conditions · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2007
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
channel compensation
0.011994
Experimental evaluation of features for robust speaker identification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1994
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition › speaker identification
robust speaker identification
0.011994
Integrated models of signal and background with application to speaker identification in noise · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1994
Audio and music processing
noise compensation
0.011994
Integrated models of signal and background with application to speaker identification in noise · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.4risk-based assessment · 0.4multicondition training · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1gaussian mixture model · 0.1n-gram modeling · 0.1missing-feature theory · 0.1missing feature theory · 0.1log likelihood ratio kernel · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1term frequency analysis · 0.0likelihood score normalization · 0.0gradient descent · 0.0liljencrants-fant model · 0.0inverse filtering · 0.0parametric model integration · 0.0maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The 2022 NIST Language Recognition Evaluation
Yooyoung Lee, Craig S. Greenberg, Eliot Godard, Asad A. Butt, Elliot Singer, Lisa P. Mason, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH8
2020 Two decades of speaker recognition evaluation at the national institute of standards and technology
Craig S. Greenberg, Lisa P. Mason, Seyed Omid Sadjadi, Douglas A. Reynolds
Comput. Speech Lang.4
2020 Two decades into Speaker Recognition Evaluation - are we there yet?
Kong-Aik Lee, Seyed Omid Sadjadi, Haizhou Li 0001, Douglas A. Reynolds
Comput. Speech Lang.4
2020 Tandem Assessment of Spoofing Countermeasures and Automatic Speaker Verification: Fundamentals
abstract
Recent years have seen growing efforts to develop spoofing countermeasures (CMs) to protect automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems from being deceived by manipulated or artificial inputs. The reliability of spoofing CMs is typically gauged using the equal error rate (EER) metric. The primitive EER fails to reflect application requirements and the impact of spoofing and CMs upon ASV and its use as a primary metric in traditional ASV research has long been abandoned in favour of risk-based approaches to assessment. This paper presents several new extensions to the tandem detection cost function (t-DCF), a recent risk-based approach to assess the reliability of spoofing CMs deployed in tandem with an ASV system. Extensions include a simplified version of the t-DCF with fewer parameters, an analysis of a special case for a fixed ASV system, simulations which give original insights into its interpretation and new analyses using the ASVspoof 2019 database. It is hoped that adoption of the t-DCF for the CM assessment will help to foster closer collaboration between the anti-spoofing and ASV research communities.
Tomi Kinnunen, Héctor Delgado, Nicholas W. D. Evans, Kong-Aik Lee, Ville Vestman, Andreas Nautsch, Massimiliano Todisco, Xin Wang 0037, Md. Sahidullah, Junichi Yamagishi, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.11
2019 The 2018 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation
abstract
The 2021 Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE21) was the latest cycle of the ongoing evaluation series conducted by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) since 1996.It was the second large-scale multimodal speaker/person recognition evaluation organized by NIST (the first one being SRE19).Similar to SRE19, it featured two core evaluation tracks, namely audio and audio-visual, as well as an optional visual track.In addition to offering fixed and open training conditions, it also introduced new challenges for the community, thanks to a new multimodal (i.e., audio, video, and selfie images) and multilingual (i.e., with multilingual speakers) corpus, termed WeCanTalk, collected outside North America by the Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC).These challenges included: 1) trials (target and non-target) with enrollment and test segments originating from different domains (i.e., telephony versus video), and 2) trials (target and non-target) with enrollment and test segments spoken in different languages (i.e., cross-lingual trials).This paper presents an overview of SRE21 including the tasks, performance metric, data, evaluation protocol, results and system performance analyses.A total of 23 organizations (forming 15 teams) from academia and industry participated in SRE21 and submitted 158 valid system outputs.Evaluation results indicate: audio-visual fusion produce substantial gains in performance over audio-only or visual-only systems; top performing speaker and face recognition systems exhibited comparable performance under the matched domain conditions present in this evaluation; and, the use of complex neural network architectures (e.g., ResNet) along with angular losses with margin, data augmentation, as well as long duration fine-tuning contributed to notable performance improvements for the audioonly speaker recognition task.
Seyed Omid Sadjadi, Craig S. Greenberg, Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds, Lisa P. Mason, Jaime Hernandez-Cordero
INTERSPEECH4
2019 MCE 2018: The 1st Multi-Target Speaker Detection and Identification Challenge Evaluation
abstract
The Multi-target Challenge aims to assess how well current speech technology is able to determine whether or not a recorded utterance was spoken by one of a large number of blacklisted speakers. It is a form of multi-target speaker detection based on real-world telephone conversations. Data recordings are generated from call center customer-agent conversations. The task is to measure how accurately one can detect 1) whether a test recording is spoken by a blacklisted speaker, and 2) which specific blacklisted speaker was talking. This paper outlines the challenge and provides its baselines, results, and discussions.
Suwon Shon, Najim Dehak, Douglas A. Reynolds, James R. Glass
INTERSPEECH3
2018 Performance Analysis of the 2017 NIST Language Recognition Evaluation
Seyed Omid Sadjadi, Timothée Kheyrkhah, Craig S. Greenberg, Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds, Lisa P. Mason, Jaime Hernandez-Cordero
INTERSPEECH5
2017 Improving the Effectiveness of Speaker Verification Domain Adaptation with Inadequate In-Domain Data
abstract
Abstract : AbstractThis paper addresses speaker verification domain adaptationwith inadequate in-domain data. Specifically, we explore thecases where in-domain data sets do not include speaker labels,contain speakers with few samples, or contain speakers withlow channel diversity. Existing domain adaptation methods arereviewed, and their shortcomings are discussed. We derive anunsupervised version of fully Bayesian adaptation which reducesthe reliance on rich in-domain data. When applied todomain adaptation with inadequate in-domain data, the proposedapproach yields competitive results when the samples perspeaker are reduced, and outperforms existing supervised methodswhen the channel diversity is low, even without requiringspeaker labels. These results are validated on the NIST SRE16,which uses a highly inadequate in-domain data set.
Bengt J. Borgstrom, Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds, Seyed Omid Sadjadi
INTERSPEECH3
2017 The 2016 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation
abstract
The 2021 Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE21) was the latest cycle of the ongoing evaluation series conducted by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) since 1996.It was the second large-scale multimodal speaker/person recognition evaluation organized by NIST (the first one being SRE19).Similar to SRE19, it featured two core evaluation tracks, namely audio and audio-visual, as well as an optional visual track.In addition to offering fixed and open training conditions, it also introduced new challenges for the community, thanks to a new multimodal (i.e., audio, video, and selfie images) and multilingual (i.e., with multilingual speakers) corpus, termed WeCanTalk, collected outside North America by the Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC).These challenges included: 1) trials (target and non-target) with enrollment and test segments originating from different domains (i.e., telephony versus video), and 2) trials (target and non-target) with enrollment and test segments spoken in different languages (i.e., cross-lingual trials).This paper presents an overview of SRE21 including the tasks, performance metric, data, evaluation protocol, results and system performance analyses.A total of 23 organizations (forming 15 teams) from academia and industry participated in SRE21 and submitted 158 valid system outputs.Evaluation results indicate: audio-visual fusion produce substantial gains in performance over audio-only or visual-only systems; top performing speaker and face recognition systems exhibited comparable performance under the matched domain conditions present in this evaluation; and, the use of complex neural network architectures (e.g., ResNet) along with angular losses with margin, data augmentation, as well as long duration fine-tuning contributed to notable performance improvements for the audioonly speaker recognition task.
Seyed Omid Sadjadi, Timothée Kheyrkhah, Audrey Tong, Craig S. Greenberg, Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Lisa P. Mason, Jaime Hernandez-Cordero
INTERSPEECH5
2016 Speaker Recognition Using Real vs Synthetic Parallel Data for DNN Channel Compensation
abstract
Abstract : The effective use of synthetic multi-channel data for training denoising DNNs has been demonstrated for several speech technologies such as ASR and speaker recognition. This paper compares the use of real and synthetic data for training denoising DNNs for multi-microphone speaker recognition. Large reductions in error rates (37% and 50% for the AVG and POOL EERs and 20% and 30% for the AVG and POOL min DCFs) are attained on Mixer 6 microphone data using Mixer 1 and 2 multi-microphone data to train a denoising DNN. Nearly the same reduction in error rate is realized using room impulse response and noise estimates (RIRs) derived from the Mixer 1and 2 data and applied to just the telephone channel. Applying RIRs from three publicly available databases used in the Kaldi Aspire evaluation system yields lower but significant reductions in error rate (16% and 34% relative improvement in AVG and POOL EER and 13% and 25% relative improvement in AVG and POOL min DCFs). In all cases, the telephone channel performance on SRE10 is improved by the denoising DNNs with the real Mixer 1 and 2 trained DNN reducing EER by 12% and min DCF by 8.9%.
Fred Richardson, Michael S. Brandstein, Jennifer Melot, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH4
2016 Data Selection for Within-Class Covariance Estimation
abstract
Abstract : Methods for performing channel and session compensation in conjunction with subspace techniques have been a focus of considerable study recently and have led to significant gains in speaker recognition performance. While developers have typically exploited the vast archive of speaker labeled data available from earlier NIST evaluations to train the within-class and across-class covariance matrices required by these techniques, little attention has been paid to the characteristics of the data required to perform the training efficiently. This paper focuses on within-class covariance normalization and shows that a reduction in training data requirements can be achieved by proper data selection. In particular, it is shown that the key variables are the total amount of data and the degree of handset variability, with total calls per handset playing a smaller role. The study offers insight into efficient within-class covariance matrix training data collection in real world applications.
Elliot Singer, Tyler Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2016 Results of The 2015 NIST Language Recognition Evaluation
Désiré Bansé, George R. Doddington, Craig S. Greenberg, Jaime Hernandez-Cordero, John M. Howard, Lisa P. Mason, Alvin F. Martin, Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Audrey Tong
INTERSPEECH9
2015 Analysis of the second phase of the 2013-2014 i-vector machine learning challenge
Désiré Bansé, George R. Doddington, Daniel Garcia-Romero, John J. Godfrey, Craig S. Greenberg, Jaime Hernandez-Cordero, John M. Howard, Alvin F. Martin, Lisa P. Mason, Alan McCree, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH11
2015 A unified deep neural network for speaker and language recognition
abstract
Learned feature representations and sub-phoneme posteriors from Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have been used separately to produce significant performance gains for speaker and language recognition tasks. In this work we show how these gains are possible using a single DNN for both speaker and language recognition. The unified DNN approach is shown to yield substantial performance improvements on the the 2013 Domain Adaptation Challenge speaker recognition task (55% reduction in EER for the out-of-domain condition) and on the NIST 2011 Language Recognition Evaluation (48% reduction in EER for the 30s test condition).
Fred Richardson, Douglas A. Reynolds, Najim Dehak
INTERSPEECH2
2015 Deep Neural Network Approaches to Speaker and Language Recognition
abstract
The impressive gains in performance obtained using deep neural networks (DNNs) for automatic speech recognition (ASR) have motivated the application of DNNs to other speech technologies such as speaker recognition (SR) and language recognition (LR). Prior work has shown performance gains for separate SR and LR tasks using DNNs for direct classification or for feature extraction. In this work we present the application of single DNN for both SR and LR using the 2013 Domain Adaptation Challenge speaker recognition (DAC13) and the NIST 2011 language recognition evaluation (LRE11) benchmarks. Using a single DNN trained for ASR on Switchboard data we demonstrate large gains on performance in both benchmarks: a 55% reduction in EER for the DAC13 out-of-domain condition and a 48% reduction in Cavg on the LRE11 30 s test condition. It is also shown that further gains are possible using score or feature fusion leading to the possibility of a single i-vector extractor producing state-of-the-art SR and LR performance.
Fred Richardson, Douglas A. Reynolds, Najim Dehak
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.2
2015 Domain Mismatch Compensation for Speaker Recognition Using a Library of Whiteners
abstract
The development of the i-vector framework for generating low dimensional representations of speech utterances has led to considerable improvements in speaker recognition performance. Although these gains have been achieved in periodic National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) evaluations, the problem of domain mismatch, where the system development data and the application data are collected from different sources, remains a challenging one. The impact of domain mismatch was a focus of the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) 2013 speaker recognition workshop, where a domain adaptation challenge (DAC13) corpus was created to address this problem. This paper proposes an approach to domain mismatch compensation for applications where in-domain development data is assumed to be unavailable. The method is based on a generalization of data whitening used in association with i-vector length normalization and utilizes a library of whitening transforms trained at system development time using strictly out-of-domain data. The approach is evaluated on the 2013 domain adaptation challenge task and is shown to compare favorably to in-domain conventional whitening and to nuisance attribute projection (NAP) inter-dataset variability compensation.
Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.2
2014 Summary and initial results of the 2013-2014 speaker recognition i-vector machine learning challenge
abstract
During late-2013 through early-2014 NIST coordinated a special i-vector challenge based on data used in previous NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluations (SREs). Unlike evaluations in the SRE series, the i-vector challenge was run entirely online and used fixed-length feature vectors projected into a low-dimensional space (i-vectors) rather than audio recordings. These changes made the challenge more readily accessible, especially to participants from outside the audio processing field. Compared to the 2012 SRE, the i-vector challenge saw an increase in the number of participants by nearly a factor of two, and a two orders of magnitude increase in the number of systems submitted for evaluation. Initial results indicate the leading system achieved an approximate 37% improvement relative to the baseline system.
Désiré Bansé, George R. Doddington, Daniel Garcia-Romero, John J. Godfrey, Craig S. Greenberg, Alvin F. Martin, Alan McCree, Mark A. Przybocki, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH9
2013 Large-scale community detection on speaker content graphs
abstract
We consider the use of community detection algorithms to perform speaker clustering on content graphs built from large audio corpora. We survey the application of agglomerative hierarchical clustering, modularity optimization methods, and spectral clustering as well as two random walk algorithms: Markov clustering and Infomap. Our results on graphs built from the NIST 2005+2006 and 2008+2010 Speaker Recognition Evaluations (SREs) provide insight into both the structure of the speakers present in the data and the intricacies of the clustering methods. In particular, we introduce an additional parameter to Infomap that improves its clustering performance on all graphs. Lastly, we also develop an automatic technique to purify the neighbors of each node by pruning away unnecessary edges.
Stephen H. Shum, William M. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP3
2011 A channel-blind system for speaker verification
abstract
The majority of speaker verification systems proposed in the NIST speaker recognition evaluation are conditioned on the type of data to be processed: telephone or microphone. In this paper, we propose a new speaker verification system that can be applied to both types of data. This system, named blind system, is based on an extension of the total variability framework. Recognition results with the pro posed channel-independent system are comparable to state of the art systems that require conditioning on the channel type. Another ad vantage of our proposed system is that it allows for combining data from multiple channels in the same visualization in order to explore the effects of different microphones and collection environments.
Najim Dehak, Zahi N. Karam, Douglas A. Reynolds, Réda Dehak, William M. Campbell, James R. Glass
ICASSP3
2011 The MIT LL 2010 speaker recognition evaluation system: Scalable language-independent speaker recognition
abstract
Research in the speaker recognition community has continued to ad dress methods of mitigating variational nuisances. Telephone and auxiliary-microphone recorded speech emphasize the need for a ro bust way of dealing with unwanted variation. The design of recent 2010 NIST-SRE Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE) reflects this research emphasis. In this paper, we present the MIT submission applied to the tasks of the 2010 NIST-SRE with two main goals- language-independent scalable modeling and robust nuisance mitigation. For modeling, exclusive use of inner product-based and cepstral systems produced a language-independent computationally scalable system. For robustness, systems that captured spectral and prosodic information, modeled nuisance subspaces using multiple novel methods, and fused scores of multiple systems were implemented. The performance of the system is presented on a subset of the NIST SRE 2010 core tasks.
Douglas E. Sturim, William M. Campbell, Najim Dehak, Zahi N. Karam, Alan McCree, Douglas A. Reynolds, Fred Richardson, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Stephen H. Shum
ICASSP6
2011 Language Recognition via i-vectors and Dimensionality Reduction
abstract
In this paper, a new language identification system is presented based on the total variability approach previously developed in the field of speaker identification. Various techniques are em-ployed to extract the most salient features in the lower dimen-sional i-vector space and the system developed results in excel-lent performance on the 2009 LRE evaluation set without the need for any post-processing or backend techniques. Additional performance gains are observed when the system is combined with other acoustic systems.
Najim Dehak, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Douglas A. Reynolds, Réda Dehak
INTERSPEECH3
2011 A New Perspective on GMM Subspace Compensation Based on PPCA and Wiener Filtering
abstract
Abstract : We present a new perspective on the subspace compensation techniques that currently dominate the field of speaker recognition using Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs). Rather than the traditional factor analysis approach, we use Gaussian modeling in the sufficient statistic supervector space combined with Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis (PPCA) within-class and shared across class covariance matrices to derive a family of training and testing algorithms. Key to this analysis is the use of two noise terms for each speech cut: a random channel offset and a length dependent observation noise. Using the Wiener filtering perspective, formulas for optimal train and test algorithms for Joint Factor Analysis (JFA) are simple to derive. In addition, we can show that an alternative form of Wiener filtering results in the i-vector approach. thus tying together these two disparate techniques.
Alan McCree, Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2011 Exploiting Intra-Conversation Variability for Speaker Diarization
abstract
In this paper, we propose a new approach to speaker diariza-tion based on the Total Variability approach to speaker verifica-tion. Drawing on previous work done in applying factor anal-ysis priors to the diarization problem, we arrive at a simplified approach that exploits intra-conversation variability in the To-tal Variability space through the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Using our proposed methods, we demonstrate the ability to achieve state-of-the-art performance (0.9 % DER) in the diarization of summed-channel telephone data from the NIST 2008 SRE.
Stephen H. Shum, Najim Dehak, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich, Douglas A. Reynolds, James R. Glass
INTERSPEECH4
2010 The MITLL NIST LRE 2009 language recognition system
abstract
This paper presents a description of the MIT Lincoln Laboratory language recognition system submitted to the NIST 2009 Language Recognition Evaluation (LRE). This system consists of a fusion of three core recognizers, two based on spectral similarity and one based on tokenization. The 2009 LRE differed from previous ones in that test data included narrowband segments from worldwide Voice of America broadcasts as well as conventional recorded conversational telephone speech. Results are presented for the 23-language closed-set and open-set detection tasks at the 30, 10, and 3 second durations along with a discussion of the language-pair task. On the 30 second 23-language closed set detection task, the system achieved a 1.64 average error rate.
Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Elliot Singer, Terry P. Gleason, Alan McCree, Douglas A. Reynolds, Fred Richardson, Douglas E. Sturim
ICASSP5
2009 A study of new approaches to speaker diarization
abstract
This paper reports on work carried out at the 2008 JHU Summer Workshop examining new approaches to speaker diarization. Four different systems were developed and experiments were conducted using summed-channel telephone data from the 2008 NIST SRE. The systems are a baseline agglomerative clustering system, a new Variational Bayes system using eigenvoice speaker models, a streaming system using a mix of low dimensional speaker factors and classic segmentation and clustering, and a new hybrid system combining the baseline system with a new cosine-distance speaker factor clustering. Results are presented using the Diarization Error Rate as well as by the EER when using diarization outputs for a speaker detection task. The best configurations of the diarization system produced DERs of 3.5-4.6% and we demonstrate a weak correlation of EER and DER,
Douglas A. Reynolds, Patrick Kenny, Fabio Castaldo
INTERSPEECH1
2009 The MIT lincoln laboratory 2008 speaker recognition system
abstract
In recent years methods for modeling and mitigating variational nuisances have been introduced and refined. A primary emphasis in this years NIST 2008 Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE) was to greatly expand the use of auxiliary microphones. This offered the additional channel variations which has been a historical challenge to speaker verification systems. In this paper we present the MIT Lincoln Laboratory Speaker Recognition system applied to the task in the NIST 2008 SRE. Our approach during the evaluation was two-fold: 1) Utilize recent advances in variational nuisance modeling (latent factor analysis and nuisance attribute projection) to allow our spectral speaker verification systems to better compensate for the channel variation introduced, and 2) fuse systems targeting the different linguistic tiers of information, high and low. The performance of the system is presented when applied on a NIST 2008 SRE task. Post evaluation analysis is conducted on the sub-task when interview microphones are present.
Douglas E. Sturim, William M. Campbell, Zahi N. Karam, Douglas A. Reynolds, Fred Richardson
INTERSPEECH4
2008 Improved GMM-based language recognition using constrained MLLR transforms
abstract
In this paper we describe the application of a feature-space transform based on constrained maximum likelihood linear regression for unsupervised compensation of channel and speaker variability to the language recognition problem. We show that use of such transforms can improve baseline GMM-based language recognition performance on the 2005 NIST Language Recognition Evaluation (LRE05) task by 38%. Furthermore, gains from CMLLR are additive with other modeling enhancements such as vocal tract length normalization (VTLN). Further improvement is obtained using discriminative training, and it is shown that a system using only CMLLR adaption produces state-of-the-art accuracy with decreased test-time computational cost than systems using VTLN.
Wade Shen, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP2
2008 A comparison of subspace feature-domain methods for language recognition
abstract
Compensation of cepstral features for mismatch due to dissimilar train and test conditions has been critical for good performance in many speech applications. Mismatch is typically due to variability from changes in speaker, channel, gender, and environment. Common methods for compensation include RASTA, mean and variance normalization, VTLN, and feature warping. Recently, a new class of subspace methods for model compensation have become popular in language and speaker recognition—nuisance attribute projection (NAP) and factor analysis. A feature space version of latent factor analysis has been proposed. In this work, a feature space version of NAP is presented. This new approach, fNAP, is contrasted with feature domain latent factor analysis (fLFA). Both of these methods are applied to a NIST language recognition task. Results show the viability of the new fNAP method. Also, results indicate when the different methods perform best. Index Terms: language recognition, feature compensation, support vector machines 1.
William M. Campbell, Douglas E. Sturim, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH4
2008 Beyond frame independence: parametric modelling of time duration in speaker and language recognition
Alan McCree, Fred Richardson, Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH4
2008 Dialect recognition using adapted phonetic models
abstract
In this paper, we introduce a dialect recognition method that makes use of phonetic models adapted per dialect without phonetically labeled data. We show that this method can be implemented efficiently within an existing PRLM[1] system. We compare the performance of this system with other state-of-theart dialect recognition methods (both acoustic and token-based) on the NIST LRE 2007 English and Mandarin dialect recognition tasks. Our experimental results indicate that this system can perform better than baseline GMM and adapted PRLM systems, and also results in consistent gains of 15-23% when combined with other systems.
Wade Shen, Nancy F. Chen, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2008 The MITLL NIST LRE 2007 language recognition system
abstract
This paper presents a description of the MIT Lincoln Laboratory language recognition system submitted to the NIST 2007 Language Recognition Evaluation. This system consists of a fusion of four core recognizers, two based on tokenization and two based on spectral similarity. Results for NIST’s 14-language detection task are presented for both the closed-set and open-set tasks and for the 30, 10 and 3 second durations. On the 30 second 14-language closed set detection task, the system achieves a 1% equal error rate.
Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Elliot Singer, William M. Campbell, Terry P. Gleason, Alan McCree, Douglas A. Reynolds, Fred Richardson, Wade Shen, Douglas E. Sturim
INTERSPEECH6
2008 Eigen-channel compensation and discriminatively trained Gaussian mixture models for dialect and accent recognition
Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds, Alan McCree
INTERSPEECH3
2007 Language Recognition with Word Lattices and Support Vector Machines
abstract
Language recognition is typically performed with methods that exploit phonotactics - a phone recognition language modeling (PRLM) system. A PRLM system converts speech to a lattice of phones and then scores a language model. A standard extension to this scheme is to use multiple parallel phone recognizers (PPRLM). In this paper, we modify this approach in two distinct ways. First, we replace the phone tokenizer by a powerful speech-to-text system. Second, we use a discriminative support vector machine for language modeling. Our goals are twofold. First, we explore the ability of a single speech-to-text system to distinguish multiple languages. Second, we fuse the new system with an SVM PRLM system to see if it complements current approaches. Experiments on the 2005 NIST language recognition corpus show the new word system accomplishes these goals and has significant potential for language recognition.
William M. Campbell, Fred Richardson, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP (4)3
2007 The MIT-LL/IBM 2006 Speaker Recognition System: High-Performance Reduced-Complexity Recognition
abstract
Many powerful methods for speaker recognition have been introduced in recent years - high-level features, novel classifiers, and channel compensation methods. A common arena for evaluating these methods has been the NIST speaker recognition evaluation (SRE). In the NIST SRE from 2002-2005, a popular approach was to fuse multiple systems based upon cepstral features and different linguistic tiers of high-level features. With enough enrollment data, this approach produced dramatic error rate reductions and showed conceptually that better performance was attainable. A drawback in this approach is that many high-level systems were being run independently requiring significant computational complexity and resources. In 2006, MIT Lincoln Laboratory focused on a new system architecture which emphasized reduced complexity. This system was a carefully selected mixture of high-level techniques, new classifier methods, and novel channel compensation techniques. This new system has excellent accuracy and has substantially reduced complexity. The performance and computational aspects of the system are detailed on a NIST 2006 SRE task.
William M. Campbell, Douglas E. Sturim, Wade Shen, Douglas A. Reynolds, Jirí Navrátil 0001
ICASSP (4)4
2007 Triage Framework for Resource Conservation in a Speaker Identification System
abstract
We present a novel framework for triaging (prioritizing and discarding) data to conserve resources for a speaker identification (SID) system. Our work is motivated by applications that require a SID system to process an overwhelming volume of audio data. We design a triage filter whose goal is to conserve recognizer resources while preserving relevant content. We propose triage methods that use signal quality assessment tools, a scaled-down version of the main recognizer itself, and a fusion of these measures. We define a new precision-based measure of effectiveness for our triage framework. Our experimental results with the 35-speaker tactical SID corpus bear out the validity of our approach.
Arvind Jairam, Elliot Singer, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP (4)3
2007 Robust Speaker Recognition with Cross-Channel Data: MIT-LL Results on the 2006 NIST SRE Auxiliary Microphone Task
abstract
One particularly difficult challenge for cross-channel speaker verification is the auxiliary microphone task introduced in the 2005 and 2006 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluations, where training uses telephone speech and verification uses speech from multiple auxiliary microphones. This paper presents two approaches to compensate for the effects of auxiliary microphones on the speech signal. The first compensation method mitigates session effects through Latent Factor Analysis (LFA) and Nuisance Attribute Projection (NAP). The second approach operates directly on the recorded signal with noise reduction techniques. Results are presented that show a reduction in the performance gap between telephone and auxiliary microphone data.
Douglas E. Sturim, William M. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Robert B. Dunn, Thomas F. Quatieri
ICASSP (4)3
2007 Improving phonotactic language recognition with acoustic adaptation
abstract
In recent evaluations of automatic language recognition systems, phonotactic approaches have proven highly effective [1][2]. However, as most of these systems rely on underlying ASR techniques to derive a phonetic tokenization, these techniques are potentially susceptible to acoustic variability from non-language sources (i.e. gender, speaker, channel, etc.). In this paper we apply techniques from ASR research to normalize and adapt HMM-based phonetic models to improve phonotactic language recognition performance. Experiments we conducted with these techniques show an EER reduction of 29% over traditional PRLM-based approaches.
Wade Shen, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH2
2007 A comparison of speaker clustering and speech recognition techniques for air situational awareness
abstract
In this paper we compare speaker clustering and speech recognition techniques to the problem of understanding patterns of air traffic control communications. For a given radio transmission, our goal is to identify the talker and to whom he/she is speaking. This information, in combination with knowledge of the the roles (i.e. takeoff, approach, hand-off, taxi, etc.) of different radio frequencies within an air traffic control region could allow tracking of pilots through various stages of flight, thus providing the potential to monitor the airspace in great detail. Both techniques must contend with degraded audio channels and significant non-native accents. We report results from experiments using the nn-MATC database [6] showing 9.3 % and 32.6 % clustering error for speaker clustering and ASR methods respectively. Index Terms: speaker clustering, robust speech recognition, entity detection
Wade Shen, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH2
2007 Speaker Verification Using Support Vector Machines and High-Level Features
abstract
High-level characteristics such as word usage, pronunciation, phonotactics, prosody, etc., have seen a resurgence for automatic speaker recognition over the last several years. With the availability of many conversation sides per speaker in current corpora, high-level systems now have the amount of data needed to sufficiently characterize a speaker. Although a significant amount of work has been done in finding novel high-level features, less work has been done on modeling these features. We describe a method of speaker modeling based upon support vector machines. Current high-level feature extraction produces sequences or lattices of tokens for a given conversation side. These sequences can be converted to counts and then frequencies ofn-gram for a given conversation side. We use support vector machine modeling of these n-gram frequencies for speaker verification. We derive a new kernel based upon linearizing a log likelihood ratio scoring system. Generalizations of this method are shown to produce excellent results on a variety of high-level features. We demonstrate that our methods produce results significantly better than standard log-likelihood ratio modeling. We also demonstrate that our system can perform well in conjunction with standard cesptral speaker recognition systems.
William M. Campbell, Joseph P. Campbell, Terry P. Gleason, Douglas A. Reynolds, Wade Shen
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.4
2007 Robust Speaker Recognition in Noisy Conditions
abstract
This paper investigates the problem of speaker identification and verification in noisy conditions, assuming that speech signals are corrupted by environmental noise, but knowledge about the noise characteristics is not available. This research is motivated in part by the potential application of speaker recognition technologies on handheld devices or the Internet. While the technologies promise an additional biometric layer of security to protect the user, the practical implementation of such systems faces many challenges. One of these is environmental noise. Due to the mobile nature of such systems, the noise sources can be highly time-varying and potentially unknown. This raises the requirement for noise robustness in the absence of information about the noise. This paper describes a method that combines multicondition model training and missing-feature theory to model noise with unknown temporal-spectral characteristics. Multicondition training is conducted using simulated noisy data with limited noise variation, providing a ldquocoarserdquo compensation for the noise, and missing-feature theory is applied to refine the compensation by ignoring noise variation outside the given training conditions, thereby reducing the training and testing mismatch. This paper is focused on several issues relating to the implementation of the new model for real-world applications. These include the generation of multicondition training data to model noisy speech, the combination of different training data to optimize the recognition performance, and the reduction of the model's complexity. The new algorithm was tested using two databases with simulated and realistic noisy speech data. The first database is a redevelopment of the TIMIT database by rerecording the data in the presence of various noise types, used to test the model for speaker identification with a focus on the varieties of noise. The second database is a handheld-device database collected in realistic noisy conditions, used to further validate the model for real-world speaker verification. The new model is compared to baseline systems and is found to achieve lower error rates.
Ji Ming, Timothy J. Hazen, James R. Glass, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.4
2006 SVM Based Speaker Verification using a GMM Supervector Kernel and NAP Variability Compensation
abstract
Gaussian mixture models with universal backgrounds (UBMs) have become the standard method for speaker recognition. Typically, a speaker model is constructed by MAP adaptation of the means of the UBM. A GMM supervector is constructed by stacking the means of the adapted mixture components. A recent discovery is that latent factor analysis of this GMM supervector is an effective method for variability compensation. We consider this GMM supervector in the context of support vector machines. We construct a support vector machine kernel using the GMM supervector. We show similarities based on this kernel between the method of SVM nuisance attribute projection (NAP) and the recent results in latent factor analysis. Experiments on a NIST SRE 2005 corpus demonstrate the effectiveness of the new technique
William M. Campbell, Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds, Alex Solomonoff
ICASSP (1)3
2006 Missing feature theory with soft spectral subtraction for speaker verification
abstract
This paper considers the problem of training/testing mismatch in the context of speaker verification and, in particular, explores the application of missing feature theory in the case of additive white Gaussian noise corruption in testing. Missing feature theory allows for corrupted features to be removed from scoring, the initial step of which is the detection of these features. One method of detection, employing spectral subtraction, is studied in a controlled manner and it is shown that with missing feature compensation the resulting verification performance is improved as long as a minimum number of features remain. Finally, a blending of “soft ” spectral subtraction for noise mitigation and missing feature compensation is presented. The resulting performance improves on the constituent techniques alone, reducing the equal error rate by about 15 % over an SNR range of5-25dB. Index Terms: speaker verification, GMM, spectral subtraction, missing features.
Michael T. Padilla, Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2006 Support vector machines for speaker and language recognition
William M. Campbell, Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo
Comput. Speech Lang.3
2006 Support vector machines using GMM supervectors for speaker verification
abstract
Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) have proven extremely successful for text-independent speaker recognition. The standard training method for GMM models is to use MAP adaptation of the means of the mixture components based on speech from a target speaker. Recent methods in compensation for speaker and channel variability have proposed the idea of stacking the means of the GMM model to form a GMM mean supervector. We examine the idea of using the GMM supervector in a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. We propose two new SVM kernels based on distance metrics between GMM models. We show that these SVM kernels produce excellent classification accuracy in a NIST speaker recognition evaluation task.
William M. Campbell, Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.3
2006 An overview of automatic speaker diarization systems
abstract
Audio diarization is the process of annotating an input audio channel with information that attributes (possibly overlapping) temporal regions of signal energy to their specific sources. These sources can include particular speakers, music, background noise sources, and other signal source/channel characteristics. Diarization can be used for helping speech recognition, facilitating the searching and indexing of audio archives, and increasing the richness of automatic transcriptions, making them more readable. In this paper, we provide an overview of the approaches currently used in a key area of audio diarization, namely speaker diarization, and discuss their relative merits and limitations. Performances using the different techniques are compared within the framework of the speaker diarization task in the DARPA EARS Rich Transcription evaluations. We also look at how the techniques are being introduced into real broadcast news systems and their portability to other domains and tasks such as meetings and speaker verification
Sue Tranter, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.2
2005 Estimating and Evaluating Confidence for Forensic Speaker Recognition
abstract
Estimating and evaluating confidence has become a key aspect of the speaker recognition problem because of the increased use of this technology in forensic applications. We discuss evaluation measures for speaker recognition and some of their properties. We then propose a framework for confidence estimation based upon scores and meta-information, such as utterance duration, channel type, and SNR. The framework uses regression techniques with multilayer perceptrons to estimate confidence with a data-driven methodology. As an application, we show the use of the framework in a speaker comparison task drawn from the NIST 2000 evaluation. A relative comparison of different types of meta-information is given. We demonstrate that the new framework can give substantial improvements over standard distribution methods of estimating confidence.
William M. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Joseph P. Campbell, Kevin Brady 0001
ICASSP (1)2
2005 Measuring human readability of machine generated text: three case studies in speech recognition and machine translation
abstract
We present highlights from three experiments that test the readability of current state-of-the art system output from: (1) an automated English speech-to-text (SST) system; (2) a text-based Arabic-to-English machine translation (MT) system; and (3) an audio-based Arabic-to-English MT process. We measure readability in terms of reaction time and passage comprehension in each case, applying standard psycholinguistic testing procedures and a modified version of the standard defense language proficiency test for Arabic called the DLPT*. We learned that: (1) subjects are slowed down by about 25% when reading system STT output; (2) text-based MT systems enable an English speaker to pass Arabic Level 2 on the DLPT*; and (3) audio-based MT systems do not enable English speakers to pass Arabic Level 2. We intend for these generic measures of readability to predict performance of more application-specific tasks.
Douglas A. Jones, Edward Gibson, Wade Shen, Neil Granoien, Martha Herzog, Douglas A. Reynolds, Clifford J. Weinstein
ICASSP (5)6
2005 The 2004 MIT Lincoln Laboratory Speaker Recognition System
abstract
The MIT Lincoln Laboratory submission for the 2004 NIST speaker recognition evaluation (SRE) was built upon seven core systems using speaker information from short-term acoustics, pitch and duration prosodic behavior, and phoneme and word usage. These different levels of information were modeled and classified using Gaussian mixture models, support vector machines and N-gram language models and were combined using a single layer perceptron fuser. The 2004 SRE used a new multi-lingual, multi-channel speech corpus that provided a challenging speaker detection task for the above systems. We describe the core systems used and provide an overview of their performance on the 2004 SRE detection tasks.
Douglas A. Reynolds, William M. Campbell, Terry T. Gleason, Carl Quillen, Douglas E. Sturim, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, André Adami
ICASSP (1)1
2005 Approaches and applications of audio diarization
abstract
Audio diarization is the process of annotating an input audio channel with information that attributes (possibly overlapping) temporal regions of signal energy to their specific sources. These sources can include particular speakers, music, background noise sources, and other signal source/channel characteristics. Diarization has utility in making automatic transcripts more readable and in searching and indexing audio archives. In this paper, we provide an overview of current audio diarization approaches and discuss performance and potential applications. We outline the general framework of diarization systems and present the performance of current systems as measured in the DARPA EARS Rich Transcription Fall 2004 (RT-04F) speaker diarization evaluation. Lastly, we look at future challenges and directions for diarization research.
Douglas A. Reynolds, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo
ICASSP (5)1
2005 Speaker Adaptive Cohort Selection for Tnorm in Text-Independent Speaker Verification
abstract
We discuss an extension to the widely used score normalization technique of test normalization (Tnorm) for text-independent speaker verification. A new method of speaker adaptive-Tnorm that offers advantages over the standard Tnorm by adjusting the speaker set to the target model is presented. Examples of this improvement using the 2004 NIST SRE data are also presented.
Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP (1)2
2005 Two experiments comparing reading with listening for human processing of conversational telephone speech
abstract
We report on results of two experiments designed to compare subjects ’ ability to extract information from audio recordings of conversational telephone speech (CTS) with their ability to extract information from text transcripts of these conversations, with and without the ability to hear the audio recordings. Although progress in machine processing of CTS speech is well documented, human processing of these materials has not been as well studied. These experiments compare subject’s processing time and comprehension of widely-available CTS data in audio and written formats – one experiment involves careful reading and one involves visual scanning for information. We observed a very modest improvement using transcripts compared with the audio-only condition for the careful reading task (speed-up by a factor of 1.2) and a much more dramatic improvement using transcripts in the visual scanning task (speed-up by a factor of 2.9). The implications of the experiments are twofold: (1) we expect to see similar gains in human productivity for comparable applications outside the laboratory environment and (2) the gains can vary widely, depending on the specific tasks involved. 1.
Douglas A. Jones, Wade Shen, Elizabeth Shriberg, Andreas Stolcke, Teresa M. Kamm, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH6
2004 High-level speaker verification with support vector machines
abstract
Recently, high-level features such as word idiolect, pronunciation, phone usage, prosody, etc., have been successfully used in speaker verification. The benefit of these features was demonstrated in the NIST extended data task for speaker verification; with enough conversational data, a recognition system can become "familiar" with a speaker and achieve excellent accuracy. Typically, high-level-feature recognition systems produce a sequence of symbols from the acoustic signal and then perform recognition using the frequency and co-occurrence of symbols. We propose the use of support vector machines for performing the speaker verification task from these symbol frequencies. Support vector machines have been applied to text classification problems with much success. A potential difficulty in applying these methods is that standard text classification methods tend to "smooth" frequencies which could potentially degrade speaker verification. We derive a new kernel based upon standard log likelihood ratio scoring to address limitations of text classification methods. We show that our methods achieve significant gains over standard methods for processing high-level features.
William M. Campbell, Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Douglas A. Jones, Timothy R. Leek
ICASSP (1)3
2003 Modeling prosodic dynamics for speaker recognition
abstract
Most current state-of-the-art automatic speaker recognition systems extract speaker-dependent features by looking at short-term spectral information. This approach ignores long-term information that can convey supra-segmental information, such as prosodics and speaking style. We propose two approaches that use the fundamental frequency and energy trajectories to capture long-term information. The first approach uses bigram models to model the dynamics of the fundamental frequency and energy trajectories for each speaker. The second approach uses the fundamental frequency trajectories of a predefined set of words as the speaker templates and then, using dynamic time warping, computes the distance between the templates and the words from the test message. The results presented in this work are on Switchboard I using the NIST Extended Data evaluation design. We show that these approaches can achieve an equal error rate of 3.7%, which is a 77% relative improvement over a system based on short-term pitch and energy features alone.
André Adami, Radu Mihaescu, Douglas A. Reynolds, John J. Godfrey
ICASSP (4)3
2003 Combining cross-stream and time dimensions in phonetic speaker recognition
abstract
Recent studies show that phonetic sequences from multiple languages can provide effective features for speaker recognition. So far, only pronunciation dynamics in the time dimension, i.e., n-gram modeling on each of the phone sequences, have been examined. In the JHU 2002 Summer Workshop, we explored modeling the statistical pronunciation dynamics across streams in multiple languages (cross-stream dimension) as an additional component to the time dimension. We found that bigram modeling in the cross-stream dimension achieves improved performance over that in the time dimension on the NIST 2001 Speaker Recognition Evaluation Extended Data Task. Moreover, a linear combination of information from both dimensions at the score level further improves the performance, showing that the two dimensions contain complementary information.
Qin Jin, Jirí Navrátil 0001, Douglas A. Reynolds, Joseph P. Campbell, Walter D. Andrews, Joy S. Abramson
ICASSP (4)3
2003 Conditional pronunciation modeling in speaker detection
abstract
We present a conditional pronunciation modeling method for the speaker detection task that does not rely on acoustic vectors. Aiming at exploiting higher-level information carried by the speech signal, it uses time-aligned streams of phones and phonemes to model a speaker's specific pronunciation. Our system uses phonemes drawn from a lexicon of pronunciations of words recognized by an automatic speech recognition system to generate the phoneme stream and an open-loop phone recognizer to generate a phone stream. The phoneme and phone streams are aligned at the frame level and conditional probabilities of a phone, given a phoneme, are estimated using cooccurrence counts. A likelihood detector is then applied to these probabilities. Performance is measured using the NIST Extended Data paradigm and the Switchboard-I corpus. Using 8 training conversations for enrollment, a 2.1% equal error rate was achieved. Extensions and alternatives, as well as fusion experiments, are presented and discussed.
David Klusácek, Jirí Navrátil 0001, Douglas A. Reynolds, Joseph P. Campbell
ICASSP (4)3
2003 Using prosodic and conversational features for high-performance speaker recognition: report from JHU WS'02
abstract
While there has been a long tradition of research seeking to use prosodic features, especially pitch, in speaker recognition systems, results have generally been disappointing when such features are used in isolation and only modest improvements have been seen when used in conjunction with traditional cepstral GMM systems. In contrast, we report here on work from the JHU 2002 Summer Workshop exploring a range of prosodic features, using as testbed the 2001 NIST Extended Data task. We examined a variety of modeling techniques, such as n-gram models of turn-level prosodic features and simple vectors of summary statistics per conversation side scored by k/sup th/ nearest-neighbor classifiers. We found that purely prosodic models were able to achieve equal error rates of under 10%, and yielded significant gains when combined with more traditional systems. We also report on exploratory work on "conversational" features, capturing properties of the interaction across conversation sides, such as turn-taking patterns.
Barbara Peskin, Jirí Navrátil 0001, Joy S. Abramson, Douglas A. Jones, David Klusácek, Douglas A. Reynolds, Bing Xiang
ICASSP (4)6
2003 Channel robust speaker verification via feature mapping
abstract
In speaker recognition applications, channel variability is a major cause of errors. Techniques in the feature, model and score domains have been applied to mitigate channel effects. In this paper we present a new feature mapping technique that maps feature vectors into a channel independent space. The feature mapping learns mapping parameters from a set of channel-dependent models derived from a channel-independent model via MAP adaptation. The technique is developed primarily for speaker verification, but can be applied for feature normalization in speech recognition applications. Results are presented on NIST landline and cellular telephone speech corpora where it is shown that feature mapping provides significant performance improvements over baseline systems and similar performance to Hnorm and speaker-model-synthesis (SMS).
Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP (2)1
2003 The SuperSID project: exploiting high-level information for high-accuracy speaker recognition
abstract
The area of automatic speaker recognition has been dominated by systems using only short-term, low-level acoustic information, such as cepstral features. While these systems have indeed produced very low error rates, they ignore other levels of information beyond low-level acoustics that convey speaker information. Recently published work has shown examples that such high-level information can be used successfully in automatic speaker recognition systems and has the potential to improve accuracy and add robustness. For the 2002 JHU CLSP summer workshop, the SuperSID project (http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws2002/groups/supersid/) was undertaken to exploit these high-level information sources and dramatically increase speaker recognition accuracy on a defined NIST evaluation corpus and task. The paper provides an overview of the structure, data, task, tools, and accomplishments of this project. Wide ranging approaches using pronunciation models, prosodic dynamics, pitch and duration features, phone streams, and conversational interactions were explored and developed. We show how these novel features and classifiers indeed provide complementary information and can be fused together to drive down the equal error rate on the 2001 NIST extended data task to 0.2% - a 71% relative reduction in error over the previous state of the art.
Douglas A. Reynolds, Walter D. Andrews, Joseph P. Campbell, Jirí Navrátil 0001, Barbara Peskin, André Adami, Qin Jin, David Klusácek, Joy S. Abramson, Radu Mihaescu, John J. Godfrey, Douglas A. Jones, Bing Xiang
ICASSP (4)1
2003 Person authentication by voice: a need for caution
abstract
Because of recent events and as members of the scientific community working in the field of speech processing, we feel compelled to publicize our views concerning the possibility of identifying or authenticating a person from his or her voice. The need for a clear and common message was indeed shown by the diversity of information that has been circulating on this matter in the media and general public over the past year. In a press release initiated by the AFCP and further elaborated in collaboration with the SpLC ISCA-SIG, the two groups herein discuss and present a summary of the current state of scientific knowledge and technological development in the field of speaker recognition, in accessible wording for nonspecialists. Our main conclusion is that, despite the existence of technological solutions to some constrained applications, at the present time, there is no scientific process that enables one to uniquely characterize a person’s voice or to identify with absolute certainty an individual from his or her voice. 1.
Jean-François Bonastre, Frédéric Bimbot, Louis-Jean Boë, Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Ivan Magrin-Chagnolleau
INTERSPEECH5
2003 Fusing high- and low-level features for speaker recognition
abstract
The area of automatic speaker recognition has been dominated by systems using only short-term, low-level acoustic information, such as cepstral features. While these systems have produced low error rates, they ignore higher levels of information beyond low-level acoustics that convey speaker information. Recently published works have demonstrated that such high-level information can be used successfully in automatic speaker recognition systems by improving accuracy and potentially increasing robustness. Wide ranging high-levelfeature-based approaches using pronunciation models, prosodic dynamics, pitch gestures, phone streams, and conversational interactions were explored and developed under the SuperSID
Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Robert B. Dunn
INTERSPEECH2
2003 Integration of speaker recognition into conversational spoken dialogue systems
abstract
In this paper we examine the integration of speaker identification/verification technology into two dialogue systems developed at MIT: the Mercury air travel reservation system and the Orion task delegation system. These systems both utilize information collected from registered users that is useful in personalizing the system to specific users and that must be securely protected from imposters. Two speaker recognition systems, the MIT Lincoln Laboratory textindependent GMM based system and the MIT Laboratory for Computer Science text-constrained speaker-adaptive ASRbased system, are evaluated and compared within the context of these conversational systems. 1.
Timothy J. Hazen, Douglas A. Jones, Alex Park 0001, Linda C. Kukolich, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH5
2003 Measuring the readability of automatic speech-to-text transcripts
abstract
Abstract • This paper reports initial results from a novel psycholinguistic study that measures the readability of several types of speech transcripts. We define a four-part figure of merit to measure readability: accuracy of answers to comprehension questions, reaction-time for passage reading, reaction-time for question answering and a subjective rating of passage difficulty. We present results from an experiment with 28 test subjects reading transcripts in four experimental conditions. 1.
Douglas A. Jones, Florian Wolf 0003, Edward Gibson, Elliott Williams, Evelina Fedorenko, Douglas A. Reynolds, Marc A. Zissman
INTERSPEECH6
2003 Model compression for GMM based speaker recognition systems
abstract
For large-scale deployments of speaker verification systems models size can be an important issue for not only minimizing storage requirements but also reducing transfer time of models over networks. Model size is also critical for deployments to small, portable devices. In this paper we present a new model compression technique for Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based speaker recognition systems. For GMM systems using adaptation from a background model, the compression technique exploits the fact that speaker models are adapted from a single speaker- independent model and not all parameters need to be stored. We present results on the 2002 NIST speaker recognition evaluation cellular telephone corpus and show that the compression technique provides a good tradeoff of compression ratio to performance loss. We are able to achieve a 56:1 compression (624KB ∆ 11KB) with only a 3.2% relative increase in EER (9.1% ∆ 9.4%).
Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH1
2003 Acoustic, phonetic, and discriminative approaches to automatic language identification
abstract
Formal evaluations conducted by NIST in 1996 demonstrated that systems that used parallel banks of tokenizer-dependent language models produced the best language identification performance. Since that time, other approaches to language identification have been developed that match or surpass the performance of phone-based systems. This paper describes and evaluates three techniques that have been applied to the language identification problem: phone recognition, Gaussian mixture modeling, and support vector machine classification. A recognizer that fuses the scores of three systems that employ these techniques produces a 2.7 % equal error rate (EER) on the 1996 NIST evaluation set and a 2.8 % EER on the NIST 2003 primary condition evaluation set. An approach to dealing with the problem of out-of-set data is also discussed.
Elliot Singer, Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Terry P. Gleason, William M. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH5
2003 Automatic Speaker and Language Recognition
Douglas A. Reynolds, Marc A. Zissman
HLT-NAACL1
2003 Phonetic Speaker Recognition with Support Vector Machines
abstract
A recent area of significant progress in speaker recognition is the use of high level features—idiolect, phonetic relations, prosody, discourse structure, etc. A speaker not only has a distinctive acoustic sound but uses language in a characteristic manner. Large corpora of speech data available in recent years allow experimentation with long term statistics of phone patterns, word patterns, etc. of an individual. We propose the use of support vector machines and term frequency analysis of phone se- quences to model a given speaker. To this end, we explore techniques for text categorization applied to the problem. We derive a new kernel based upon a linearization of likelihood ratio scoring. We introduce a new phone-based SVM speaker recognition approach that halves the er- ror rate of conventional phone-based approaches.
William M. Campbell, Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds, Douglas A. Jones, Timothy R. Leek
NIPS3
2002 Speaker detection and tracking for telephone transactions
abstract
As ever greater numbers of telephone transactions are being conducted solely between a caller and an automated answering system, the need increases for software which can automatically identify and authenticate these callers without the need for an onerous speaker enrollment process. In this paper we introduce and investigate a novel speaker detection and tracking (SDT) technique, which dynamically merges the traditional enrollment and recognition phases of the static speaker recognition task. In this speaker recognition application, no prior speaker models exist and the goal is to detect and model new speakers as they call into the system while also recognizing utterances from previously modeled callers. New speakers are added to the enrolled set of speakers and speech from speakers in the currently enrolled set is used to update models. We describe a system based on a GMM speaker identification (SID) system and develop a new measure to evaluate the performance of the system on the SDT task. Results for both static, open-set detection and the SDT task are presented using a portion of the Switchboard corpus of telephone speech communications. Static open-set detection produces an equal error rate of about 5%. As expected, performance for SDT is quite varied, depending greatly on the speaker set and ordering of the test sequence. These initial results, however, are quite promising and point to potential areas in which to improve the system performance.
Jack McLaughlin, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP2
2002 An overview of automatic speaker recognition technology
abstract
In this paper we provide a brief overview of the area of speaker recognition, describing applications, underlying techniques and some indications of performance. Following this overview we will discuss some of the strengths and weaknesses of current speaker recognition technologies and outline some potential future trends in research, development and applications.
Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP1
2002 Speaker verification using text-constrained Gaussian Mixture Models
abstract
In this paper we present an approach to close the gap between text-dependent and text-independent speaker verification performance. Text-constrained GMM-UBM systems are created using word segmentations produced by a LVCSR system on conversational speech allowing the system to focus on speaker differences over a constrained set of acoustic units. Results on the 2001 NIST extended data task show this approach can be used to produce an equal error rate of < 1 %.
Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds, Robert B. Dunn, Thomas F. Quatieri
ICASSP2
2002 Language identification using Gaussian mixture model tokenization
abstract
Phone tokenization followed by n-gram language modeling has consistently provided good results for the task of language identification. In this paper, this technique is generalized by using Gaussian mixture models as the basis for tokenizing. Performance results are presented for a system employing a GMM tokenizer in conjunction with multiple language processing and score combination techniques. On the 1996 CallFriend LID evaluation set, a 12-way closed set error rate of 17% was obtained.
Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Douglas A. Reynolds, John R. Deller Jr.
ICASSP2
2002 Approaches to language identification using Gaussian mixture models and shifted delta cepstral features
abstract
Published results indicate that automatic language identification (LID) systems that rely on multiple-language phone recognition and n-gram language modeling produce the best performance in formal LID evaluations. By contrast, Gaussian mixture model (GMM) systems, which measure acoustic characteristics, are far more efficient computationally but have tended to provide inferior levels of performance. This paper describes two GMM-based approaches to language identification that use shifted delta cepstra (SDC) feature vectors to achieve LID performance comparable to that of the best phone-based systems. The approaches include both acoustic scoring and a recently developed GMM tokenization system that is based on a variation of phonetic recognition and language modeling. System performance is evaluated on both the CallFriend and OGI corpora. 1.
Pedro A. Torres-Carrasquillo, Elliot Singer, Mary A. Kohler, Richard J. Greene, Douglas A. Reynolds, John R. Deller Jr.
INTERSPEECH5
2001 Speaker indexing in large audio databases using anchor models
abstract
Introduces the technique of anchor modeling in the applications of speaker detection and speaker indexing. The anchor modeling algorithm is refined by pruning the number of models needed. The system is applied to the speaker detection problem where its performance is shown to fall short of the state-of-the-art Gaussian mixture model with universal background model (GMM-UBM) system. However, it is further shown that its computational efficiency lends itself to speaker indexing for searching large audio databases for desired speakers. Here, excessive computation may prohibit the use of the GMM-UBM recognition system. Finally, the paper presents a method for cascading anchor model and GMM-UBM detectors for speaker indexing. This approach benefits from the efficiency of anchor modeling and high accuracy of GMM-UBM recognition.
Douglas E. Sturim, Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Joseph P. Campbell
ICASSP2
2000 Speaker recognition using G.729 speech codec parameters
abstract
Experiments in Gaussian-mixture-model speaker recognition from mel-cepstra, derived from mel-filter bank energies (MFBs) of the G.729 codec all-pole spectral envelope, showed significant performance loss relative to the standard mel-cepstral coefficients of G.729 synthesized (coded) speech (Quatieri et al. 1999). In this paper, we investigate two approaches to recover speaker recognition performance from G.729 parameters. The first is a parametric approach that makes explicit use of G.729 parameters, rather than deriving cepstra from MFBs of an all-pole spectrum. Specifically, the G.729 LSFs are converted to "direct" cepstral coefficients for which there exists a one-to-one correspondence with the LSFs. The G.729 residual is also considered; in particular, appending G.729 pitch as a single parameter to the direct cepstral coefficients gives further performance gain. The second nonparametric approach uses the original MFB paradigm, but adds harmonic striations to the G.729 all-pole spectral envelope. Although obtaining considerable performance gains with these methods, we have yet to match the performance of G.729 synthesized speech, motivating the need for representing additional fine structure of the G.729 residual.
Thomas F. Quatieri, Robert B. Dunn, Douglas A. Reynolds, Joseph P. Campbell, Elliot Singer
ICASSP3
2000 Bootstrapping for speaker recognition
Walter D. Andrews, Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2000 On the influence of rate, pitch, and spectrum on automatic speaker recognition performance
Thomas F. Quatieri, Robert B. Dunn, Douglas A. Reynolds
INTERSPEECH3
2000 The lincoln speaker recognition system: NIST eval2000
Douglas A. Reynolds, Robert B. Dunn, Jack McLaughlin
INTERSPEECH1
2000 The NIST speaker recognition evaluation - Overview, methodology, systems, results, perspective
George R. Doddington, Mark A. Przybocki, Alvin F. Martin, Douglas A. Reynolds
Speech Commun.4
2000 Estimation of handset nonlinearity with application to speaker recognition
abstract
A method is described for estimating telephone handset nonlinearity by matching the spectral magnitude of the distorted signal to the output of a nonlinear channel model, driven by an undistorted reference. This "magnitude only" representation allows the model to directly match unwanted speech formants that arise over nonlinear channels and that are a potential source of degradation in speaker and speech recognition algorithms. As such, the method is particularly suited to algorithms that use only spectral magnitude information. The distortion model consists of a memoryless nonlinearity sandwiched between two finite-length linear filters. Nonlinearities considered include arbitrary finite-order polynomials and parametric sigmoidal functionals derived from a carbon-button handset model. Minimization of a mean-squared spectral magnitude distance with respect to model parameters relies on iterative estimation via a gradient descent technique. Initial work has demonstrated the importance of addressing handset nonlinearity, in addition to linear distortion, in speaker recognition over telephone channels. A nonlinear handset "mapping," applied to training or testing data to reduce mismatch between different types of handset microphone outputs, improves speaker verification performance relative to linear compensation only. Finally, a method is proposed to merge the mapper strategy with a method of likelihood score normalization (hnorm) for further mismatch reduction and speaker verification performance improvement.
Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds, Gerald C. O'Leary
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.2
1999 Corpora for the evaluation of speaker recognition systems
abstract
Using standard speech corpora for development and evaluation has proven to be very valuable in promoting progress in speech and speaker recognition research. In this paper, we present an overview of current publicly available corpora intended for speaker recognition research and evaluation. We outline the corpora's salient features with respect to their suitability for conducting speaker recognition experiments and evaluations. We hope to increase the awareness and use of these standard corpora and corresponding evaluation procedures throughout the speaker recognition community.
Joseph P. Campbell, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP2
1999 Automatic speaker clustering from multi-speaker utterances
abstract
Blind clustering of multi-person utterances by speaker is complicated by the fact that each utterance has at least two talkers. In the case of a two-person conversation, one can simply split each conversation into its respective speaker halves, but this introduces error which ultimately hurts clustering. We propose a clustering algorithm which is capable of associating each conversation with two clusters (and therefore two-speakers) obviating the need for splitting. Results are given for two speaker conversations culled from the Switchboard corpus, and comparisons are made to results obtained on single-speaker utterances. We conclude that although the approach is promising, our technique for computing inter-conversation similarities prior to clustering needs improvement.
Jack McLaughlin, Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Gerald C. O'Leary
ICASSP2
1999 Evaluation of confidence measures for language identification
abstract
In this paper we examine various ways to derive confidence measures for a language identification system [3], using phone recognition followed by language models, and describe the application of an evaluation metric [1] for measuring the “goodness” of the different confidence measures. Experiments are conducted on the 1996 NIST Language Identification Evaluation corpus (derived from the Callfriend corpus of conversational telephone speech). The system is trained on the NIST 96 development data and evaluated on the NIST 96 evaluation data. Results indicate that we are able to predict the performance of a system and quantitatively evaluate how well the prediction holds on new data.
Kay M. Berkling, Douglas A. Reynolds, Marc A. Zissman
EUROSPEECH2
1999 A study of computation speed-UPS of the GMM-UBM speaker recognition system
abstract
The discourse manager is the component of the TRIPS-98 system that maintains a list of candidate antecedents to be used for resolving anaphoric referring expressions. The model currently implemented in the system is a monologue-based model of context that has a variety of limitations. This paper discusses changes to the underlying model to make it handle a much broader range of referring expressions. Some of these changes have already been implemented in the system and some are the subject of a long-term project. INTRODUCTION The TRIPS98 system, developed at the University of Rochester, is a collaborative planning assistance that accepts spoken input from the user and generates multimodal responses [9]. As in any language understanding system, assigning the correct referent to anaphoric referring expressions is a vital task of the system. An important component of this process is a data structure called the Discourse Context (DC), which contains a representation of the common ground o...
Jack McLaughlin, Douglas A. Reynolds, Terry P. Gleason
EUROSPEECH2
1999 Speaker and language recognition using speech codec parameters
abstract
This paper proposes our new text-to-speech (TTS) system that concatenates large numbers of speech segments to produce very natural and intelligible synthetic speech. One novel point of our system is its new synthesis unit, which is has three remarkable characteristics as follows; The synthesis units contain all Japanese syllables together with all possible vowel sequences, so very smooth synthetic speech is produced. Both previous and succeeding phoneme environments are considered when speech segments are concatenated, so natural sounding transients from a vowel to a consonant, which is the only concatenation point with the proposed unit, are present in the synthetic speech. Each unit has various fundamental frequency (F0) contours. Therefore, F0 modification rates are very small in any synthesis event, and the F0 modification process causes only minor distortion. To develop a unit database efficiently and effectively, we analyzed 4,850,000 Japanese phrases (breath-group) containing 87,810,000 phonemes and ranked them in order of appearance frequency. Listening tests confirm the high intelligibility and naturalness of speech produced by our new TTS system. It uses the 50,000 highest frequency units that cover over 77% of Japanese texts.
Thomas F. Quatieri, Elliot Singer, Robert B. Dunn, Douglas A. Reynolds, Joseph P. Campbell
EUROSPEECH4
1999 Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification
abstract
An automatic technique for estimating and modeling the glottal flow derivative source waveform from speech, and applying the model parameters to speaker identification, is presented. The estimate of the glottal flow derivative is decomposed into coarse structure, representing the general flow shape, and fine structure, comprising aspiration and other perturbations in the flow, from which model parameters are obtained. The glottal flow derivative is estimated using an inverse filter determined within a time interval of vocal-fold closure that is identified through differences in formant frequency modulation during the open and closed phases of the glottal cycle. This formant motion is predicted by Ananthapadmanabha and Fant (1982) to be a result of time-varying and nonlinear source/vocal tract coupling within a glottal cycle. The glottal flow derivative estimate is modeled using the Liljencrants-Fant (1986) model to capture its coarse structure, while the fine structure of the flow derivative is represented through energy and perturbation measures. The model parameters are used in a Gaussian mixture model speaker identification (SID) system. Both coarse- and fine-structure glottal features are shown to contain significant speaker-dependent information. For a large TIMIT database subset, averaging over male and female SID scores, the coarse-structure parameters achieve about 60% accuracy, the fine-structure parameters give about 40% accuracy, and their combination yields about 70% correct identification. Finally, in preliminary experiments on the counterpart telephone-degraded NTIMIT database, about a 5% error reduction in SID scores is obtained when source features are combined with traditional mel-cepstral measures.
Michael David Plumpe, Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
1998 Magnitude-only estimation of handset nonlinearity with application to speaker recognition
abstract
A method is described for estimating telephone handset nonlinearity by matching the spectral magnitude of the distorted signal to the output of a nonlinear channel model, driven by an undistorted reference. This "magnitude-only" representation allows the model to directly match unwanted speech formants that arise over nonlinear channels and that are a potential source of degradation in speaker and speech recognition algorithms. As such, the method is particularly suited to algorithms that use only spectral magnitude information. The distortion model consists of a memoryless polynomial nonlinearity sandwiched between two finite-length linear filters. Minimization of a mean-squared spectral magnitude error, with respect to model parameters, relies on iterative estimation via a gradient descent technique, using a Jacobian in the iterative correction term with gradients calculated by finite-element approximation. Initial work has demonstrated the algorithm's usefulness in speaker recognition over telephone channels by reducing mismatch between high- and low-quality handset conditions.
Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds, Gerald C. O'Leary
ICASSP2
1998 SHEEP, GOATS, LAMBS and WOLVES: a statistical analysis of speaker performance in the NIST 1998 speaker recognition evaluation
abstract
Performance variability in speech and speaker recognition systems can be attributed to many factors. One major factor, which is often acknowledged but seldom analyzed, is inherent differences in the recognizability of different speakers. In speaker recognition systems such differences are characterized by the use of animal names for different types of speakers, including sheep, goats, lambs and wolves, depending on their behavior with respect to automatic recognition systems. In this paper we propose statistical tests for the existence of these animals and apply these tests to hunt for such animals using results from the 1998 NIST speaker recognition evaluation.
George R. Doddington, Walter Liggett, Alvin F. Martin, Mark A. Przybocki, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICSLP5
1998 Blind clustering of speech utterances based on speaker and language characteristics
Douglas A. Reynolds, Elliot Singer, Beth A. Carlson, Gerald C. O'Leary, Jack McLaughlin, Marc A. Zissman
ICSLP1
1997 HTIMIT and LLHDB: speech corpora for the study of handset transducer effects
abstract
This paper describes two corpora collected at Lincoln Laboratory for the study of handset transducer effects on the speech signal: the handset TIMIT (HTIMIT) corpus and the Lincoln Laboratory Handset Database (LLHDB). The goal of these corpora are to minimize all confounding factors and produce speech predominately differing only in handset transducer effects. The speech is recorded directly from a telephone unit in a sound-booth using prompted text and extemporaneous photograph descriptions. The two corpora allow comparison of speech collected from a person speaking into a handset (LLHDB) versus speech played through a loudspeaker into a handset (HTIMIT). A comparison of analysis and results between the two corpora addresses the realism of artificially creating handset degraded speech by playing recorded speech through the handsets. The corpora are designed primarily for speaker recognition experimentation (in terms of amount of speech and level of transcription), but since both speaker and speech recognition systems operate on the same acoustic features affected by the handset, the knowledge gleaned is directly transferable to speech recognizers. Initial speaker identification performance on these corpora are presented. In addition, the application of HTIMIT in developing a handset detector that was successfully used on a Switchboard speaker verification task is described.
Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP1
1997 Comparison of background normalization methods for text-independent speaker verification
abstract
This paper compares two approaches to background model representation for a text-independent speaker verification task using Gaussian mixture models. We compare speaker-dependent background speaker sets to the use of a universal, speaker-independent background model (UBM). For the UBM, we describe how Bayesian adaptation can be used to derive claimant speaker models, providing a structure leading to significant computational savings during recognition. Experiments are conducted on the 1996 NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation corpus and it is clearly shown that a system using a UBM and Bayesian adaptation of claimant models produces superior performance compared to speaker-dependent background sets or the UBM with independent claimant models. In addition, the creation and use of a telephone handset-type detector and a procedure called hnorm is also described which shows further, large improvements in verification performance, especially under the difficult mismatched handset conditions. This is believed to be the first use of applying a handset-type detector and explicit handset-type normalization for the speaker verification task.
Douglas A. Reynolds
EUROSPEECH1
1996 Fine structure features for speaker identification
abstract
The performance of speaker identification (SID) systems can be improved by the addition of the rapidly varying "fine structure" features of formant amplitude and/or frequency modulation and multiple excitation pulses. This paper shows how the estimation of such fine structure features can be improved further by obtaining better estimates of formant frequency locations and uncovering various sources of error in the feature extraction systems. Most female telephone speech showed "spurious" formants, due to distortion in the telephone network. Nevertheless, SID performance was greatest with these spurious formants as formant estimates. A new feature has also been identified which can increase SID performance: cepstral coefficients from noise in the estimated excitation waveform. Finally, statistical tools have been developed to explore the relative importance of features used for SID, with the ultimate goal of uncovering the source of the features that provide SID performance improvement.
Charles R. Jankowski Jr., Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP3
1996 The effects of handset variability on speaker recognition performance: experiments on the Switchboard corpus
abstract
This paper presents an empirical study of the effects of handset variability on text-independent speaker recognition performance using the Switchboard corpus. Handset variability occurs when training speech is collected using one type of handset, but a different handset is used for collecting test speech. For the Switchboard corpus, the calling telephone number associated with a file is used to imply the handset used. Analysis of experiments designed to focus on handset variability on the SPIDRE database and the May95 NIST speaker recognition evaluation database, show that a performance gap between matched and mismatched handset tests persists even after applying several standard channel compensation techniques. Error rates for the mismatched tests are over 4 times those for the matched tests. Lastly, a new energy dependent cepstral mean subtraction technique is proposed to compensate for nonlinear distortions, but is not found to improve performance on the databases used.
Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP1
1995 Measuring fine structure in speech: application to speaker identification
abstract
The performance of systems for speaker identification (SID) can be quite good with clean speech, though much lower with degraded speech. Thus it is useful to search for new features for SID, particularly features that are robust over a degraded channel. This paper investigates features that are based on amplitude and frequency modulations of speech formants, high resolution measurement of fundamental frequency and location of "secondary pulses", measured using a high-resolution energy operator. When these features are added to traditional features using an existing SID system with a 168 speaker telephone speech database, SID performance improved by as much as 4% for male speakers and 8.2% for female speakers.
Charles R. Jankowski Jr., Thomas F. Quatieri, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP3
1995 The effects of telephone transmission degradations on speaker recognition performance
abstract
The two largest factors affecting automatic speaker identification performance are the size of the population and the degradations introduced by noisy communication channels (e.g., telephone transmission). To examine experimentally these two factors, this paper presents text-independent speaker identification results for varying speaker population sizes up to 630 speakers for both clean, wideband speech and telephone speech. A system based on Gaussian mixture speaker models is used for speaker identification and experiments are conducted on the TIMIT and NTIMIT databases. This is believed to be the first speaker identification experiments on the complete 630 speaker TIMIT and NTIMIT databases and the largest text-independent speaker identification task reported to date. Identification accuracies of 99.5% and 60.7% are achieved on the TIMIT and NTIMIT databases, respectively. This paper also presents experiments which examine and attempt to quantify the performance loss associated with various telephone degradations by systematically degrading the TIMIT speech in a manner consistent with measured NTIMIT degradations and measuring the performance loss at each step. It is found that the standard degradations of filtering and additive noise do not account for all of the performance gap between the TIMIT and NTIMIT data. Measurements of nonlinear microphone distortions are also described which may explain the additional performance loss.
Douglas A. Reynolds, Marc A. Zissman, Thomas F. Quatieri, Gerald C. O'Leary, Beth A. Carlson
ICASSP1
1995 Text-dependent speaker verification using decoupled and integrated speaker and speech recognizers
Douglas A. Reynolds, Beth A. Carlson
EUROSPEECH1
1995 Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
Douglas A. Reynolds
Speech Commun.1
1995 Large population speaker identification using clean and telephone speech
abstract
This paper presents text-independent speaker identification results for varying speaker population sizes up to 630 speakers for both clean, wideband speech, and telephone speech. A system based on Gaussian mixture speaker models is used for speaker identification, and experiments are conducted on the TIMIT and NTIMIT databases. The TIMIT results show large population performance under near-ideal conditions, and the NTIMIT results show the corresponding accuracy loss due to telephone transmission. These are believed to be the first speaker identification experiments on the complete 630 speaker TIMIT and NTIMIT databases and the largest text-independent speaker identification task reported to date. Identification accuracies of 99.5 and 60.7% were achieved on the TIMIT and NTIMIT databases, respectively.>
Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.1
1995 Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models
abstract
This paper introduces and motivates the use of Gaussian mixture models (GMM) for robust text-independent speaker identification. The individual Gaussian components of a GMM are shown to represent some general speaker-dependent spectral shapes that are effective for modeling speaker identity. The focus of this work is on applications which require high identification rates using short utterance from unconstrained conversational speech and robustness to degradations produced by transmission over a telephone channel. A complete experimental evaluation of the Gaussian mixture speaker model is conducted on a 49 speaker, conversational telephone speech database. The experiments examine algorithmic issues (initialization, variance limiting, model order selection), spectral variability robustness techniques, large population performance, and comparisons to other speaker modeling techniques (uni-modal Gaussian, VQ codebook, tied Gaussian mixture, and radial basis functions). The Gaussian mixture speaker model attains 96.8% identification accuracy using 5 second clean speech utterances and 80.8% accuracy using 15 second telephone speech utterances with a 49 speaker population and is shown to outperform the other speaker modeling techniques on an identical 16 speaker telephone speech task.>
Douglas A. Reynolds, Richard C. Rose
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
1994 Energy onset times for speaker identification
abstract
Onset times of resonant energy pulses are measured with the high-resolution Teager operator and used as features in the Reynolds Gaussian-mixture speaker identification algorithm. Feature sets are constructed with primary pitch and secondary pulse locations derived from low and high speech formants. Preliminary testing was performed with a confusable 40-speaker subset from the NTIMIT (telephone channel) database. Speaker identification improved from 55 to 70% correct classification when the full set of new resonant energy-based features were added as an independent stream to conventional mel-cepstra.>
Thomas F. Quatieri, Charles R. Jankowski Jr., Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.3
1994 Experimental evaluation of features for robust speaker identification
abstract
This correspondence presents an experimental evaluation of different features and channel compensation techniques for robust speaker identification. The goal is to keep all processing and classification steps constant and to vary only the features and compensations used to allow a controlled comparison. A general, maximum-likelihood classifier based on Gaussian mixture densities is used as the classifier, and experiments are conducted on the King speech database, a conversational, telephone-speech database. The features examined are mel-frequency and linear-frequency filterbank cepstral coefficients, linear prediction cepstral coefficients, and perceptual linear prediction (PLP) cepstral coefficients. The channel compensation techniques examined are cepstral mean removal, RASTA processing, and a quadratic trend removal technique. It is shown for this database that performance differences between the basic features is small, and the major gains are due to the channel compensation techniques. The best "across-the-divide" recognition accuracy of 92% is obtained for both high-order LPC features and band-limited filterbank features.>
Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
1994 Integrated models of signal and background with application to speaker identification in noise
abstract
Discusses the problem of robust parametric model estimation and classification in noisy acoustic environments. Characterization and modeling of the external noise sources in these environments is in itself an important issue in noise compensation. The techniques described provide a mechanism for integrating parametric models of the acoustic background with the signal model so that noise compensation is tightly coupled with signal model training and classification. Prior information about the acoustic background process is provided using a maximum likelihood parameter estimation procedure that integrates an a priori model of the acoustic background with the signal model. An experimental study is presented on the application of this approach to text-independent speaker identification in noisy acoustic environments. Considerable improvement in speaker classification performance was obtained for classifying unlabeled sections of conversational speech utterances from a 16-speaker population under cross-environment training and testing conditions.>
Richard C. Rose, Edward M. Hofstetter, Douglas A. Reynolds
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
1992 An integrated speech-background model for robust speaker identification
abstract
A procedure for text-independent speaker identification in noisy environments where the interfering background signals cannot be characterized using traditional broadband or impulsive noise models is examined. In the procedure, both the speaker and the background processes are modeled using mixtures of Gaussians. Speaker and background models are integrated into a unified statistical framework allowing the decoupling of the underlying speech process from the noise corrupted observations via the expectation-minimization algorithm. Using this formalism, speaker model parameters are estimated in the presence of the background process, and a scoring procedure is implemented for computing the speaker likelihood in the noise corrupted environment. The performance was evaluated using a 16-speaker conversational speech database with both speech babble and white noise background processes.>
Douglas A. Reynolds, Richard C. Rose
ICASSP1
1991 Integration of speaker and speech recognition systems
abstract
A combination of a high-performance speaker identification system and an isolated word recognizer is presented. The front-end text-independent speaker identification system determines the most likely speaker for an input word. The speaker identity is then used to choose the reference word models for the speech recognizer. When used with a closed set of speakers, the combination is capable of automatically producing speech and speaker identification. For an open set of speakers, the speaker recognition system acts as speaker quantizer which associates the unknown speaker with an acoustically similar speaker. The matching speaker's word models are used in the speech recognizer. The application of this front-end speaker recognizer is described for a DTW and HMM speech recognizer. Results on a combination using a DTW word recognizer are 100% for closed set experiments.>
Douglas A. Reynolds, Larry Heck
ICASSP1
1991 Robust speaker identification in noisy environments using noise adaptive speaker models
abstract
The use of probabilistic mixture densities for text-independent speaker identification in a noisy telephone channel environment is investigated. Two techniques for noise compensation are considered. In the first approach, a background noise model is integrated directly into the model for speech. In the second approach, noise preprocessing techniques are used to compensate noisy observations before passing them along to the speaker identification on conversational utterances collected over long-distance telephone channels from ten speakers. The integrated noise model was noted for having a noise suppression characteristic that arises naturally from the statistical model, which is important if one wishes to avoid the ad hoc fine tuning of thresholds required in the noise processing approach implemented.>
Richard C. Rose, J. Fitzmaurice, Edward M. Hofstetter, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP4
1990 Text independent speaker identification using automatic acoustic segmentation
abstract
An acoustic-class-dependent technique for text-independent speaker identification on very short utterances is described. The technique is based on maximum-likelihood estimation of a Gaussian mixture model representation of speaker identity. Gaussian mixtures are noted for their robustness as a parametric model and their ability to form smooth estimates of rather arbitrary underlying densities. Speaker model parameters are estimated using a special case of the iterative expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, and a number of techniques are investigated for improving model robustness. The system is evaluated using a 12 reference speaker population from a conversational speech database. It achieves 80% average text-independent speaker identification performance for a 1-s test utterance length.>
Richard C. Rose, Douglas A. Reynolds
ICASSP2