Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jill J. Hallenbeck

dblp:21/3056 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 56% Integrated circuit design · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
arithmetic circuit design
0.011988
Modulo 3 Residue Checker: New Results on Performance and Cost · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
concurrent error detection
0.011988
Modulo 3 Residue Checker: New Results on Performance and Cost · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error latency
0.011988
Modulo 3 Residue Checker: New Results on Performance and Cost · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0register transfer language · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Design of fault-tolerant systems
abstract
Design features (e.g. reliability, maintainability, and testability) of systems designed to tolerate faults which could compromise the safe and secure operation of a system are discussed. Design automation issues are discussed with a focus on the future. The reliability of proposed systems is assessed using HARP, the hybrid automated reliability predictor, a software package for reliability prediction.>
Jill J. Hallenbeck, Joanne Bechta Dugan
CBMS1
1990 The Test Engineer's Assistant revisited-refinements on a prototype software tool
abstract
The approaches currently used for adding testability into system designs are based on ad-hoc testing methods or on the experience of a design team supported by testing experts. This paper presents a design methodology and a knowledge-based CAD environment that allows a system designer to incorporate testability into a design in a formal, verifiable way which also provides clear documentation for this activity. Prototype CAD tools have been built and have met with limited in-house use success. The design and implementation of the current prototype tools, collectively known as the Test Engineer's Assistant (TEA) tools, along with lessons learned and elements of a more robust system will be presented.>
Jill J. Hallenbeck
RSP1
1988 CAD Tools for Supporting System Design for Testability
abstract
A methodology and the supporting CAD (computer-aided design) tools are discussed for designing a digital system so that it can meet predefined testability requirements. The set of tools is called the Test Engineer's Assistant (TEA). The TEA system creates an environment in which the designer can perform performance assessment, functional design, and design for testability (DFT). TEA is developed to support automated DFT at the board and subsystem levels, to aid in an appropriate choice of BIT (built-in test) techniques at the board level that is supported at the subsystem and system levels, to indicate where to augment system function with predefined BIT modules to increase testability, and to assess the hardware costs of implementing DFT and BIT.>
Jill J. Hallenbeck, Nick Kanopoulos, Nagesh Vasanthavada, James W. Watterson
ITC1
1988 Modulo 3 Residue Checker: New Results on Performance and Cost
abstract
The performance and cost of a modulo-3 residue code checker that has been attached to a pipelined serial multiplier to provide a concurrent self-test capability are considered. Analytical results are derived for error detection coverage and minimum error latency; these quantities are observed to be in agreement with simulation results obtained by using ISPS, a register-transfer language. The residue checker error detection coverage and minimum error latency are observed to be dependent on the statistical properties of the multiplier input operands. The checker and serial multiplier were implemented in 4- mu m NMOS, using a standard cell design. The residue code checker required approximately half of the total silicon area.>
James W. Watterson, Jill J. Hallenbeck
IEEE Trans. Computers2