Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Danny Nebenzahl
dblp:21/3636
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
exploitation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006 |
Systems and software security
memory safety |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006 |
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › instrumentation
binary instrumentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
install-time vaccination · 0.1binary instrumentation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing AttacksabstractStack smashing is still one of the most popular techniques for computer system attack. In this work, we present an anti-stack-smashing defense technique for Microsoft Windows systems. Our approach works at install-time, and does not rely on having access to the source-code: The user decides when and which executables to vaccinate. Our technique consists of instrumenting a given executable with a mechanism to detect stack smashing attacks. We developed a prototype implementing our technique and verified that it successfully defends against actual exploit code. We then extended our prototype to vaccinate DLLs, multithreaded applications, and DLLs used by multithreaded applications, which present significant additional complications. We present promising performance results measured on SPEC2000 benchmarks: Vaccinated executables were no more than 8 percent slower than their un-vaccinated originals. Danny Nebenzahl, Shmuel Sagiv, Avishai Wool |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2004 | Install-time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend Against Stack Smashing Attacks
Danny Nebenzahl, Avishai Wool |
SEC | 1 |