Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Danny Nebenzahl

dblp:21/3636 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.112006
Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.112006
Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › instrumentation
binary instrumentation
0.012006
Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

install-time vaccination · 0.1binary instrumentation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Install-Time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend against Stack Smashing Attacks
abstract
Stack smashing is still one of the most popular techniques for computer system attack. In this work, we present an anti-stack-smashing defense technique for Microsoft Windows systems. Our approach works at install-time, and does not rely on having access to the source-code: The user decides when and which executables to vaccinate. Our technique consists of instrumenting a given executable with a mechanism to detect stack smashing attacks. We developed a prototype implementing our technique and verified that it successfully defends against actual exploit code. We then extended our prototype to vaccinate DLLs, multithreaded applications, and DLLs used by multithreaded applications, which present significant additional complications. We present promising performance results measured on SPEC2000 benchmarks: Vaccinated executables were no more than 8 percent slower than their un-vaccinated originals.
Danny Nebenzahl, Shmuel Sagiv, Avishai Wool
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.1
2004 Install-time Vaccination of Windows Executables to Defend Against Stack Smashing Attacks
Danny Nebenzahl, Avishai Wool
SEC1