Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Murphy

dblp:21/3894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Security and privacy · 2Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 67% Computational social science and digital humanities · 25% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 8%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 53% Information extraction and text analysis · 47%
Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 86% Data models and query languages · 14%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
cognitive neuroscience
0.212016
BrainBench: A Brain-Image Test Suite for Distributional Semantic Models · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › distributed representation learning
semantic vector representation
0.212014
Interpretable Semantic Vectors from a Joint Model of Brain- and Text- Based Meaning · ACL (1) 2014
Computational social science and digital humanities › cognitive science
cognitive neuroscience of language
0.112009
EEG responds to conceptual stimuli and corpus semantics · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › distributional semantics
distributional semantic models
0.112016
BrainBench: A Brain-Image Test Suite for Distributional Semantic Models · EMNLP 2016
Query processing and optimization
multi-query optimization
0.012003
Rainbow: Multi-XQuery Optimization Using Materialized XML Views · SIGMOD Conference 2003
Query processing and optimization › XML query processing
XQuery processing
0.012002
Rainbow: mapping-driven XQuery processing system · SIGMOD Conference 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.012009
EEG responds to conceptual stimuli and corpus semantics · EMNLP 2009
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key cryptanalysis
0.012000
Factorization of a 512-Bit RSA Modulus · EUROCRYPT 2000
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key cryptanalysis
RSA factorization
0.012000
Factorization of a 512-Bit RSA Modulus · EUROCRYPT 2000
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
integer factorization
0.011999
Factorization of RSA-140 Using the Number Field Sieve · ASIACRYPT 1999
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › integer factorization
number field sieve
0.011999
Factorization of RSA-140 Using the Number Field Sieve · ASIACRYPT 1999
Data models and query languages › XML query languages
XQuery
0.012003
Rainbow: Multi-XQuery Optimization Using Materialized XML Views · SIGMOD Conference 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 0.5corpus semantics · 0.2EEG · 0.2joint non-negative sparse embedding · 0.2brain imaging data fusion · 0.2number field sieve · 0.1materialized views · 0.0lattice sieving · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Using Sparse Semantic Embeddings Learned from Multimodal Text and Image Data to Model Human Conceptual Knowledge
abstract
Distributional models provide a convenient way to model semantics using dense embedding spaces derived from unsupervised learning algorithms.However, the dimensions of dense embedding spaces are not designed to resemble human semantic knowledge.Moreover, embeddings are often built from a single source of information (typically text data), even though neurocognitive research suggests that semantics is deeply linked to both language and perception.In this paper, we combine multimodal information from both text and image-based representations derived from state-of-the-art distributional models to produce sparse, interpretable vectors using Joint Non-Negative Sparse Embedding.Through indepth analyses comparing these sparse models to human-derived behavioural and neuroimaging data, we demonstrate their ability to predict interpretable linguistic descriptions of human ground-truth semantic knowledge.
Steven Derby, Paul Miller 0003, Brian Murphy, Barry Devereux
CoNLL3
2016 BrainBench: A Brain-Image Test Suite for Distributional Semantic Models
abstract
The brain is the locus of our language ability, and so brain images can be used to ground linguistic theories.Here we introduce Brain-Bench, a lightweight system for testing distributional models of word semantics.We compare the performance of several models, and show that the performance on brain-image tasks differs from the performance on behavioral tasks.We release our benchmark test as part of a web service.
Haoyan Xu, Brian Murphy, Alona Fyshe
EMNLP2
2015 A Compositional and Interpretable Semantic Space
abstract
Alona Fyshe, Leila Wehbe, Partha P. Talukdar, Brian Murphy, Tom M. Mitchell. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Alona Fyshe, Leila Wehbe, Partha P. Talukdar, Brian Murphy, Tom M. Mitchell
HLT-NAACL4
2014 Interpretable Semantic Vectors from a Joint Model of Brain- and Text- Based Meaning
abstract
Vector space models (VSMs) represent word meanings as points in a high dimensional space. VSMs are typically created using a large text corpora, and so represent word semantics as observed in text. We present a new algorithm (JNNSE) that can incorporate a measure of semantics not previously used to create VSMs: brain activation data recorded while people read words. The resulting model takes advantage of the complementary strengths and weaknesses of corpus and brain activation data to give a more complete representation of semantics. Evaluations show that the model 1) matches a behavioral measure of semantics more closely, 2) can be used to predict corpus data for unseen words and 3) has predictive power that generalizes across brain imaging technologies and across subjects. We believe that the model is thus a more faithful representation of mental vocabularies.
Alona Fyshe, Partha P. Talukdar, Brian Murphy, Tom M. Mitchell
ACL (1)3
2014 Predicting the semantic neural representations in Korean-Chinese early bilinguals
MiaoMei Lei, Hiroyuki Akama, Brian Murphy
CogSci3
2014 Turbo-SMT: Accelerating Coupled Sparse Matrix-Tensor Factorizations by 200x
abstract
How can we correlate the neural activity in the human brain as it responds to typed words, with properties of these terms (like ‘edible’, ‘fits in hand’)? In short, we want to find latent variables, that jointly explain both the brain activity, as well as the behavioral responses. This is one of many settings of the Coupled Matrix-Tensor Factorization (CMTF) problem. Can we accelerate any CMTF solver, so that it runs within a few minutes instead of tens of hours to a day, while maintaining good accuracy? We introduce Turbo-SMT, a meta-method capable of doing exactly that: it boosts the performance of any CMTF algorithm, by up to 200x, along with an up to 65 fold increase in sparsity, with comparable accuracy to the baseline. We apply Turbo-SMT to BrainQ, a dataset consisting of a (nouns, brain voxels, human subjects) tensor and a (nouns, properties) matrix, with coupling along the nouns dimension. Turbo-SMT is able to find meaningful latent variables, as well as to predict brain activity with competitive accuracy.
Evangelos E. Papalexakis, Christos Faloutsos, Tom M. Mitchell, Partha P. Talukdar, Nicholas D. Sidiropoulos, Brian Murphy
SDM6
2013 Neural representations of language switching in early bilinguals: An fMRI study
MiaoMei Lei, Hiroyuki Akama, Brian Murphy
CogSci3
2013 Documents and Dependencies: an Exploration of Vector Space Models for Semantic Composition
Alona Fyshe, Brian Murphy, Partha P. Talukdar, Tom M. Mitchell
CoNLL2
2012 Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis Applied to the Language Switch in the Bilingual Brain-An fMRI Study
Hiroyuki Akama, MiaoMei Lei, Li Na, Brian Murphy
CogSci4
2012 Learning Effective and Interpretable Semantic Models using Non-Negative Sparse Embedding
Brian Murphy, Partha P. Talukdar, Tom M. Mitchell
COLING1
2009 EEG responds to conceptual stimuli and corpus semantics
Brian Murphy, Marco Baroni, Massimo Poesio
EMNLP1
2008 Schur aggregation for linear systems and determinants
Victor Y. Pan, D. Grady, Brian Murphy, Guoliang Qian, Rhys Eric Rosholt, Anatole D. Ruslanov
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2005 Order-Sensitive XML Query Processing over Relational Sources: An Algebraic Approach
abstract
The XML data is order-sensitive. The order problem, that is how ordered XML documents and order-sensitive queries over it can be efficiently supported when mapped into the unordered relational data model, has not yet been adequately addressed. In this paper, we present a general approach for supporting order-sensitive XQuery-to-SQL translation that works irrespective of the chosen XML-to-relational data mapping and the selected order-encoding method. Our approach, called XSOT, utilizes an order-aware XML algebra representation. We propose order-sensitive rewriting rules at the algebraic level to eliminate the dependency of the order determining operators on the implicit XML view order. Furthermore, we introduce a series of order-sensitive optimization steps to transform the XML algebra tree for the purpose of efficient SQL translation. Lastly, we utilize a template-based approach using SQL-99 order features to generate SQL statements.
Ling Wang 0002, Song Wang 0001, Brian Murphy, Elke A. Rundensteiner
IDEAS3
2003 Rainbow: Multi-XQuery Optimization Using Materialized XML Views
abstract
No abstract available.
Xin Zhang 0002, Katica Dimitrova, Ling Wang 0002, Maged El-Sayed, Brian Murphy, Bradford Pielech, Mukesh Mulchandani, Luping Ding, Elke A. Rundensteiner
SIGMOD Conference5
2002 Rainbow: mapping-driven XQuery processing system
abstract
No abstract available.
Xin Zhang 0002, Mukesh Mulchandani, Steffen Christ, Brian Murphy, Elke A. Rundensteiner
SIGMOD Conference4
2000 Factorization of a 512-Bit RSA Modulus
Stefania Cavallar, Bruce Dodson, Arjen K. Lenstra, Walter M. Lioen, Peter L. Montgomery, Brian Murphy, Herman J. J. te Riele, Karen Aardal, Jeff Gilchrist, Gérard Guillerm, Paul C. Leyland, Joël Marchand, François Morain, Alec Muffett, Chris Putnam, Craig Putnam, Paul Zimmermann 0001
EUROCRYPT6
1999 Factorization of RSA-140 Using the Number Field Sieve
Stefania Cavallar, Bruce Dodson, Arjen K. Lenstra, Paul C. Leyland, Walter M. Lioen, Peter L. Montgomery, Brian Murphy, Herman J. J. te Riele, Paul Zimmermann 0001
ASIACRYPT7