Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Threadgill
dblp:21/3955
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0003-3538-1635ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 87% Computational complexity · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › pattern mining
association analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree Hierarchies · ICDM 2008 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization
diversity maximization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sample Selection for Maximal Diversity · ICDM 2007 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sample Selection for Maximal Diversity · ICDM 2007 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree Hierarchies · ICDM 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree hierarchies · 0.1permutation test · 0.1set cover reduction · 0.1greedy approximation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree HierarchiesabstractAssociation analysis arises in many important applications such as bioinformatics and business intelligence. Given a large collection of measurements over a set of samples, association analysis aims to find dependencies of target variables to subsets of measurements. Most previous algorithms adopt a two-stage approach; they first group samples based on the similarity in the subset of measurements, and then they examine the association between these groups and the specified target variables without considering the inter-group similarities or alternative groupings. This can lead to cases where the strength of association depends significantly on arbitrary clustering choices. In this paper, we propose a tree-based method for quantitative association analysis. Tree hierarchies derived from sample similarities represent many possible sample groupings. They also provide a natural way to incorporate domain knowledge such as ontologies and to identify and remove outliers. Given a tree hierarchy, our association analysis evaluates all possible groupings and selects the one with strongest association to the target variable. We introduce an efficient algorithm, TreeQA, to systematically explore the search-space of all possible groupings in a set of input trees, with integrated permutation tests. Experimental results show that TreeQA is able to handlelarge-scale association analysis very efficiently and is more effective and robust in association analysis than previous methods. Feng Pan 0001, Lynda Yang, Leonard McMillan, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, David Threadgill, Wei Wang 0010 |
ICDM | 5 |
| 2008 | Genotype Sequence Segmentation: Handling Constraints and Noise
Qi Zhang 0025, Wei Wang 0010, Leonard McMillan, Jan F. Prins, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, David Threadgill |
WABI | 6 |
| 2007 | Sample Selection for Maximal DiversityabstractThe problem of selecting a sample subset sufficient to preserve diversity arises in many applications. One example is in the design of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) for genetic association studies. In this context, genetic diversity is measured by how many alleles are retained in the resulting inbred strains. RIL panels that are derived from more than two parental strains, such as the collaborative cross (Churchill et al., 2004), present a particular challenge with regard to which of the many existing lab mouse strains should be included in the initial breeding funnel in order to maximize allele retention. A similar problem occurs in the study of customer reviews when selecting a subset of products with a maximal diversity in reviews. Diversity in this case implies the presence of a set of products having both positive and negative ranks for each customer. In this paper, we demonstrate that selecting an optimal diversity subset is an NP-complete problem via reduction to set cover. This reduction is sufficiently tight that greedy approximations to the set cover problem directly apply to maximizing diversity. We then suggest a slightly modified subset selection problem in which an initial greedy diversity solution is used to effectively prune an exhaustive search for all diversity subsets bounded from below by a specified coverage threshold. Extensive experiments on real datasets are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach. Feng Pan 0001, Adam Roberts, Leonard McMillan, David Threadgill, Wei Wang 0010 |
ICDM | 4 |