Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Threadgill

dblp:21/3955 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0003-3538-1635ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 87% Computational complexity · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › pattern mining
association analysis
0.112008
Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree Hierarchies · ICDM 2008
Mathematical optimization › optimization
diversity maximization
0.112007
Sample Selection for Maximal Diversity · ICDM 2007
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.112007
Sample Selection for Maximal Diversity · ICDM 2007
Data mining
pattern mining
0.012008
Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree Hierarchies · ICDM 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree hierarchies · 0.1permutation test · 0.1set cover reduction · 0.1greedy approximation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Quantitative Association Analysis Using Tree Hierarchies
abstract
Association analysis arises in many important applications such as bioinformatics and business intelligence. Given a large collection of measurements over a set of samples, association analysis aims to find dependencies of target variables to subsets of measurements. Most previous algorithms adopt a two-stage approach; they first group samples based on the similarity in the subset of measurements, and then they examine the association between these groups and the specified target variables without considering the inter-group similarities or alternative groupings. This can lead to cases where the strength of association depends significantly on arbitrary clustering choices. In this paper, we propose a tree-based method for quantitative association analysis. Tree hierarchies derived from sample similarities represent many possible sample groupings. They also provide a natural way to incorporate domain knowledge such as ontologies and to identify and remove outliers. Given a tree hierarchy, our association analysis evaluates all possible groupings and selects the one with strongest association to the target variable. We introduce an efficient algorithm, TreeQA, to systematically explore the search-space of all possible groupings in a set of input trees, with integrated permutation tests. Experimental results show that TreeQA is able to handlelarge-scale association analysis very efficiently and is more effective and robust in association analysis than previous methods.
Feng Pan 0001, Lynda Yang, Leonard McMillan, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, David Threadgill, Wei Wang 0010
ICDM5
2008 Genotype Sequence Segmentation: Handling Constraints and Noise
Qi Zhang 0025, Wei Wang 0010, Leonard McMillan, Jan F. Prins, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena, David Threadgill
WABI6
2007 Sample Selection for Maximal Diversity
abstract
The problem of selecting a sample subset sufficient to preserve diversity arises in many applications. One example is in the design of recombinant inbred lines (RIL) for genetic association studies. In this context, genetic diversity is measured by how many alleles are retained in the resulting inbred strains. RIL panels that are derived from more than two parental strains, such as the collaborative cross (Churchill et al., 2004), present a particular challenge with regard to which of the many existing lab mouse strains should be included in the initial breeding funnel in order to maximize allele retention. A similar problem occurs in the study of customer reviews when selecting a subset of products with a maximal diversity in reviews. Diversity in this case implies the presence of a set of products having both positive and negative ranks for each customer. In this paper, we demonstrate that selecting an optimal diversity subset is an NP-complete problem via reduction to set cover. This reduction is sufficiently tight that greedy approximations to the set cover problem directly apply to maximizing diversity. We then suggest a slightly modified subset selection problem in which an initial greedy diversity solution is used to effectively prune an exhaustive search for all diversity subsets bounded from below by a specified coverage threshold. Extensive experiments on real datasets are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.
Feng Pan 0001, Adam Roberts, Leonard McMillan, David Threadgill, Wei Wang 0010
ICDM4