Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Földiák
dblp:21/4446
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0001-7407-5804ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 63% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008 Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › concept formation › formal concept analysis
concept lattice |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › concept formation
formal concept analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike train analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007 |
Information theory › estimation theory
bayesian estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Information theory › estimation theory
entropy estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Information theory › information measures
mutual information |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.2formal concept analysis · 0.2gaussian kernel smoothing · 0.1bayesian binning · 0.1piecewise-constant distribution · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept AnalysisabstractWe propose a novel application of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to neural decoding: instead of just trying to figure out which stimulus was presented, we demonstrate how to explore the semantic relationships between the neural representation of large sets of stimuli. FCA provides a way of displaying and interpreting such relationships via concept lattices. We explore the effects of neural code sparsity on the lattice. We then analyze neurophysiological data from high-level visual cortical area STSa, using an exact Bayesian approach to construct the formal context needed by FCA. Prominent features of the resulting concept lattices are discussed, including indications for a product-of-experts code in real neurons. Dominik M. Endres, Peter Földiák |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2007 | Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histogramsabstractThe peristimulus time historgram (PSTH) and its more continuous cousin, the spike density function (SDF) are staples in the analytic toolkit of neurophysiologists. The former is usually obtained by binning spiketrains, whereas the standard method for the latter is smoothing with a Gaussian kernel. Selection of a bin with or a kernel size is often done in an relatively arbitrary fashion, even though there have been recent attempts to remedy this situation \cite{ShimazakiBinningNIPS2006,ShimazakiBinningNECO2007}. We develop an exact Bayesian, generative model approach to estimating PSHTs and demonstate its superiority to competing methods. Further advantages of our scheme include automatic complexity control and error bars on its predictions. Dominik M. Endres, Mike W. Oram, Johannes E. Schindelin, Peter Földiák |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2005 | Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual informationabstractWe present an exact Bayesian treatment of a simple, yet sufficiently general probability distribution model. We consider piecewise-constant distributions P(X) with uniform (second-order) prior over location of discontinuity points and assigned chances. The predictive distribution and the model complexity can be determined completely from the data in a computational time that is linear in the number of degrees of freedom and quadratic in the number of possible values of X. Furthermore, exact values of the expectations of entropies and their variances can be computed with polynomial effort. The expectation of the mutual information becomes thus available, too, and a strict upper bound on its variance. The resulting algorithm is particularly useful in experimental research areas where the number of available samples is severely limited (e.g., neurophysiology). Estimates on a simulated data set provide more accurate results than using a previously proposed method. Dominik M. Endres, Peter Földiák |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2001 | Stimulus optimisation in primary visual cortex
Peter Földiák |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 1996 | Learning generalisation and localisation: Competition for stimulus type and receptive field
Mike W. Oram, Peter Földiák |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 1991 | Learning Invariance from Transformation SequencesabstractThe visual system can reliably identify objects even when the retinal image is transformed considerably by commonly occurring changes in the environment. A local learning rule is proposed, which allows a network to learn to generalize across such transformations. During the learning phase, the network is exposed to temporal sequences of patterns undergoing the transformation. An application of the algorithm is presented in which the network learns invariance to shift in retinal position. Such a principle may be involved in the development of the characteristic shift invariance property of complex cells in the primary visual cortex, and also in the development of more complicated invariance properties of neurons in higher visual areas. Peter Földiák |
Neural Comput. | 1 |