Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Shalmon

dblp:21/4864 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 50% Routing and switching · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling
delay analysis
0.011987
Exact Delay Analysis of Packet-Switching Concentrating Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1987
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks
0.011987
Exact Delay Analysis of Packet-Switching Concentrating Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1987
Routing and switching › service disciplines
priority discipline
0.011987
Exact Delay Analysis of Packet-Switching Concentrating Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1987
Network performance modeling
queueing analysis
0.011987
Exact Delay Analysis of Packet-Switching Concentrating Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

moment generating function · 0.0batch poisson traffic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Exact Delay Analysis of Packet-Switching Concentrating Networks
abstract
We present an exact delay analysis for a packet-switching concentrating system consisting of an arbitrary number of active stations connected in tandem by unidirectional, asynchronous transmission lines, all with identical transmission rate. Packetized messages from exogenous sources enter the system at every station, are handled from station to station in a store-and-forward fashion, and exit at the downstream end; there are no intermediate departures. The service discipline at each station is either FCFS, fixed priority, or alternating priority, the transmission of a packet is not interrupted while in progress. We assume that the packets have identical length (in bits), that the sources are independent and that each source generates batch Poisson traffic. The FCFS case was solved by Kaplan [7] and Shalmon and Kaplan [19]. Here we analyze the priority disciplines. For the packets and messages from each source, we obtain the steady-state moment generating functions for their end-to-end waiting times. We offer simple formulas for the corresponding mean waiting times, and show that the Poisson approximation for departures is unreliable. The analysis for all three disciplines generalizes to the case where the line capacities are nonincreasing in the direction of the flow, and for the priority disciplines, it further generalizes to a concentrating tree network, and to an arrival process somewhat more general than batch Poisson.
Michael Shalmon
IEEE Trans. Commun.1