Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wen-Ying Xiong

dblp:21/5297 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.112008
Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008
Information retrieval › web search
topic distillation
0.112008
Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008
Information retrieval
web search
0.112008
Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
pseudo-relevance feedback
0.012008
Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.012008
Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relational learning · 0.1SVM-based optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search
abstract
Learning to rank is a new statistical learning technology on creating a ranking model for sorting objects. The technology has been successfully applied to web search, and is becoming one of the key machineries for building search engines. Existing approaches to learning to rank, however, did not consider the cases in which there exists relationship between the objects to be ranked, despite of the fact that such situations are very common in practice. For example, in web search, given a query certain relationships usually exist among the the retrieved documents, e.g., URL hierarchy, similarity, etc., and sometimes it is necessary to utilize the information in ranking of the documents. This paper addresses the issue and formulates it as a novel learning problem, referred to as, 'learning to rank relational objects'. In the new learning task, the ranking model is defined as a function of not only the contents (features) of objects but also the relations between objects. The paper further focuses on one setting of the learning problem in which the way of using relation information is predetermined. It formalizes the learning task as an optimization problem in the setting. The paper then proposes a new method to perform the optimization task, particularly an implementation based on SVM. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the baseline methods for two ranking tasks (Pseudo Relevance Feedback and Topic Distillation) in web search, indicating that the proposed method can indeed make effective use of relation information and content information in ranking.
Tao Qin 0001, Tie-Yan Liu, Xudong Zhang 0001, De-Sheng Wang, Wen-Ying Xiong, Hang Li 0001
WWW5