Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. Kumaran 0001

dblp:21/5881 · also Arumugam Kumaran 0001 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0009-0009-7802-1462ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 11 · 9 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
7 papers
Information retrieval · 45% Query processing and optimization · 26% Data models and query languages · 13%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Machine translation · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › transliteration
machine transliteration
0.122007
Babel: a machine transliteration workbench · SIGIR 2007
A generic framework for machine transliteration · SIGIR 2007
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
transliteration
0.122007
Babel: a machine transliteration workbench · SIGIR 2007
A generic framework for machine transliteration · SIGIR 2007
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › transliteration
transliteration mining
0.112010
PR + RQ ALMOST EQUAL TO PQ: Transliteration Mining Using Bridge Language · AAAI 2010
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
geographic information retrieval
0.112008
Crosslingual location search · SIGIR 2008
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.132008
Crosslingual location search · SIGIR 2008
Babel: a machine transliteration workbench · SIGIR 2007
A generic framework for machine transliteration · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
cross-lingual matching
0.122006
LexEQUAL: Supporting Multilexical Queries in SQL · ICDE 2004
On Pushing Multilingual Query Operators into Relational Engines · ICDE 2006
Indexing and storage engines
metric space indexing
0.112006
On Pushing Multilingual Query Operators into Relational Engines · ICDE 2006
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
query optimizer integration
0.112006
On Pushing Multilingual Query Operators into Relational Engines · ICDE 2006
Information retrieval
string matching
0.122004
LexEQUAL: Supporting Multilexical Queries in SQL · ICDE 2004
LexEQUAL: Multilexical Matching Operator in SQL · SIGMOD Conference 2004
Query processing and optimization › query execution
SQL operators
0.012004
LexEQUAL: Multilexical Matching Operator in SQL · SIGMOD Conference 2004
Database system architecture and tuning › database interface
multi-lingual database system
0.012003
On the Costs of Multilingualism in Database Systems · VLDB 2003
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
transliteration
0.012008
Crosslingual location search · SIGIR 2008
Data models and query languages
SQL
0.012004
LexEQUAL: Supporting Multilexical Queries in SQL · ICDE 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical learning · 0.3canonical correlation analysis · 0.1statistical machine transliteration · 0.1spatial constraints · 0.1fuzzy search · 0.1phonetic matching · 0.0multilexical matching · 0.0approximate string matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Online Gaming for Crowd-sourcing Phrase-equivalents
A. Kumaran 0001, Melissa Densmore, Shaishav Kumar
COLING1
2012 An Empirical Study of the Occurrence and Co-Occurrence of Named Entities in Natural Language Corpora
K. Saravanan 0001, Monojit Choudhury, Raghavendra Udupa, A. Kumaran 0001
LREC4
2010 PR + RQ ALMOST EQUAL TO PQ: Transliteration Mining Using Bridge Language
abstract
We address the problem of mining name transliterations from comparable corpora in languages P and Q in the following resource-poor scenario:Parallel names in PQ are not available for training. Parallel names in PR and RQ are available for training.We propose a novel solution for the problem by computing a common geometric feature space for P,Q and R where name transliterations are mapped to similar vectors. We employ Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) to compute the common geometric feature space using only parallel names in PR and RQ and without requiring parallel names in PQ. We test our algorithm on data sets in several languages and show that it gives results comparable to the state-of-the-art transliteration mining algorithms that use parallel names in PQ for training.
Mitesh M. Khapra, Raghavendra Udupa, A. Kumaran 0001, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
AAAI3
2010 Everybody loves a rich cousin: An empirical study of transliteration through bridge languages
Mitesh M. Khapra, A. Kumaran 0001, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
HLT-NAACL2
2010 Compositional Machine Transliteration
abstract
Machine transliteration is an important problem in an increasingly multilingual world, as it plays a critical role in many downstream applications, such as machine translation or crosslingual information retrieval systems. In this article, we propose compositional machine transliteration systems, where multiple transliteration components may be composed either to improve existing transliteration quality, or to enable transliteration functionality between languages even when no direct parallel names corpora exist between them. Specifically, we propose two distinct forms of composition: serial and parallel. Serial compositional system chains individual transliteration components, say, X → Y and Y → Z systems, to provide transliteration functionality, X → Z. In parallel composition evidence from multiple transliteration paths between X → Z are aggregated for improving the quality of a direct system. We demonstrate the functionality and performance benefits of the compositional methodology using a state-of-the-art machine transliteration framework in English and a set of Indian languages, namely, Hindi, Marathi, and Kannada. Finally, we underscore the utility and practicality of our compositional approach by showing that a CLIR system integrated with compositional transliteration systems performs consistently on par with, and sometimes better than, that integrated with a direct transliteration system.
A. Kumaran 0001, Mitesh M. Khapra, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process.1
2009 MINT: A Method for Effective and Scalable Mining of Named Entity Transliterations from Large Comparable Corpora
Raghavendra Udupa, K. Saravanan 0001, A. Kumaran 0001, Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi
EACL3
2008 Mining named entity transliteration equivalents from comparable corpora
abstract
No abstract available.
Raghavendra Udupa, K. Saravanan 0001, A. Kumaran 0001, Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi
CIKM3
2008 Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval System for Indian Languages
Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, A. Kumaran 0001
IJCNLP2
2008 Some Experiments in Mining Named Entity Transliteration Pairs from Comparable Corpora
K. Saravanan 0001, A. Kumaran 0001
IJCNLP2
2008 Crosslingual location search
abstract
Address geocoding, the process of finding the map location for a structured postal address, is a relatively well-studied problem. In this paper we consider the more general problem of crosslingual location search, where the queries are not limited to postal addresses, and the language and script used in the search query is different from the one in which the underlying data is stored. To the best of our knowledge, our system is the first crosslingual location search system that is able to geocode complex addresses. We use a statistical machine transliteration system to convert location names from the script of the query to that of the stored data. However, we show that it is not sufficient to simply feed the resulting transliterations into a monolingual geocoding system, as the ambiguity inherent in the conversion drastically expands the location search space and significantly lowers the quality of results. The strength of our approach lies in its integrated, end-to-end nature: we use abstraction and fuzzy search (in the text domain) to achieve maximum coverage despite transliteration ambiguities, while applying spatial constraints (in the geographic domain) to focus only on viable interpretations of the query. Our experiments with structured and unstructured queries in a set of diverse languages and scripts (Arabic, English, Hindi and Japanese) searching for locations in different regions of the world, show full crosslingual location search accuracy at levels comparable to that of commercial monolingual systems. We achieve these levels of performance using techniques that may be applied to crosslingual searches in any language/script, and over arbitrary spatial data.
Tanuja Joshi, Joseph Joy, Tobias Kellner, Udayan Khurana, A. Kumaran 0001, Vibhuti S. Sengar
SIGIR5
2007 A generic framework for machine transliteration
abstract
No abstract available.
A. Kumaran 0001, Tobias Kellner
SIGIR1
2007 Babel: a machine transliteration workbench
abstract
Machine Transliteration deals with the conversion of text strings from one orthography to another, while preserving the phonetics of the strings in the two languages. Transliteration is an important problem in machine translation or cross-lingual information retrieval, as most proper names and generic iconic terms are out-of-vocabulary words, and therefore need to be transliterated. In this demo, we present Babel, a transliteration workbench, with generic statistical learning algorithms and a scripting engine to model the transliteration process. We demonstrate quick assembly of necessary components – algorithmic modules and training scripts – for systematic experimentation of transliteration tasks in a given pair of languages.
A. Kumaran 0001, Tobias Kellner
SIGIR1
2006 On Pushing Multilingual Query Operators into Relational Engines
abstract
To effectively support today’s global economy, database systems need to manage data in multiple languages simultaneously. While current database systems do support the storage and management of multilingual data, they are not capable of querying across different natural languages. To address this lacuna, we have recently proposed two cross-lingual functionalities, LexEQUAL[13] and SemEQUAL[14], for matching multilingual names and concepts, respectively. In this paper, we investigate the native implementation of these multilingual functionalities as first-class operators on relational engines. Specifically, we propose a new multilingual storage datatype, and an associated algebra of the multilingual operators on this datatype. These components have been successfully implemented in the PostgreSQL database system, including integration of the algebra with the query optimizer and inclusion of a metric index in the access layer. Our experiments demonstrate that the performance of the native implementation is up to two orders-of-magnitude faster than the corresponding outsidethe- server implementation. Further, these multilingual additions do not adversely impact the existing functionality and performance. To the best of our knowledge, our prototype represents the first practical implementation of a crosslingual database query engine.
A. Kumaran 0001, Pavan K. Chowdary, Jayant R. Haritsa
ICDE1
2005 SemEQUAL: Multilingual Semantic Matching in Relational Systems
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
DASFAA1
2004 On semantic matching of multilingual attributes in relational systems
abstract
No abstract available.
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
CIKM1
2004 LexEQUAL: Supporting Multiscript Matching in Database Systems
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
EDBT1
2004 LexEQUAL: Supporting Multilexical Queries in SQL
abstract
Current database systems offer support for storing multilingual data, but are not capable of querying across languages, an important consideration in today's global economy. We therefore propose a new multilexical operator called LexEQUAL that extends the standard lexicographic matching in database systems to matching of text data across languages, specifically for names, which form close to twenty percent of text corpora. The implementation of the LexEQUAL operator is based on transforming matches in language space into parameterized approximate matches in the equivalent phoneme space. A detailed evaluation of our approach on a real data set shows that there exist settings of the algorithm parameters with which it is possible to achieve both good recall and precision.
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
ICDE1
2004 LexEQUAL: Multilexical Matching Operator in SQL
abstract
No abstract available.
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
SIGMOD Conference1
2003 On the Costs of Multilingualism in Database Systems
A. Kumaran 0001, Jayant R. Haritsa
VLDB1
1989 A knowledge acquisition tool for design engineering applications
E. Silverstein, John S. Kaminski, Richard Farenci, A. Kumaran 0001
IEA/AIE (2)4