Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. Bruce Berriman

dblp:21/6150 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0001-8388-534XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 33% Cloud and datacenter computing · 29% High-performance computing · 22%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.112010
Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 · SC 2010
Storage systems
data management
0.112010
Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 · SC 2010
Distributed systems › resource sharing
data sharing
0.112010
Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 · SC 2010
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system
0.112010
Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 · SC 2010
High-performance computing
scientific workflow
0.112010
Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 · SC 2010
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
cloud resource management
0.112008
The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example · SC 2008
Computational science and engineering
astronomy
0.012008
The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example · SC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2resource provisioning · 0.2shared storage · 0.1file transfer · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Using Clouds for Science, is it just Kicking the Can down the Road?
Ewa Deelman, Gideon Juve, G. Bruce Berriman
CLOSER3
2012 An Evaluation of the Cost and Performance of Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2
Gideon Juve, Ewa Deelman, G. Bruce Berriman, Benjamin P. Berman, Philip Maechling
J. Grid Comput.3
2011 Experiences Using GlideinWMS and the Corral Frontend across Cyberinfrastructures
abstract
Even with Grid technologies, the main mode of access for the current High Performance Computing and High Throughput Computing infrastructures today is logging in via ssh. This mode of access locks scientists to particular machines as it is difficult to move the codes and environments between hosts. In this paper we show how switching the resource access mode to a Condor glide in-based overlay can bring together computational resources from multiple cyber infrastructures. This approach provides scientists with a computational infrastructure anchored around the familiar environment of the desktop computer. Additionally, the approach enhances the reliability of applications and workflows by automatically rerouting jobs to functioning infrastructures. Two different science applications were used to demonstrate applicability, one from the field of astronomy and the other one from earth sciences. We demonstrate that a desktop computer is viable as a submit host and central manager for these kind of glide in overlays. However, issues of ease of use and security need to be considered.
Mats Rynge, Gideon Juve, Gaurang Mehta, Ewa Deelman, Krista Larson, Burt Holzman, Igor Sfiligoi, Frank Würthwein, G. Bruce Berriman, Scott Callaghan
eScience9
2010 Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2
abstract
Efficient data management is a key component in achieving good performance for scientific workflows in distributed environments. Workflow applications typically communicate data between tasks using files. When tasks are distributed, these files are either transferred from one computational node to another, or accessed through a shared storage system. In grids and clusters, workflow data is often stored on network and parallel file systems. In this paper we investigate some of the ways in which data can be managed for workflows in the cloud. We ran experiments using three typical workflow applications on Amazon's EC2. We discuss the various storage and file systems we used, describe the issues and problems we encountered deploying them on EC2, and analyze the resulting performance and cost of the workflows.
Gideon Juve, Ewa Deelman, Karan Vahi, Gaurang Mehta, G. Bruce Berriman, Benjamin P. Berman, Philip Maechling
SC5
2008 On the Use of Cloud Computing for Scientific Workflows
abstract
This paper explores the use of cloud computing for scientific workflows, focusing on a widely used astronomy application-Montage. The approach is to evaluate from the point of view of a scientific workflow the tradeoffs between running in a local environment, if such is available, and running in a virtual environment via remote, wide-area network resource access. Our results show that for Montage, a workflow with short job runtimes, the virtual environment can provide good compute time performance but it can suffer from resource scheduling delays and widearea communications.
Christina Hoffa, Gaurang Mehta, Timothy Freeman 0001, Ewa Deelman, Kate Keahey, G. Bruce Berriman, John Good
eScience6
2008 The cost of doing science on the cloud: the Montage example
abstract
Utility grids such as the Amazon EC2 cloud and Amazon S3 offer computational and storage resources that can be used on-demand for a fee by compute and data-intensive applications. The cost of running an application on such a cloud depends on the compute, storage and communication resources it will provision and consume. Different execution plans of the same application may result in significantly different costs. Using the Amazon cloud fee structure and a real-life astronomy application, we study via simulation the cost performance tradeoffs of different execution and resource provisioning plans. We also study these trade-offs in the context of the storage and communication fees of Amazon S3 when used for long-term application data archival. Our results show that by provisioning the right amount of storage and compute resources, cost can be significantly reduced with no significant impact on application performance.
Ewa Deelman, Miron Livny, G. Bruce Berriman, John Good
SC4
2004 Accessing and Visualizing Scientific Spatiotemporal Data
Daniel S. Katz, Attila Bergou, G. Bruce Berriman, Gary L. Block, Jim Collier, David W. Curkendall, John Good, Laura Husman, Joseph C. Jacob, Anastasia C. Laity, Peggy Li, Craig Miller, Tom Prince, Herb Siegel, Roy Williams
SSDBM3
2003 Multi-wavelength image space: another Grid-enabled science
abstract
Abstract We describe how the Grid enables new research possibilities in astronomy through multi‐wavelength images. To see sky images in the same pixel space, they must be projected to that space, a computer‐intensive process. There is thus a virtual data space induced that is defined by an image and the applied projection. This virtual data can be created and replicated with Planners and Replica catalog technology developed under the GriPhyN project. We plan to deploy our system (MONTAGE) on the U.S. Teragrid. Grid computing is also needed for ingesting data—computing background correction on each image—which forms a separate virtual data space. Multi‐wavelength images can be used for pushing source detection and statistics by an order of magnitude from current techniques; for optimization of multi‐wavelength image registration for detection and characterization of extended sources; and for detection of new classes of essentially multi‐wavelength astronomical phenomena. The paper discusses both the Grid architecture and the scientific goals. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Roy Williams, G. Bruce Berriman, Ewa Deelman, John Good, Joseph C. Jacob, Carl Kesselman, Carol Lonsdale, Seb Oliver, Thomas A. Prince
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.2