Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Darin England
dblp:21/892
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0003-3621-517XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 36% Cloud and datacenter computing · 27% Electronic design automation · 27% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
data collection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network topology |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
overlay networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A new metric for robustness with application to job scheduling · HPDC 2005 |
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A new metric for robustness with application to job scheduling · HPDC 2005 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
divisible load scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1distributed algorithm · 0.1robustness metric · 0.1backfilling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed EnvironmentsabstractLarge-scale distributed applications are subject to frequent disruptions due to resource contention and failure. Such disruptions are inherently unpredictable and, therefore, robustness is a desirable property for the distributed operating environment. In this work, we describe and evaluate a robust topology for applications that operate on a spanning tree overlay network. Unlike previous work that is adaptive or reactive in nature, we take a proactive approach to robustness. The topology itself is able to simultaneously withstand disturbances and exhibit good performance. We present both centralized and distributed algorithms to construct the topology, and then demonstrate its effectiveness through analysis and simulation of two classes of distributed applications: Data collection in sensor networks and data dissemination in divisible load scheduling. The results show that our robust spanning trees achieve a desirable trade-off for two opposing metrics where traditional forms of spanning trees do not. In particular, the trees generated by our algorithms exhibit both resilience to data loss and low power consumption for sensor networks. When used as the overlay network for divisible load scheduling, they display both robustness to link congestion and low values for the makespan of the schedule Darin England, Bharadwaj Veeravalli, Jon B. Weissman |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |
| 2005 | Supporting the dynamic grid service lifecycleabstractThis paper presents an architecture and implementation for a dynamic OGSA-based grid service architecture that extends GT3 to support dynamic service hosting - where to host and re-host a service within the grid in response to service demand and resource fluctuation. Our model goes beyond current OGSI implementations in which the service is presumed to be pre-installed at all sites (and only service instantiation is dynamic). In dynamic virtual organizations (VOs), we believe dynamic service hosting provides an important flexibility. Our model also defines several new adaptive grid service classes that support adaptation at multiple levels. Dynamic service deployment allows new services to be added or replaced without taking down a site for reconfiguration and allows a VO to respond effectively to dynamic resource availability and demand. The preliminary results suggest that the cost of dynamic installation, deployment, and invocation, is tolerable. Jon B. Weissman, Darin England |
CCGRID | 3 |
| 2005 | A new metric for robustness with application to job schedulingabstractScheduling strategies for parallel and distributed computing have mostly been oriented toward performance, while striving to achieve some notion of fairness. With the increase in size, complexity, and heterogeneity of today's computing environments, we argue that, in addition to performance metrics, scheduling algorithms should be designed for robustness. That is, they should have the ability to maintain performance under a wide variety of operating conditions. Although robustness is easy to define, there are no widely used metrics for this property. To this end, we present a methodology for characterizing and measuring the robustness of a system to a specific disturbance. The methodology is easily applied to many types of computing systems and it does not require sophisticated mathematical models. To illustrate its use, we show three applications of our technique to job scheduling; one supporting a previous result with respect to backfilling, one examining overload control in a streaming video server, and one comparing two different scheduling strategies for a distributed network service. The last example also demonstrates how consideration of robustness leads to better system design as we were able to devise a new and effective scheduling heuristic. Darin England, Jon B. Weissman, Jayashree Sadagopan |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2004 | Costs and Benefits of Load Sharing in the Computational Grid
Darin England, Jon B. Weissman |
JSSPP | 1 |
| 2003 | Integrated scheduling: the best of both worlds
Jon B. Weissman, Lakshman Rao Abburi, Darin England |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 3 |