Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Monica C. Munoz-Torres
dblp:21/9439
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8430-6039ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 70% Computational science and engineering · 18% Medical and health informatics · 12% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
biological knowledge graph |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
graph learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › graph learning
link prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GA4GH Phenopacket schema · 0.9node embedding · 0.7graph machine learning · 0.7extract-transform-load · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Oncopacket: integration of cancer research data using GA4GH phenopacketsabstractSUMMARY: Lack of data integration remains a significant impediment to cancer research, and many analyses still require customized software to transform and prepare cancer data. We describe a software package to harmonize genetic and clinical cancer data into the GA4GH Phenopacket schema, an ISO standard for representing clinical case data. We integrated demographic, mutation, morphology, diagnosis, intervention, and survival data using case data from the National Cancer Institute for 12 cancer types. The Phenopacket standard provides a foundation for downstream use, including sophisticated statistical and AI/ML analyses. We demonstrate fitness for purpose by using the integrated data to recapitulate a known association between mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and survival time in brain cancer patients. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is freely available at: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/oncopacket (archived at 10.5281/zenodo.15353125). Michael L. Sierk, Daniel Danis, Sujay Patil, Nobal Kishor, Rajdeep Mondal, Qingrong Chen, Chunhua Yan, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Daoud M. Meerzaman, Peter N. Robinson, Justin T. Reese |
Bioinform. | 9 |
| 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphsabstractMOTIVATION: Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of KGs is lacking. RESULTS: Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of KGs. Features include a simple, modular extract-transform-load pattern for producing graphs compliant with Biolink Model (a high-level data model for standardizing biological data), easy integration of any OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies) ontology, cached downloads of upstream data sources, versioned and automatically updated builds with stable URLs, web-browsable storage of KG artifacts on cloud infrastructure, and easy reuse of transformed subgraphs across projects. Current KG-Hub projects span use cases including COVID-19 research, drug repurposing, microbial-environmental interactions, and rare disease research. KG-Hub is equipped with tooling to easily analyze and manipulate KGs. KG-Hub is also tightly integrated with graph machine learning (ML) tools which allow automated graph ML, including node embeddings and training of models for link prediction and node classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://kghub.org. J. Harry Caufield, Tim E. Putman, Kevin Schaper, Deepak R. Unni, Harshad Hegde, Tiffany Callahan, Luca Cappelletti, Sierra A. T. Moxon, Vida Ravanmehr, Seth Carbon, Lauren E. Chan, Katherina G. Cortes, Kent A. Shefchek, Glass Elsarboukh, James P. Balhoff, Tommaso Fontana, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Richard M. Bruskiewich, Anne E. Thessen, Nomi L. Harris, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Melissa A. Haendel, Peter N. Robinson, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Chris Mungall, Justin T. Reese |
Bioinform. | 21 |
| 2019 | Apollo: Democratizing genome annotationabstractGenome annotation is the process of identifying the location and function of a genome's encoded features. Improving the biological accuracy of annotation is a complex and iterative process requiring researchers to review and incorporate multiple sources of information such as transcriptome alignments, predictive models based on sequence profiles, and comparisons to features found in related organisms. Because rapidly decreasing costs are enabling an ever-growing number of scientists to incorporate sequencing as a routine laboratory technique, there is widespread demand for tools that can assist in the deliberative analytical review of genomic information. To this end, we present Apollo, an open source software package that enables researchers to efficiently inspect and refine the precise structure and role of genomic features in a graphical browser-based platform. Some of Apollo's newer user interface features include support for real-time collaboration, allowing distributed users to simultaneously edit the same encoded features while also instantly seeing the updates made by other researchers on the same region in a manner similar to Google Docs. Its technical architecture enables Apollo to be integrated into multiple existing genomic analysis pipelines and heterogeneous laboratory workflow platforms. Finally, we consider the implications that Apollo and related applications may have on how the results of genome research are published and made accessible. Nathan A. Dunn, Deepak R. Unni, Colin M. Diesh, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Nomi L. Harris, Eric Yao, Helena Rasche, Ian H. Holmes, Christine G. Elsik, Suzanna Lewis |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2019 | A quick guide for student-driven community genome annotationabstractHigh quality gene models are necessary to expand the molecular and genetic tools available for a target organism, but these are available for only a handful of model organisms that have undergone extensive curation and experimental validation over the course of many years. The majority of gene models present in biological databases today have been identified in draft genome assemblies using automated annotation pipelines that are frequently based on orthologs from distantly related model organisms and usually have minor or major errors. Manual curation is time consuming and often requires substantial expertise, but is instrumental in improving gene model structure and identification. Manual annotation may seem to be a daunting and cost-prohibitive task for small research communities but involving undergraduates in community genome annotation consortiums can be mutually beneficial for both education and improved genomic resources. We outline a workflow for efficient manual annotation driven by a team of primarily undergraduate annotators. This model can be scaled to large teams and includes quality control processes through incremental evaluation. Moreover, it gives students an opportunity to increase their understanding of genome biology and to participate in scientific research in collaboration with peers and senior researchers at multiple institutions. Prashant S. Hosmani, Teresa Shippy, Sherry Miller, Joshua B. Benoit, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Mirella Flores, Lukas A. Mueller, Helen Wiersma-Koch, Tom D'Elia, Susan J. Brown, Surya Saha |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 5 |
| 2019 | Ten quick tips for biocuration
Y. Amy Tang, Klemens Pichler, Anja Füllgrabe, Jane Lomax, James Malone, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Drashtti Vasant, Eleanor Williams, Melissa A. Haendel |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2016 | The 2015 Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC 2015)abstractThe Bioinformatics Open Source Conference (BOSC) is organized by the Open Bioinformatics Foundation (OBF), a nonprofit group dedicated to promoting the practice and philosophy of open source software development and open science within the biological research community. Since its inception in 2000, BOSC has provided bioinformatics developers with a forum for communicating the results of their latest efforts to the wider research community. BOSC offers a focused environment for developers and users to interact and share ideas about standards; software development practices; practical techniques for solving bioinformatics problems; and approaches that promote open science and sharing of data, results, and software. BOSC is run as a two-day special interest group (SIG) before the annual Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology (ISMB) conference. BOSC 2015 took place in Dublin, Ireland, and was attended by over 125 people, about half of whom were first-time attendees. Session topics included "Data Science;" "Standards and Interoperability;" "Open Science and Reproducibility;" "Translational Bioinformatics;" "Visualization;" and "Bioinformatics Open Source Project Updates". In addition to two keynote talks and dozens of shorter talks chosen from submitted abstracts, BOSC 2015 included a panel, titled "Open Source, Open Door: Increasing Diversity in the Bioinformatics Open Source Community," that provided an opportunity for open discussion about ways to increase the diversity of participants in BOSC in particular, and in open source bioinformatics in general. The complete program of BOSC 2015 is available online at http://www.open-bio.org/wiki/BOSC_2015_Schedule. Nomi L. Harris, Peter J. A. Cock, Hilmar Lapp, Brad A. Chapman, Rob Davey, Christopher J. Fields, Karsten Hokamp, Monica C. Munoz-Torres |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 8 |