Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anant Subramanian

dblp:210/0836 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text analysis
keyword extraction
0.412020
Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.412020
Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020
Information retrieval › web search
search engine optimization
0.412020
Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312018
SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddings · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable representation
0.312018
SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddings · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.312018
SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddings · AAAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logistic regression · 0.4XGBoost · 0.4denoising k-sparse autoencoders · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization
abstract
Understanding content at scale is a difficult but important problem for many platforms. Many previous studies focus on content understanding to optimize engagement with existing users. However, little work studies how to leverage better content understanding to attract new users. In this work, we build a framework for generating natural language content annotations and show how they can be used for search engine optimization. The proposed framework relies on an XGBoost model that labels “pins” with high probability phrases, and a logistic regression layer that learns to rank aggregated annotations for groups of content. The pipeline identifies keywords that are descriptive and contextually meaningful. We perform a large-scale production experiment deployed on the Pinterest platform and show that natural language annotations cause a 1-2% increase in traffic from leading search engines. This increase is statistically significant. Finally, we explore and interpret the characteristics of our annotations framework.
Porter Jenkins, Jennifer Zhao, Heath Vinicombe, Anant Subramanian, Arun Prasad, Atillia Dobi, Eileen Li, Yunsong Guo
WWW4
2018 SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddings
abstract
Prediction without justification has limited utility. Much of the success of neural models can be attributed to their ability to learn rich, dense and expressive representations. While these representations capture the underlying complexity and latent trends in the data, they are far from being interpretable. We propose a novel variant of denoising k-sparse autoencoders that generates highly efficient and interpretable distributed word representations (word embeddings), beginning with existing word representations from state-of-the-art methods like GloVe and word2vec. Through large scale human evaluation, we report that our resulting word embedddings are much more interpretable than the original GloVe and word2vec embeddings. Moreover, our embeddings outperform existing popular word embeddings on a diverse suite of benchmark downstream tasks.
Anant Subramanian, Danish Pruthi, Harsh Jhamtani, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Eduard H. Hovy
AAAI1