VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Darryl Hannan
dblp:210/1010
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Generative modeling · 18% Vision and language · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › ultrasound imaging
ultrasound diagnosis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MobilePTX: Sparse Coding for Pneumothorax Detection Given Limited Training Examples · AAAI 2023 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MobilePTX: Sparse Coding for Pneumothorax Detection Given Limited Training Examples · AAAI 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
story completion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | StoryDALL-E: Adapting Pretrained Text-to-Image Transformers for Story Continuation · ECCV (37) 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | StoryDALL-E: Adapting Pretrained Text-to-Image Transformers for Story Continuation · ECCV (37) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multimodal question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputs · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically inspired neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Sparse Coding for Invariant Multimodal Halle Berry Neurons · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Sparse Coding for Invariant Multimodal Halle Berry Neurons · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Sparse Coding for Invariant Multimodal Halle Berry Neurons · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Sparse Coding for Invariant Multimodal Halle Berry Neurons · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data-efficient learning
small-data learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | MobilePTX: Sparse Coding for Pneumothorax Detection Given Limited Training Examples · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
low-resource domain adaptation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse Inputs · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
small-data classifier · 2.0YOLOv4 · 2.03d sparse coding · 2.0transfer learning · 0.4pre-trained unimodal QA models · 0.4modality selector network · 0.4top-down feedback · 0.3sparse coding · 0.3multimodal integration · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FMG-Det: Foundation Model Guided Robust Object DetectionabstractCollecting high quality data for object detection tasks is challenging due to the inherent subjectivity in labeling the boundaries of an object. This makes it difficult to not only collect consistent annotations across a dataset but also to validate them, as no two annotators are likely to label the same object using the exact same coordinates. These challenges are further compounded when object boundaries are partially visible or blurred, which can be the case in many domains. Training on noisy annotations significantly degrades detector performance, rendering them unusable, particularly in few-shot settings, where just a few corrupted annotations can impact model performance. In this work, we propose FMG-Det, a simple, efficient methodology for training models with noisy annotations. More specifically, we propose combining a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework with a pre-processing pipeline that leverages powerful foundation models to correct labels prior to training. This pre-processing pipeline, along with slight modifications to the detector head, results in state-of-the-art performance across a number of datasets, for both standard and few-shot scenarios, while being much simpler and more efficient than other approaches. Darryl Hannan, Timothy Doster, Henry Kvinge, Adam Attarian, Yijing Watkins |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2023 | MobilePTX: Sparse Coding for Pneumothorax Detection Given Limited Training ExamplesabstractPoint-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) refers to clinician-performed and interpreted ultrasonography at the patient's bedside. Interpreting these images requires a high level of expertise, which may not be available during emergencies. In this paper, we support POCUS by developing classifiers that can aid medical professionals by diagnosing whether or not a patient has pneumothorax. We decomposed the task into multiple steps, using YOLOv4 to extract relevant regions of the video and a 3D sparse coding model to represent video features. Given the difficulty in acquiring positive training videos, we trained a small-data classifier with a maximum of 15 positive and 32 negative examples. To counteract this limitation, we leveraged subject matter expert (SME) knowledge to limit the hypothesis space, thus reducing the cost of data collection. We present results using two lung ultrasound datasets and demonstrate that our model is capable of achieving performance on par with SMEs in pneumothorax identification. We then developed an iOS application that runs our full system in less than 4 seconds on an iPad Pro, and less than 8 seconds on an iPhone 13 Pro, labeling key regions in the lung sonogram to provide interpretable diagnoses. Darryl Hannan, Steven C. Nesbit, Ximing Wen, Glen Smith, Alberto Goffi, Michael J. Morris, John C. Hunninghake, Nicholas E. Villalobos, Edward Kim 0006, Rosina O. Weber, Christopher J. MacLellan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | StoryDALL-E: Adapting Pretrained Text-to-Image Transformers for Story Continuation
Adyasha Maharana, Darryl Hannan, Mohit Bansal |
ECCV (37) | 2 |
| 2021 | Improving Generation and Evaluation of Visual Stories via Semantic ConsistencyabstractStory visualization is an underexplored task that falls at the intersection of many important research directions in both computer vision and natural language processing.In this task, given a series of natural language captions which compose a story, an agent must generate a sequence of images that correspond to the captions.Prior work has introduced recurrent generative models which outperform text-to-image synthesis models on this task.However, there is room for improvement of generated images in terms of visual quality, coherence and relevance.We present a number of improvements to prior modeling approaches, including (1) the addition of a dual learning framework that utilizes video captioning to reinforce the semantic alignment between the story and generated images, (2) a copy-transform mechanism for sequentiallyconsistent story visualization, and (3) MARTbased transformers to model complex interactions between frames.We present ablation studies to demonstrate the effect of each of these techniques on the generative power of the model for both individual images as well as the entire narrative.Furthermore, due to the complexity and generative nature of the task, standard evaluation metrics do not accurately reflect performance.Therefore, we also provide an exploration of evaluation metrics for the model, focused on aspects of the generated frames such as the presence/quality of generated characters, the relevance to captions, and the diversity of the generated images.We also present correlation experiments of our proposed automated metrics with human evaluations.1 Adyasha Maharana, Darryl Hannan, Mohit Bansal |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2020 | ManyModalQA: Modality Disambiguation and QA over Diverse InputsabstractWe present a new multimodal question answering challenge, ManyModalQA, in which an agent must answer a question by considering three distinct modalities: text, images, and tables. We collect our data by scraping Wikipedia and then utilize crowdsourcing to collect question-answer pairs. Our questions are ambiguous, in that the modality that contains the answer is not easily determined based solely upon the question. To demonstrate this ambiguity, we construct a modality selector (or disambiguator) network, and this model gets substantially lower accuracy on our challenge set, compared to existing datasets, indicating that our questions are more ambiguous. By analyzing this model, we investigate which words in the question are indicative of the modality. Next, we construct a simple baseline ManyModalQA model, which, based on the prediction from the modality selector, fires a corresponding pre-trained state-of-the-art unimodal QA model. We focus on providing the community with a new manymodal evaluation set and only provide a fine-tuning set, with the expectation that existing datasets and approaches will be transferred for most of the training, to encourage low-resource generalization without large, monolithic training sets for each new task. There is a significant gap between our baseline models and human performance; therefore, we hope that this challenge encourages research in end-to-end modality disambiguation and multimodal QA models, as well as transfer learning. Darryl Hannan, Mohit Bansal |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Deep Sparse Coding for Invariant Multimodal Halle Berry NeuronsabstractDeep feed-forward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become ubiquitous in virtually all machine learning and computer vision challenges; however, advancements in CNNs have arguably reached an engineering saturation point where incremental novelty results in minor performance gains. Although there is evidence that object classification has reached human levels on narrowly defined tasks, for general applications, the biological visual system is far superior to that of any computer. Research reveals there are numerous missing components in feed-forward deep neural networks that are critical in mammalian vision. The brain does not work solely in a feed-forward fashion, but rather all of the neurons are in competition with each other; neurons are integrating information in a bottom up and top down fashion and incorporating expectation and feedback in the modeling process. Furthermore, our visual cortex is working in tandem with our parietal lobe, integrating sensory information from various modalities. Edward Kim 0006, Darryl Hannan, Garrett T. Kenyon |
CVPR | 2 |