VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefanos Angelidis
dblp:210/2223
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3027-9690ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 72% Information extraction and text analysis · 24% Generative modeling · 3% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 67% Knowledge graphs · 20% Machine learning and data management · 13% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
opinion summarization |
1.8 | 4 | 2021 | Aspect-Controllable Opinion Summarization · EMNLP (1) 2021 Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning · AAAI 2021 OpinionDigest: A Simple Framework for Opinion Summarization · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
content planning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Aspect-Controllable Opinion Summarization · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Data mining › text mining
sentiment analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Constructing Explainable Opinion Graphs from Reviews · WWW 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
aspect-based sentiment analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | OpinionDigest: A Simple Framework for Opinion Summarization · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › aspect-based sentiment analysis
aspect extraction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Summarizing Opinions: Aspect Extraction Meets Sentiment Prediction and They Are Both Weakly Supervised · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Summarizing Opinions: Aspect Extraction Meets Sentiment Prediction and They Are Both Weakly Supervised · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic data generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning · AAAI 2021 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Constructing Explainable Opinion Graphs from Reviews · WWW 2021 |
Machine learning and data management
weak supervision |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Summarizing Opinions: Aspect Extraction Meets Sentiment Prediction and They Are Both Weakly Supervised · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple instance learning · 0.7multi-task learning · 0.7pretrained language model fine-tuning · 0.5multi-instance learning · 0.5latent variable model · 0.5explainability · 0.5dirichlet distribution sampling · 0.5transformer · 0.4abstractive summarization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content PlanningabstractThe recent success of deep learning techniques for abstractive summarization is predicated on the availability of large-scale datasets. When summarizing reviews (e.g., for products or movies), such training data is neither available nor can be easily sourced, motivating the development of methods which rely on synthetic datasets for supervised training. We show that explicitly incorporating content planning in a summarization model not only yields output of higher quality, but also allows the creation of synthetic datasets which are more natural, resembling real world document-summary pairs. Our content plans take the form of aspect and sentiment distributions which we induce from data without access to expensive annotations. Synthetic datasets are created by sampling pseudo-reviews from a Dirichlet distribution parametrized by our content planner, while our model generates summaries based on input reviews and induced content plans. Experimental results on three domains show that our approach outperforms competitive models in generating informative, coherent, and fluent summaries that capture opinion consensus. Reinald Kim Amplayo, Stefanos Angelidis, Mirella Lapata |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2021 | Aspect-Controllable Opinion SummarizationabstractRecent work on opinion summarization produces general summaries based on a set of input reviews and the popularity of opinions expressed in them.In this paper, we propose an approach that allows the generation of customized summaries based on aspect queries (e.g., describing the location and room of a hotel).Using a review corpus, we create a synthetic training dataset of (review, summary) pairs enriched with aspect controllers which are induced by a multi-instance learning model that predicts the aspects of a document at different levels of granularity.We fine-tune a pretrained model using our synthetic dataset and generate aspect-specific summaries by modifying the aspect controllers.Experiments on two benchmarks show that our model outperforms the previous state of the art and generates personalized summaries by controlling the number of aspects discussed in them. Reinald Kim Amplayo, Stefanos Angelidis, Mirella Lapata |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Constructing Explainable Opinion Graphs from ReviewsabstractThe Web is a major resource of both factual and subjective information. While there are significant efforts to organize factual information into knowledge bases, there is much less work on organizing opinions, which are abundant in subjective data, into a structured format. Nofar Carmeli, Xiaolan Wang 0001, Yoshihiko Suhara, Stefanos Angelidis, Yuliang Li 0001, Wang Chiew Tan |
WWW | 4 |
| 2021 | Extractive Opinion Summarization in Quantized Transformer SpacesabstractAbstract We present the Quantized Transformer (QT), an unsupervised system for extractive opinion summarization. QT is inspired by Vector- Quantized Variational Autoencoders, which we repurpose for popularity-driven summarization. It uses a clustering interpretation of the quantized space and a novel extraction algorithm to discover popular opinions among hundreds of reviews, a significant step towards opinion summarization of practical scope. In addition, QT enables controllable summarization without further training, by utilizing properties of the quantized space to extract aspect-specific summaries. We also make publicly available Space, a large-scale evaluation benchmark for opinion summarizers, comprising general and aspect-specific summaries for 50 hotels. Experiments demonstrate the promise of our approach, which is validated by human studies where judges showed clear preference for our method over competitive baselines. Stefanos Angelidis, Reinald Kim Amplayo, Yoshihiko Suhara, Xiaolan Wang 0001, Mirella Lapata |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2020 | OpinionDigest: A Simple Framework for Opinion SummarizationabstractWe present OPINIONDIGEST, an abstractive opinion summarization framework, which does not rely on gold-standard summaries for training.The framework uses an Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis model to extract opinion phrases from reviews, and trains a Transformer model to reconstruct the original reviews from these extractions.At summarization time, we merge extractions from multiple reviews and select the most popular ones.The selected opinions are used as input to the trained Transformer model, which verbalizes them into an opinion summary.OPINIONDIGEST can also generate customized summaries, tailored to specific user needs, by filtering the selected opinions according to their aspect and/or sentiment.Automatic evaluation on YELP data shows that our framework outperforms competitive baselines.Human studies on two corpora verify that OPINIONDIGEST produces informative summaries and shows promising customization capabilities 1 . Yoshihiko Suhara, Xiaolan Wang 0001, Stefanos Angelidis, Wang Chiew Tan |
ACL | 3 |
| 2018 | Summarizing Opinions: Aspect Extraction Meets Sentiment Prediction and They Are Both Weakly SupervisedabstractWe present a neural framework for opinion summarization from online product reviews which is knowledge-lean and only requires light supervision (e.g., in the form of product domain labels and user-provided ratings).Our method combines two weakly supervised components to identify salient opinions and form extractive summaries from multiple reviews: an aspect extractor trained under a multi-task objective, and a sentiment predictor based on multiple instance learning.We introduce an opinion summarization dataset that includes a training set of product reviews from six diverse domains and human-annotated development and test sets with gold standard aspect annotations, salience labels, and opinion summaries.Automatic evaluation shows significant improvements over baselines, and a largescale study indicates that our opinion summaries are preferred by human judges according to multiple criteria.1 Stefanos Angelidis, Mirella Lapata |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2018 | Multiple Instance Learning Networks for Fine-Grained Sentiment AnalysisabstractWe consider the task of fine-grained sentiment analysis from the perspective of multiple instance learning (MIL). Our neural model is trained on document sentiment labels, and learns to predict the sentiment of text segments, i.e. sentences or elementary discourse units (EDUs), without segment-level supervision. We introduce an attention-based polarity scoring method for identifying positive and negative text snippets and a new dataset which we call SpoT (as shorthand for Segment-level POlariTy annotations) for evaluating MIL-style sentiment models like ours. Experimental results demonstrate superior performance against multiple baselines, whereas a judgement elicitation study shows that EDU-level opinion extraction produces more informative summaries than sentence-based alternatives. Stefanos Angelidis, Mirella Lapata |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |