Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stéphane Rivaud

dblp:210/2626 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 58% Efficient and distributed learning · 42%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation
1.522025
PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures · ICLR 2025
Can Forward Gradient Match Backpropagation? · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.912025
PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network
0.912025
PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism
0.912025
PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures · ICLR 2025
Compilers and program optimization
automatic differentiation
0.312025
PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reversible architecture · 1.7autograd · 1.7local auxiliary networks · 0.7forward-mode differentiation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Growth strategies for arbitrary DAG neural architectures
abstract
Deep learning has shown impressive results, obtained at the cost of training huge neural networks.However, the larger the architecture, the higher the computational, financial, and environmental costs during training and inference.We aim at reducing both training and inference durations.We focus on Neural Architecture Growth, which can increase the size of a small model when needed, directly during training using information from the backpropagation.We expand existing work and freely grow neural networks in the form of any Directed Acyclic Graph.We design strategies that reduce excessive computations and steer network growth toward more parameter-efficient architectures.
Stella Douka, Manon Verbockhaven, Théo Rudkiewicz, Stéphane Rivaud, François P. Landes, Sylvain Chevallier, Guillaume Charpiat
ESANN4
2025 PETRA: Parallel End-to-end Training with Reversible Architectures
abstract
Reversible architectures have been shown to be capable of performing on par with their non-reversible architectures, being applied in deep learning for memory savings and generative modeling. In this work, we show how reversible architectures can solve challenges in parallelizing deep model training. We introduce PETRA, a novel alternative to backpropagation for parallelizing gradient computations. PETRA facilitates effective model parallelism by enabling stages (i.e., a set of layers) to compute independently on different devices, while only needing to communicate activations and gradients between each other. By decoupling the forward and backward passes and keeping a single updated version of the parameters, the need for weight stashing is also removed. We develop a custom autograd-like training framework for PETRA, and we demonstrate its effectiveness on standard computer vision benchmarks, achieving competitive accuracies comparable to backpropagation using ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and ResNet-50 models.
Stéphane Rivaud, Louis Fournier, Thomas Pumir, Eugene Belilovsky, Michael Eickenberg, Edouard Oyallon
ICLR1
2023 Can Forward Gradient Match Backpropagation?
abstract
Forward Gradients - the idea of using directional derivatives in forward differentiation mode - have recently been shown to be utilizable for neural network training while avoiding problems generally associated with backpropagation gradient computation, such as locking and memorization requirements. The cost is the requirement to guess the step direction, which is hard in high dimensions. While current solutions rely on weighted averages over isotropic guess vector distributions, we propose to strongly bias our gradient guesses in directions that are much more promising, such as feedback obtained from small, local auxiliary networks. For a standard computer vision neural network, we conduct a rigorous study systematically covering a variety of combinations of gradient targets and gradient guesses, including those previously presented in the literature. We find that using gradients obtained from a local loss as a candidate direction drastically improves on random noise in Forward Gradient methods.
Louis Fournier, Stéphane Rivaud, Eugene Belilovsky, Michael Eickenberg, Edouard Oyallon
ICML2