Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Kongrath Suankaewmanee

dblp:211/6757 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Edge and fog computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › consensus protocol
proof-of-work
0.412019
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
resource allocation
0.412019
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing
auction mechanisms
0.412019
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
cloud resource allocation
0.412019
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019
Edge and fog computing › mobile edge computing
computation offloading
0.112019
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mechanism design · 1.1game theory · 1.1auction theory · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimization of Resource Usage in Blockchain Networks to Meet High Throughput: A Hybrid Pull-and-Push-Based Approach
Kongrath Suankaewmanee, Passakorn Pannok, Dusit Niyato
WCNC1
2019 Re-Route Package Pickup and Delivery Planning with Random Demands
abstract
Recently, a higher competition in logistics business introduces new challenges to the vehicle routing problem (VRP). Re-route planning, also known as dynamic VRP, is one of the important challenges. The re-route planning has to be performed when new customers request for deliveries while the delivery vehicles, i.e., trucks, are serving other customers. While the re-route planning has been studied in the literature, most of the existing works do not consider different uncertainties. Therefore, in this paper, we propose two systems, i.e., (i) an offline package pickup and delivery planning with stochastic demands (PDPSD) and (ii) a re-route package pickup and delivery planning with stochastic demands (Re-route PDPSD). Accordingly, we formulate the PDPSD system as a two-stage stochastic optimization. We then extend the PDPSD system to the Re-route PDPSD system with a re-route algorithm. Furthermore, we evaluate performance of the proposed systems by using the dataset from Solomon Benchmark suite and a real data from a Singapore logistics 1company. The results show that the PDPSD system can achieve the lower cost than that of the baseline model. In addition, the Re-route PDPSD system can help the supplier efficiently and successfully to serve more customers while the trucks are already on the road.
Suttinee Sawadsitang, Dusit Niyato, Kongrath Suankaewmanee, Puay Siew Tan
VTC Fall3
2019 Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks
abstract
As an emerging decentralized secure data management platform, blockchain has gained much popularity recently. To maintain a canonical state of blockchain data record, proof-of-work based consensus protocols provide the nodes, referred to as miners, in the network with incentives for confirming new block of transactions through a process of “block mining” by solving a cryptographic puzzle. Under the circumstance of limited local computing resources, e.g., mobile devices, it is natural for rational miners, i.e., consensus nodes, to offload computational tasks for proof of work to the cloud/fog computing servers. Therefore, we focus on the trading between the cloud/fog computing service provider and miners, and propose an auction-based market model for efficient computing resource allocation. In particular, we consider a proof-of-work based blockchain network, which is constrained by the computing resource and deployed as an infrastructure for decentralized data management applications. Due to the competition among miners in the blockchain network, the allocative externalities are particularly taken into account when designing the auction mechanisms. Specifically, we consider two bidding schemes: the constant-demand scheme where each miner bids for a fixed quantity of resources, and the multi-demand scheme where the miners can submit their preferable demands and bids. For the constant-demand bidding scheme, we propose an auction mechanism that achieves optimal social welfare. In the multi-demand bidding scheme, the social welfare maximization problem is NP-hard. Therefore, we design an approximate algorithm which guarantees the truthfulness, individual rationality and computational efficiency. Through extensive simulations, we show that our proposed auction mechanisms with the two bidding schemes can efficiently maximize the social welfare of the blockchain network and provide effective strategies for the cloud/fog computing service provider.
Yutao Jiao, Ping Wang 0001, Dusit Niyato, Kongrath Suankaewmanee
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.4