VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhinav Moudgil
dblp:211/6792
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Vision and language · 13% Optimization for machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
associative recall |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding Input Selectivity in Mamba: Impact on Approximation Power, Memorization, and Associative Recall Capacity · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
learned update rules |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
neural network training acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding Input Selectivity in Mamba: Impact on Approximation Power, Memorization, and Associative Recall Capacity · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Scaling Difference Target Propagation by Learning Backprop Targets · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrast and Classify: Training Robust VQA Models · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene modeling › scene representation
object-centric scene representation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-and-language navigation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrast and Classify: Training Robust VQA Models · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Scaling Difference Target Propagation by Learning Backprop Targets · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight nowcasting · 0.9theoretical construction · 0.9haar wavelet analysis · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9gauss-newton optimization · 0.6difference target propagation · 0.6scene classification network · 0.5object detector · 0.5data augmentation · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Accelerating Training with Neuron Interaction and Nowcasting NetworksabstractNeural network training can be accelerated when a learnable update rule is used in lieu of classic adaptive optimizers (e.g. Adam). However, learnable update rules can be costly and unstable to train and use. Recently, Jang et al. (2023) proposed a simpler approach to accelerate training based on weight nowcaster networks (WNNs). In their approach, Adam is used for most of the optimization steps and periodically, only every few steps, a WNN nowcasts (predicts near future) parameters. We improve WNNs by proposing neuron interaction and nowcasting (NiNo) networks. In contrast to WNNs, NiNo leverages neuron connectivity and graph neural networks to more accurately nowcast parameters. We further show that in some networks, such as Transformers, modeling neuron connectivity accurately is challenging. We address this and other limitations, which allows NiNo to accelerate Adam training by up to 50% in vision and language tasks. Boris Knyazev 0001, Abhinav Moudgil, Guillaume Lajoie, Eugene Belilovsky, Simon Lacoste-Julien |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Understanding Input Selectivity in Mamba: Impact on Approximation Power, Memorization, and Associative Recall CapacityabstractState-Space Models (SSMs), and particularly Mamba, have recently emerged as a promising alternative to Transformers. Mamba introduces input selectivity to its SSM layer (S6) and incorporates convolution and gating into its block definition. While these modifications do improve Mamba’s performance over its SSM predecessors, it remains largely unclear how Mamba leverages the additional functionalities provided by input selectivity, and how these interact with the other operations in the Mamba architecture. In this work, we demystify the role of input selectivity in Mamba, investigating its impact on function approximation power, long-term memorization, and associative recall capabilities. In particular: (i) we prove that the S6 layer of Mamba can represent projections onto Haar wavelets, providing an edge over its Diagonal SSM (S4D) predecessor in approximating discontinuous functions commonly arising in practice; (ii) we show how the S6 layer can dynamically counteract memory decay; (iii) we provide analytical solutions to the MQAR associative recall task using the Mamba architecture with different mixers — Mamba, Mamba-2, and S4D. We demonstrate the tightness of our theoretical constructions with empirical results on concrete tasks. Our findings offer a mechanistic understanding of Mamba and reveal opportunities for improvement. Ningyuan Huang, Miguel Sarabia, Abhinav Moudgil, Pau Rodríguez, Luca Zappella, Federico Danieli |
ICML | 3 |
| 2022 | Towards Scaling Difference Target Propagation by Learning Backprop TargetsabstractThe development of biologically-plausible learning algorithms is important for understanding learning in the brain, but most of them fail to scale-up to real-world tasks, limiting their potential as explanations for learning by real brains. As such, it is important to explore learning algorithms that come with strong theoretical guarantees and can match the performance of backpropagation (BP) on complex tasks. One such algorithm is Difference Target Propagation (DTP), a biologically-plausible learning algorithm whose close relation with Gauss-Newton (GN) optimization has been recently established. However, the conditions under which this connection rigorously holds preclude layer-wise training of the feedback pathway synaptic weights (which is more biologically plausible). Moreover, good alignment between DTP weight updates and loss gradients is only loosely guaranteed and under very specific conditions for the architecture being trained. In this paper, we propose a novel feedback weight training scheme that ensures both that DTP approximates BP and that layer-wise feedback weight training can be restored without sacrificing any theoretical guarantees. Our theory is corroborated by experimental results and we report the best performance ever achieved by DTP on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 32x32. Maxence Ernoult, Fabrice Normandin, Abhinav Moudgil, Sean Spinney, Eugene Belilovsky, Irina Rish, Blake A. Richards, Yoshua Bengio |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Contrast and Classify: Training Robust VQA ModelsabstractRecent Visual Question Answering (VQA) models have shown impressive performance on the VQA benchmark but remain sensitive to small linguistic variations in input questions. Existing approaches address this by augmenting the dataset with question paraphrases from visual question generation models or adversarial perturbations. These approaches use the combined data to learn an answer classifier by minimizing the standard cross-entropy loss. To more effectively leverage augmented data, we build on the recent success in contrastive learning. We propose a novel training paradigm (ConClaT) that optimizes both cross-entropy and contrastive losses. The contrastive loss encourages representations to be robust to linguistic variations in questions while the cross-entropy loss preserves the discriminative power of representations for answer prediction.We find that optimizing both losses – either alternately or jointly – is key to effective training. On the VQA-Rephrasings [44] benchmark, which measures the VQA model’s answer consistency across human paraphrases of a question, ConClaT improves Consensus Score by 1.63% over an improved baseline. In addition, on the standard VQA 2.0 benchmark, we improve the VQA accuracy by 0.78% overall. We also show that ConClaT is agnostic to the type of data-augmentation strategy used. Yash Kant, Abhinav Moudgil, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, Harsh Agrawal |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | SOAT: A Scene- and Object-Aware Transformer for Vision-and-Language NavigationabstractNatural language instructions for visual navigation often use scene descriptions (e.g., bedroom) and object references (e.g., green chairs) to provide a breadcrumb trail to a goal location. This work presents a transformer-based vision-and-language navigation (VLN) agent that uses two different visual encoders -- a scene classification network and an object detector -- which produce features that match these two distinct types of visual cues. In our method, scene features contribute high-level contextual information that supports object-level processing. With this design, our model is able to use vision-and-language pretraining (i.e., learning the alignment between images and text from large-scale web data) to substantially improve performance on the Room-to-Room (R2R) and Room-Across-Room (RxR) benchmarks. Specifically, our approach leads to improvements of 1.8% absolute in SPL on R2R and 3.7% absolute in SR on RxR. Our analysis reveals even larger gains for navigation instructions that contain six or more object references, which further suggests that our approach is better able to use object features and align them to references in the instructions. Abhinav Moudgil, Arjun Majumdar, Harsh Agrawal, Stefan Lee, Dhruv Batra |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Exploring 3 R's of Long-term Tracking: Re-detection, Recovery and ReliabilityabstractRecent works have proposed several long term tracking benchmarks and highlight the importance of moving towards long-duration tracking to bridge the gap with application requirements. The current evaluation methodologies, however, do not focus on several aspects that are crucial in a long term perspective like Re-detection, Recovery, and Reliability. In this paper, we propose novel evaluation strategies for a more in-depth analysis of trackers from a long-term perspective. More specifically, (a) we test redetection capability of the trackers in the wild by simulating virtual cuts, (b) we investigate the role of chance in the recovery of tracker after failure and (c) we propose a novel metric allowing visual inference on the ability of a tracker to track contiguously (without any failure) at a given accuracy. We present several original insights derived from an extensive set of quantitative and qualitative experiments. Shyamgopal Karthik, Abhinav Moudgil, Vineet Gandhi |
WACV | 2 |
| 2018 | Long-Term Visual Object Tracking Benchmark
Abhinav Moudgil, Vineet Gandhi |
ACCV (2) | 1 |