Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tobias Lindaaker
dblp:211/6985
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Graph data management · 55% Data models and query languages · 45% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data models and query languages
graph query language |
1.6 | 4 | 2022 | Graph Pattern Matching in GQL and SQL/PGQ · SIGMOD Conference 2022 Updating Graph Databases with Cypher · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 Cypher: An Evolving Query Language for Property Graphs · SIGMOD Conference 2018 |
Graph data management
graph pattern matching |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Graph Pattern Matching in GQL and SQL/PGQ · SIGMOD Conference 2022 Cypher: An Evolving Query Language for Property Graphs · SIGMOD Conference 2018 |
Graph data management
graph view |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph Pattern Matching in GQL and SQL/PGQ · SIGMOD Conference 2022 |
Graph data management › graph data model
property graph |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph Pattern Matching in GQL and SQL/PGQ · SIGMOD Conference 2022 |
Data models and query languages › graph query language › property graph query language
cypher |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Cypher: An Evolving Query Language for Property Graphs · SIGMOD Conference 2018 |
Data models and query languages › graph query language
property graph query language |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Cypher: An Evolving Query Language for Property Graphs · SIGMOD Conference 2018 |
Graph data management › graph database
property graph databases |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Updating Graph Databases with Cypher · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user consultation · 0.4query language design · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Graph Pattern Matching in GQL and SQL/PGQabstractAs graph databases become widespread, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) have approved a project to create GQL, a standard property graph query language. This complements the SQL/PGQ project, which specifies how to define graph views over a SQL tabular schema, and to run read-only queries against them. Alin Deutsch, Nadime Francis, Alastair Green, Keith W. Hare, Leonid Libkin, Tobias Lindaaker, Victor Marsault, Wim Martens, Jan Michels, Filip Murlak, Stefan Plantikow, Petra Selmer, Oskar van Rest, Hannes Voigt, Domagoj Vrgoc, Mingxi Wu, Fred Zemke |
SIGMOD Conference | 7 |
| 2021 | Path Indexing in the Cypher Query Pipeline
Jochem Kuijpers, George Fletcher 0001, Tobias Lindaaker, Nikolay Yakovets |
EDBT | 3 |
| 2019 | An Experimental Study of Context-Free Path Query Evaluation MethodsabstractContext-free path queries extend regular path queries for increased expressiveness. A context-free grammar is used to recognize accepted paths by their label strings, or traces. Such queries arise naturally in graph analytics, e.g., in bioinformatics applications. Currently, the practical performance of methods for context-free path query evaluation is not well understood. In this work, we study three state of the art context-free path query evaluation methods. We measure the performance of these methods on diverse query workloads on various data sets and compare their results. We showcase how these evaluation methods scale as graphs get bigger and queries become larger or more ambiguous. We conclude that state of the art solutions are not able to cope with large graphs as found in practice. Jochem Kuijpers, George Fletcher 0001, Nikolay Yakovets, Tobias Lindaaker |
SSDBM | 4 |
| 2019 | Updating Graph Databases with CypherabstractThe paper describes the present and the future of graph updates in Cypher, the language of the Neo4j property graph database and several other products. Update features include those with clear analogs in relational databases, as well as those that do not correspond to any relational operators. Moreover, unlike SQL, Cypher updates can be arbitrarily intertwined with querying clauses. After presenting the current state of update features, we point out their shortcomings, most notably violations of atomicity and non-deterministic behavior of updates. These have not been previously known in the Cypher community. We then describe the industry-academia collaboration on designing a revised set of Cypher update operations. Based on discovered shortcomings of update features, a number of possible solutions were devised. They were presented to key Cypher users, who were given the opportunity to comment on how update features are used in real life, and on their preferences for proposed fixes. As the result of the consultation, a new set of update operations for Cypher were designed. Those led to a streamlined syntax, and eliminated the unexpected and problematic behavior that original Cypher updates exhibited. Alastair Green, Paolo Guagliardo, Leonid Libkin, Tobias Lindaaker, Victor Marsault, Stefan Plantikow, Martin Schuster, Petra Selmer, Hannes Voigt |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 4 |
| 2018 | openCypher: New Directions in Property Graph Querying
Alastair Green, Martin Junghanns, Max Kießling, Tobias Lindaaker, Stefan Plantikow, Petra Selmer |
EDBT | 4 |
| 2018 | G-CORE: A Core for Future Graph Query LanguagesabstractWe report on a community effort between industry and academia to shape the future of graph query languages. We argue that existing graph database management systems should consider supporting a query language with two key characteristics. First, it should be composable, meaning, that graphs are the input and the output of queries. Second, the graph query language should treat paths as first-class citizens. Our result is G-CORE, a powerful graph query language design that fulfills these goals, and strikes a careful balance between path query expressivity and evaluation complexity. Renzo Angles, Marcelo Arenas, Pablo Barceló, Peter Boncz, George Fletcher 0001, Claudio Gutierrez 0001, Tobias Lindaaker, Marcus Paradies, Stefan Plantikow, Juan F. Sequeda, Oskar van Rest, Hannes Voigt |
SIGMOD Conference | 7 |
| 2018 | Cypher: An Evolving Query Language for Property GraphsabstractThe Cypher property graph query language is an evolving language, originally designed and implemented as part of the Neo4j graph database, and it is currently used by several commercial database products and researchers. We describe Cypher 9, which is the first version of the language governed by the openCypher Implementers Group. We first introduce the language by example, and describe its uses in industry. We then provide a formal semantic definition of the core read-query features of Cypher, including its variant of the property graph data model, and its ASCII Art graph pattern matching mechanism for expressing subgraphs of interest to an application. We compare the features of Cypher to other property graph query languages, and describe extensions, at an advanced stage of development, which will form part of Cypher 10, turning the language into a compositional language which supports graph projections and multiple named graphs. Nadime Francis, Alastair Green, Paolo Guagliardo, Leonid Libkin, Tobias Lindaaker, Victor Marsault, Stefan Plantikow, Mats Rydberg, Petra Selmer, Andrés Taylor |
SIGMOD Conference | 5 |