Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anuja Meetoo Appavoo
dblp:211/7146
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › heterogeneous wireless networks
wireless network selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Periodic Bandits and Wireless Network Selection · ICALP 2019 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
adversarial bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Periodic Bandits and Wireless Network Selection · ICALP 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Periodic Bandits and Wireless Network Selection · ICALP 2019 |
Wireless networking
wireless network protocols |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Periodic Bandits and Wireless Network Selection · ICALP 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
periodic regret analysis · 0.8EXP4 · 0.8EXP3 · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Periodic Bandits and Wireless Network SelectionabstractBandit-style algorithms have been studied extensively in stochastic and adversarial settings. Such algorithms have been shown to be useful in multiplayer settings, e.g. to solve the wireless network selection problem, which can be formulated as an adversarial bandit problem. A leading bandit algorithm for the adversarial setting is EXP3. However, network behavior is often repetitive, where user density and network behavior follow regular patterns. Bandit algorithms, like EXP3, fail to provide good guarantees for periodic behaviors. A major reason is that these algorithms compete against fixed-action policies, which is ineffective in a periodic setting. In this paper, we define a periodic bandit setting, and periodic regret as a better performance measure for this type of setting. Instead of comparing an algorithm's performance to fixed-action policies, we aim to be competitive with policies that play arms under some set of possible periodic patterns $F$ (for example, all possible periodic functions with periods $1,2,\cdots,P$). We propose Periodic EXP4, a computationally efficient variant of the EXP4 algorithm for periodic settings. With $K$ arms, $T$ time steps, and where each periodic pattern in $F$ is of length at most $P$, we show that the periodic regret obtained by Periodic EXP4 is at most $O\big(\sqrt{PKT \log K + KT \log |F|}\big)$. We also prove a lower bound of $Ω\big(\sqrt{PKT + KT \frac{\log |F|}{\log K}} \big)$ for the periodic setting, showing that this is optimal within log-factors. As an example, we focus on the wireless network selection problem. Through simulation, we show that Periodic EXP4 learns the periodic pattern over time, adapts to changes in a dynamic environment, and far outperforms EXP3. Shunhao Oh, Anuja Meetoo Appavoo, Seth Gilbert |
ICALP | 2 |
| 2018 | Shrewd Selection Speeds Surfing: Use Smart EXP3!abstractIn this paper, we explore the use of multi-armed bandit online learning techniques to solve distributed resource selection problems. As an example, we focus on the problem of network selection. Mobile devices often have several wireless networks at their disposal. While choosing the right network is vital for good performance, a decentralized solution remains a challenge. The impressive theoretical properties of multi-armed bandit algorithms, like EXP3, suggest that it should work well for this type of problem. Yet, its real-word performance lags far behind. The main reasons are the hidden cost of switching networks and its slow rate of convergence. We propose Smart EXP3, a novel bandit-style algorithm that (a) retains the good theoretical properties of EXP3, (b) bounds the number of switches, and (c) yields significantly better performance in practice. We evaluate Smart EXP3 using simulations, controlled experiments, and in-the-wild experiments. Results show that it stabilizes at the optimal state, achieves fairness among devices and gracefully deals with transient behaviors. In real world experiments, it can achieve 18% faster download over alternate strategies. We conclude that multi-armed bandit algorithms can play an important role in distributed resource selection problems, when practical concerns, such as switching costs and convergence time, are addressed. Anuja Meetoo Appavoo, Seth Gilbert, Kian-Lee Tan |
ICDCS | 1 |