VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Ennemoser
dblp:211/7866
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 84% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers: Combinatorial Optimization and Statistical Physics · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers: Combinatorial Optimization and Statistical Physics · ICLR 2025 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ConfusionFlow: A Model-Agnostic Visualization for Temporal Analysis of Classifier Confusion · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
statistical physics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers: Combinatorial Optimization and Statistical Physics · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | ConfusionFlow: A Model-Agnostic Visualization for Temporal Analysis of Classifier Confusion · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-normalized neural importance sampling · 2.6policy gradient · 2.6neural markov chain monte carlo · 2.6case study · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers: Combinatorial Optimization and Statistical PhysicsabstractLearning to sample from complex unnormalized distributions over discrete domains emerged as a promising research direction with applications in statistical physics, variational inference, and combinatorial optimization. Recent work has demonstrated the potential of diffusion models in this domain. However, existing methods face limitations in memory scaling and thus the number of attainable diffusion steps since they require backpropagation through the entire generative process. To overcome these limitations we introduce two novel training methods for discrete diffusion samplers, one grounded in the policy gradient theorem and the other one leveraging Self-Normalized Neural Importance Sampling (SN-NIS). These methods yield memory-efficient training and achieve state-of-the-art results in unsupervised combinatorial optimization.
Numerous scientific applications additionally require the ability of unbiased sampling. We introduce adaptations of SN-NIS and Neural Markov Chain Monte Carlo that enable for the first time the application of discrete diffusion models to this problem. We validate our methods on Ising model benchmarks and find that they outperform popular autoregressive approaches. Our work opens new avenues for applying diffusion models to a wide range of scientific applications in discrete domains that were hitherto restricted to exact likelihood models. Sebastian Sanokowski, Wilhelm Berghammer, Haoyu Peter Wang, Martin Ennemoser, Sepp Hochreiter, Sebastian Lehner |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | ConfusionFlow: A Model-Agnostic Visualization for Temporal Analysis of Classifier ConfusionabstractClassifiers are among the most widely used supervised machine learning algorithms. Many classification models exist, and choosing the right one for a given task is difficult. During model selection and debugging, data scientists need to assess classifiers' performances, evaluate their learning behavior over time, and compare different models. Typically, this analysis is based on single-number performance measures such as accuracy. A more detailed evaluation of classifiers is possible by inspecting class errors. The confusion matrix is an established way for visualizing these class errors, but it was not designed with temporal or comparative analysis in mind. More generally, established performance analysis systems do not allow a combined temporal and comparative analysis of class-level information. To address this issue, we propose ConfusionFlow, an interactive, comparative visualization tool that combines the benefits of class confusion matrices with the visualization of performance characteristics over time. ConfusionFlow is model-agnostic and can be used to compare performances for different model types, model architectures, and/or training and test datasets. We demonstrate the usefulness of ConfusionFlow in a case study on instance selection strategies in active learning. We further assess the scalability of ConfusionFlow and present a use case in the context of neural network pruning. Andreas P. Hinterreiter, Peter Ruch, Holger Stitz, Martin Ennemoser, Jürgen Bernard, Hendrik Strobelt, Marc Streit |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 4 |