Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sergei Solonets

dblp:211/9945 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 67% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
direct image alignment
0.812024
An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function
0.812024
An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.812024
An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised feature embeddings · 0.8gauss-newton loss · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Global Focal and Radial Distortion Averaging from Radial Fundamental Matrices for Robust Self-Calibration
abstract
Classical self-calibration techniques either perform computationally expensive bundle adjustment to estimate all camera parameters or initialize the focal lengths alone by globally averaging fundamental matrices, typically ignoring radial distortion. Both strategies can degrade accuracy in large-scale Structure from Motion pipelines. We present a calibration method that overcomes these limitations by averaging focal lengths and radial distortion parameters using radial fundamental matrices. This method avoids costly point-wise optimization. Our algorithm minimizes the geometric distance between an observed fundamental matrix and the essential-matrix manifold. This provides a mathematically consistent and highly scalable framework for calibrating the camera’s intrinsic parameters. Experiments on diverse real-world datasets demonstrate that our joint estimator provides more precise focal length and distortion parameter estimates than existing methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate that naive, independent distortion averaging is suboptimal, which reinforces the importance of joint focal-radial estimation. These results underscore the importance of incorporating radial distortion averaging into modern self-calibration methods to improve reconstruction accuracy and stability.
Sergei Solonets, Daniil Sinitsyn, Daniel Cremers
WACV1
2024 An Analytical Solution to Gauss-Newton Loss for Direct Image Alignment
abstract
Direct image alignment is a widely used technique for relative 6DoF pose estimation between two images, but its accuracy strongly depends on pose initialization. Therefore, recent end-to-end frameworks increase the convergence basin of the learned feature descriptors with special training objectives, such as the Gauss-Newton loss. However, the training data may exhibit bias toward a specific type of motion and pose initialization, thus limiting the generalization of these methods. In this work, we derive a closed-form solution to the expected optimum of the Gauss-Newton loss. The solution is agnostic to the underlying feature representation and allows us to dynamically adjust the basin of convergence according to our assumptions about the uncertainty in the current estimates. These properties allow for effective control over the convergence in the alignment process. Despite using self-supervised feature embeddings, our solution achieves compelling accuracy w.r.t. the state-of-the-art direct image alignment methods trained end-to-end with pose supervision, and demonstrates improved robustness to pose initialization. Our analytical solution exposes some inherent limitations of end-to-end learning with the Gauss-Newton loss, and establishes an intriguing connection between direct image alignment and feature-matching approaches.
Sergei Solonets, Daniil Sinitsyn, Lukas von Stumberg, Nikita Araslanov, Daniel Cremers
ICLR1