VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sophia Sanborn
dblp:212/5137
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › feature transformation
fourier features |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Harmonics of Learning: Universal Fourier Features Emerge in Invariant Networks · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group equivariant neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › symmetry learning
symmetry discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Harmonics of Learning: Universal Fourier Features Emerge in Invariant Networks · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A General Framework for Robust G-Invariance in G-Equivariant Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A General Framework for Robust G-Invariance in G-Equivariant Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › equivariance
equivariant representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bispectral Neural Networks · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group equivariant CNN |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A General Framework for Robust G-Invariance in G-Equivariant Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
group theory · 1.4signal processing · 0.8group representation theory · 0.8fourier analysis · 0.8triple-correlation theory · 0.7group equivariance · 0.7bispectral invariants · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Harmonics of Learning: Universal Fourier Features Emerge in Invariant NetworksabstractIn this work, we formally prove that, under certain conditions, if a neural network is invariant to a finite group then its weights recover the Fourier transform on that group. This provides a mathematical explanation for the emergence of Fourier features – a ubiquitous phenomenon in both biological and artificial learning systems. The results hold even for non-commutative groups, in which case the Fourier transform encodes all the irreducible unitary group representations. Our findings have consequences for the problem of symmetry discovery. Specifically, we demonstrate that the algebraic structure of an unknown group can be recovered from the weights of a network that is at least approximately invariant within certain bounds. Overall, this work contributes to a foundation for an algebraic learning theory of invariant neural network representations. Giovanni Luca Marchetti, Christopher Hillar, Danica Kragic, Sophia Sanborn |
COLT | 4 |
| 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant NetworksabstractAn important problem in signal processing and deep learning is to achieve *invariance* to nuisance factors not relevant for the task. Since many of these factors are describable as the action of a group $G$ (e.g. rotations, translations, scalings), we want methods to be $G$-invariant. The $G$-Bispectrum extracts every characteristic of a given signal up to group action: for example, the shape of an object in an image, but not its orientation. Consequently, the $G$-Bispectrum has been incorporated into deep neural network architectures as a computational primitive for $G$-invariance\textemdash akin to a pooling mechanism, but with greater selectivity and robustness. However, the computational cost of the $G$-Bispectrum ($\mathcal{O}(|G|^2)$, with $|G|$ the size of the group) has limited its widespread adoption. Here, we show that the $G$-Bispectrum computation contains redundancies that can be reduced into a *selective $G$-Bispectrum* with $\mathcal{O}(|G|)$ complexity. We prove desirable mathematical properties of the selective $G$-Bispectrum and demonstrate how its integration in neural networks enhances accuracy and robustness compared to traditional approaches, while enjoying considerable speeds-up compared to the full $G$-Bispectrum. Simon Mataigne, Johan Mathe, Sophia Sanborn, Christopher Hillar, Nina Miolane |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Bispectral Neural Networks
Sophia Sanborn, Christian Shewmake, Bruno A. Olshausen, Christopher Hillar |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | A General Framework for Robust G-Invariance in G-Equivariant NetworksabstractWe introduce a general method for achieving robust group-invariance in group-equivariant convolutional neural networks ($G$-CNNs), which we call the $G$-triple-correlation ($G$-TC) layer. The approach leverages the theory of the triple-correlation on groups, which is the unique, lowest-degree polynomial invariant map that is also \textit{complete}. Many commonly used invariant maps\textemdash such as the \texttt{max}\textemdash are incomplete: they remove both group and signal structure. A complete invariant, by contrast, removes only the variation due to the actions of the group, while preserving all information about the structure of the signal. The completeness of the triple correlation endows the $G$-TC layer with strong robustness, which can be observed in its resistance to invariance-based adversarial attacks. In addition, we observe that it yields measurable improvements in classification accuracy over standard Max $G$-Pooling in $G$-CNN architectures. We provide a general and efficient implementation of the method for any discretized group, which requires only a table defining the group's product structure. We demonstrate the benefits of this method for $G$-CNNs defined on both commutative and non-commutative groups\textemdash $SO(2)$, $O(2)$, $SO(3)$, and $O(3)$ (discretized as the cyclic $C8$, dihedral $D16$, chiral octahedral $O$ and full octahedral $O_h$ groups)\textemdash acting on $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$ on both $G$-MNIST and $G$-ModelNet10 datasets. Sophia Sanborn, Nina Miolane |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Representational efficiency outweighs action efficiency in human program induction
Sophia Sanborn, David Bourgin, Michael Chang 0003, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2016 | Representations of Entropy and of the Relations Same and Different Early in Human Development
Rebecca Zhu, Jean-Rémy Hochmann, Sophia Sanborn, Susan Carey |
CogSci | 3 |