As technology advances, user demand for immersive and authentic information presentation rises. Traditional 2D displays and interactions fail to meet modern standards, while virtual reality (VR) is gaining attention for its immersive experience. However, using a controller for VR movement can cause dizziness due to mismatched visual and vestibular cues, impacting the VR experience. This paper analyzes the main causes of VR-induced vertigo and develops improved handheld controller movement strategies. These strategies adjust the user’s pitch angle and field of view in real time or map the user’s real-world head acceleration to the virtual character. By intelligently adjusting the controller-to-VR display mapping, these methods reduce vertigo. In addition, this paper also verified the actual effects of these designs through a series of experiments, and conducted detailed data analysis on the degree of user vertigo. The experimental results showed that using a specific improved handheld controller movement design can significantly improve the user’s comfort in the VR environment, effectively reducing the occurrence of vertigo and discomfort.

Software development is a repetitive task, as developers usually reuse or get inspiration from existing implementations. Code search, which refers to the retrieval of relevant code snippets from a codebase according to the developer’s intent that has been expressed as a query, has become increasingly important in the software development process. Due to the success of deep learning in various applications, a great number of deep learning-based code search approaches have sprung up and achieved promising results. However, developers may not follow the same naming conventions and the same variable may have different variable names in different implementations, bringing a challenge to deep learning-based code search methods that rely on explicit variable correspondences to understand source code. To overcome this challenge, we propose a Naming-Agnostic Code Search (NACS) method based on contrastive multi-view code representation learning. NACS strips information bound to variable names from Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), the representation of the abstract syntactic structure of source code, and focuses on capturing intrinsic properties solely from AST structures. We use semantic-level and syntax-level augmentation techniques to prepare realistically rational data and adopt contrastive learning to design a graph-view modeling component in NACS to enhance the understanding of code snippets. We further model ASTs in a path view to strengthen the graph-view modeling component through multi-view learning. Extensive experiments show that NACS provides superior code search performance compared to baselines and NACS can be adapted to help existing code search methods overcome the impact of different naming conventions. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/KDEGroup/NACS .

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable capabilities in code generation. Despite significant achievements, they rely on enormous training data to acquire a broad spectrum of open-domain knowledge. Besides, their evaluation revolves around open-domain benchmarks like HumanEval, which primarily consist of programming contests. Therefore, it is hard to fully characterize the intricacies and challenges associated with particular domains (e.g., Web, game, and math). In this article, we conduct an in-depth study of the LLMs in domain-specific code generation. Our results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit sub-optimal performance in generating domain-specific code, due to their limited proficiency in utilizing domain-specific libraries. We further observe that incorporating API knowledge as prompts can empower LLMs to generate more professional code. Based on these findings, we further investigate how to effectively incorporate API knowledge into the code generation process. We experiment with three strategies for incorporating domain knowledge, namely, external knowledge inquirer, chain-of-thought prompting, and chain-of-thought fine-tuning. We refer to these strategies as a new code generation approach called DomCoder . Experimental results show that all strategies of DomCoder improve the effectiveness of domain-specific code generation under certain settings.

As code review is a tedious and costly software quality practice, researchers have proposed several machine learning-based methods to automate the process. The primary focus has been on accuracy, that is, how accurately the algorithms are able to detect issues in the code under review. However, human intervention still remains inevitable since results produced by automated code review are not 100% correct. To assist human reviewers in making their final decisions on automatically generated review comments, the comprehensibility of the comments underpinned by accurate localization and relevant explanations for the detected issues with repair suggestions is paramount. However, this has largely been neglected in the existing research. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to generate code review comments that are more readable and comprehensible by humans, thanks to their remarkable processing and reasoning capabilities. However, even mainstream LLMs perform poorly in detecting the presence of code issues because they have not been specifically trained for this binary classification task required in code review. In this article, we contribute Comprehensibility of Automated Code Review using Large Language Models ( Carllm ), a novel fine-tuned LLM that has the ability to improve not only the accuracy but, more importantly, the comprehensibility of automated code review, as compared to state-of-the-art pre-trained models and general LLMs.

Code review is an important practice in software development. One of its main objectives is for the assurance of code quality. For this purpose, the efficacy of code review is subject to the credibility of reviewers, i.e., reviewers who have demonstrated strong evidence of previously making quality-enhancing comments are more credible than those who have not. Code reviewer recommendation (CRR) is designed to assist in recommending suitable reviewers for a specific objective and, in this context, assurance of code quality. Its performance is susceptible to the relevance of its training dataset to this objective, composed of all reviewers’ historical review comments, which, however, often contains a plethora of comments that are irrelevant to the enhancement of code quality. Furthermore, recommendation accuracy has been adopted as the sole metric to evaluate a recommender's performance, which is inadequate as it does not take reviewers’ relevant credibility into consideration. These two issues form the ground truth problem in CRR as they both originate from the relevance of dataset used to train and evaluate CRR algorithms. To tackle this problem, we first propose the concept of Quality-Enhancing Review Comments (QERC), which includes three types of comments - change-triggering inline comments, informative general comments, and approve-to-merge comments. We then devise a set of algorithms and procedures to obtain a distilled dataset by applyingQERCto the original dataset. We finally introduce a new metric – reviewer's credibility for quality enhancement (RCQE) – as a complementary metric to recommendation accuracy for evaluating the performance of recommenders. To validate the proposed QERC-based approach to CRR, we conduct empirical studies using real data from seven projects containing over 82K pull requests and 346K review comments. Results show that: (a)QERCcan effectively address the ground truth problem by distilling quality-enhancing comments from the dataset containing original code reviews, (b)QERCcan assist recommenders in finding highly credible reviewers at a slight cost of recommendation accuracy, and (c) even “wrong” recommendations using the distilled dataset are likely to be more credible than those using the original dataset.

Refactoring is an indispensable practice of improving the quality and maintainability of source code in software evolution. Rename refactoring is the most frequently performed refactoring that suggests a new name for an identifier to enhance readability when the identifier is poorly named. However, most existing works only identify renaming activities between two versions of source code, while few works express concern about how to suggest a new name. In this paper, we study automatic rename refactoring on variable names, which is considered more challenging than other rename refactoring activities. We first point out the connections between rename refactoring and various prevalent learning paradigms and the difference between rename refactoring and general text generation in natural language processing. Based on our observations, we propose RefBERT, a two-stage pre-trained framework for rename refactoring on variable names. RefBERT first predicts the number of sub-tokens in the new name and then generates sub-tokens accordingly. Several techniques, including constrained masked language modeling, contrastive learning, and the bag-of-tokens loss, are incorporated into RefBERT to tailor it for automatic rename refactoring on variable names. Through extensive experiments on our constructed refactoring datasets, we show that the generated variable names of RefBERT are more accurate and meaningful than those produced by the existing method. Our implementation and data are available at https://github.com/KDEGroup/RefBERT.

Issue-commit links, as a type of software traceability links, play a vital role in various software development and maintenance tasks. However, they are typically deficient, as developers often forget or fail to create tags when making commits. Existing studies have deployed deep learning techniques, including pretrained models, to improve automatic issue-commit link recovery. Despite their promising performance, we argue that previous approaches have four main problems, hindering them from recovering links in large software projects. To overcome these problems, we propose an efficient and accurate pre-trained framework called EALink for issue-commit link recovery. EALink requires much fewer model parameters than existing pre-trained methods, bringing efficient training and recovery. Moreover, we design various techniques to improve the recovery accuracy of EALink. We construct a large-scale dataset and conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the power of EALink. Results show that EALink outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin (15.23%-408.65%) on various evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, its training and inference overhead is orders of magnitude lower than existing methods. We provide our implementation and data at https://github.com/KDEGroup/EALink.