Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bhavana Ganesh

dblp:212/9541 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 94% Efficient and distributed learning · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of LLMs using Implicit Reward Margins · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of LLMs using Implicit Reward Margins · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
preference data selection
0.912025
SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of LLMs using Implicit Reward Margins · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
speculative sampling
0.912025
Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
test-time scaling
0.912025
Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.312025
Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

speculative sampling · 0.9preference bootstrapping · 0.9model-free sampling · 0.9implicit reward margin · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Accelerated Test-Time Scaling with Model-Free Speculative Sampling
abstract
Woomin Song, Saket Dingliwal, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Bhavana Ganesh, Jinwoo Shin, Aram Galstyan, Sravan Babu Bodapati. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Woomin Song, Saket Dingliwal, Sai Muralidhar Jayanthi, Bhavana Ganesh, Jinwoo Shin, Aram Galstyan, Sravan Babu Bodapati
EMNLP4
2025 SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of LLMs using Implicit Reward Margins
abstract
Direct alignment algorithms (DAAs), such as direct preference optimization (DPO), have become popular alternatives to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) due to their simplicity, efficiency, and stability. However, the preferences used by DAAs are usually collected before alignment training begins and remain unchanged (off-policy). This design leads to two problems where the policy model (1) picks up on spurious correlations in the dataset (as opposed to only learning alignment to human preferences), and (2) overfits to feedback on off-policy trajectories that have less likelihood of being generated by the updated policy model. To address these issues, we introduce Self-Reviewing and Alignment (SeRA), a cost-efficient and effective method that can be readily combined with existing DAAs. SeRA comprises of two components: (1) sample selection using implicit reward margin to alleviate over-optimization on such undesired features, and (2) preference bootstrapping using implicit rewards to augment preference data with updated policy models in a cost-efficient manner. Extensive experiments, including on instruction-following tasks, demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of SeRA in training LLMs with diverse offline preference datasets and and DAAs.
Jongwoo Ko, Saket Dingliwal, Bhavana Ganesh, Sailik Sengupta, Sravan Babu Bodapati, Aram Galstyan
ICLR3