Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yesom Park
dblp:213/0699
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 42% 3D vision · 37% Optimization for machine learning · 21% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Image and video processing · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence guarantees
gradient descent convergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
denoising diffusion |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Restoration based Generative Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Restoration based Generative Models · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
implicit neural representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point clouds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation › implicit surface representation
signed distance function |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point clouds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Restoration based Generative Models · ICML 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
point cloud reconstruction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point clouds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point clouds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
inverse problem solving |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Restoration based Generative Models · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
partial differential equations |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point clouds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
p-poisson equation · 2.0implicit neural representation · 2.0curl-free constraint · 2.0variable splitting · 1.5gradient flow analysis · 1.5multi-scale training · 1.3MAP-based estimation · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | How does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs?abstractThis paper analyzes the inverse relationship between the order of partial differential equations (PDEs) and the convergence of gradient descent in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) with the power of ReLU activation. The integration of the PDE into a loss function endows PINNs with a distinctive feature to require computing derivatives of model up to the PDE order. Although it has been empirically observed that PINNs encounter difficulties in convergence when dealing with high-order or high-dimensional PDEs, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of this issue remains elusive. This paper offers theoretical support for this pathological behavior by demonstrating that the gradient flow converges in a lower probability when the PDE order is higher. In addition, we show that PINNs struggle to address high-dimensional problems because the influence of dimensionality on convergence is exacerbated with increasing PDE order. To address the pathology, we use the insights garnered to consider variable splitting that decomposes the high-order PDE into a system of lower-order PDEs. We prove that by reducing the differential order, the gradient flow of variable splitting is more likely to converge to the global optimum. Furthermore, we present numerical experiments in support of our theoretical claims. Changhoon Song, Yesom Park, Myungjoo Kang |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Restoration based Generative ModelsabstractDenoising diffusion models (DDMs) have recently attracted increasing attention by showing impressive synthesis quality. DDMs are built on a diffusion process that pushes data to the noise distribution and the models learn to denoise. In this paper, we establish the interpretation of DDMs in terms of image restoration (IR). Integrating IR literature allows us to use an alternative objective and diverse forward processes, not confining to the diffusion process. By imposing prior knowledge on the loss function grounded on MAP-based estimation, we eliminate the need for the expensive sampling of DDMs. Also, we propose a multi-scale training, which improves the performance compared to the diffusion process, by taking advantage of the flexibility of the forward process. Experimental results demonstrate that our model improves the quality and efficiency of both training and inference. Furthermore, we show the applicability of our model to inverse problems. We believe that our framework paves the way for designing a new type of flexible general generative model. Jaemoo Choi, Yesom Park, Myungjoo Kang |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | p-Poisson surface reconstruction in curl-free flow from point cloudsabstractThe aim of this paper is the reconstruction of a smooth surface from an unorganized point cloud sampled by a closed surface, with the preservation of geometric shapes, without any further information other than the point cloud. Implicit neural representations (INRs) have recently emerged as a promising approach to surface reconstruction. However, the reconstruction quality of existing methods relies on ground truth implicit function values or surface normal vectors. In this paper, we show that proper supervision of partial differential equations and fundamental properties of differential vector fields are sufficient to robustly reconstruct high-quality surfaces. We cast the $p$-Poisson equation to learn a signed distance function (SDF) and the reconstructed surface is implicitly represented by the zero-level set of the SDF. For efficient training, we develop a variable splitting structure by introducing a gradient of the SDF as an auxiliary variable and impose the $p$-Poisson equation directly on the auxiliary variable as a hard constraint. Based on the curl-free property of the gradient field, we impose a curl-free constraint on the auxiliary variable, which leads to a more faithful reconstruction. Experiments on standard benchmark datasets show that the proposed INR provides a superior and robust reconstruction. The code is available at https://github.com/Yebbi/PINC. Yesom Park, Taekyung Lee, Jooyoung Hahn, Myungjoo Kang |
NeurIPS | 1 |