Will Wei Sun

dblp:213/2696 · also Wei Sun 0027 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8412-6430ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 48% Approximation and online algorithms · 20% Algorithms and data structures · 14%
Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% Learning theory · 19% Reinforcement learning · 10%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Computational finance and economics · 33% Computational social science and digital humanities · 33% Medical and health informatics · 33%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 34, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
1.042020
Tensor Graphical Model: Non-Convex Optimization and Statistical Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Simultaneous Clustering and Estimation of Heterogeneous Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Non-convex Statistical Optimization for Sparse Tensor Graphical Model · NIPS 2015
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
active learning
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Approximation and online algorithms
online allocation
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online matching
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
stable matching
0.812024
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations · EC 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.612022
Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Unknown Noise: Explore-then-UCB Strategy and Improved Regrets · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.612022
Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Unknown Noise: Explore-then-UCB Strategy and Improved Regrets · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › dynamic pricing
contextual dynamic pricing
0.612022
Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Unknown Noise: Explore-then-UCB Strategy and Improved Regrets · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
dynamic pricing
0.612022
Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Unknown Noise: Explore-then-UCB Strategy and Improved Regrets · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
additive models
0.512021
Sparse Tensor Additive Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.512021
Sparse Tensor Additive Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › gaussian graphical model
precision matrix estimation
0.412020
Tensor Graphical Model: Non-Convex Optimization and Statistical Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.412020
Tensor Graphical Model: Non-Convex Optimization and Statistical Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020
Data mining
clustering
0.412020
Provable Convex Co-clustering of Tensors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Data mining › clustering › co-clustering
tensor co-clustering
0.412020
Provable Convex Co-clustering of Tensors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.412020
Provable Convex Co-clustering of Tensors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Computational complexity › property testing
graph property testing
0.312018
Sketching Method for Large Scale Combinatorial Inference · NeurIPS 2018
Algorithms and data structures
sketching
0.312018
Sketching Method for Large Scale Combinatorial Inference · NeurIPS 2018
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.322017
Non-convex Statistical Optimization for Sparse Tensor Graphical Model · NIPS 2015
STORE: Sparse Tensor Response Regression and Neuroimaging Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering
0.312017
Simultaneous Clustering and Estimation of Heterogeneous Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
model-based clustering
0.312017
Simultaneous Clustering and Estimation of Heterogeneous Graphical Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.312017
STORE: Sparse Tensor Response Regression and Neuroimaging Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.212015
Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › graphical model estimation
sparse graphical models
0.212015
Non-convex Statistical Optimization for Sparse Tensor Graphical Model · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation
0.212015
Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising · AAAI 2015
Computational social science and digital humanities › marketing
advertising effectiveness measurement
0.212015
Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising · AAAI 2015
Computational finance and economics
online advertising
0.212015
Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising · AAAI 2015
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
alternating minimization
0.212015
Non-convex Statistical Optimization for Sparse Tensor Graphical Model · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

alternating minimization · 1.2nonparametric estimation · 1.1explore-then-UCB · 1.1non-asymptotic error bound · 0.9false discovery rate control · 0.9de-biased inference · 0.9convex formulation · 0.9online allocation · 0.8active learning · 0.8neighborhood regression · 0.7adjacency matrix sketching · 0.7low-rank regularization · 0.6alternating updating · 0.6penalized alternating minimization · 0.5non-convex optimization · 0.5sparse tensor decomposition · 0.3penalized likelihood · 0.3sparse additive model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations
abstract
Ensuring fair and stable allocation of scarce resources is a fundamental challenge in a wide range of applications. Examples of domains where these challenges manifest include applications where geographical and time constraints impede information collection, such as distributing resources to food banks and providing humanitarian aid to disaster areas and war zones [Aleksandrov et al., 2015, Aleksandrov and Walsh, 2020]. Even in online marketplaces devoid of physical constraints, such as dating services and job matching, evaluating information and collecting data presents a formidable challenge. Recent literature bridges this gap partially by learning noisy preferences as allocation decisions are made. This approach makes allocation processes more adaptable and efficient when the information is incomplete or dynamically changing. However, the current research typically assumes that input from all participants is available at each time-epoch of the allocation process [Bistritz et al., 2020, Cen and Shah, 2022, Leshem, 2024, Liu et al., 2020, Yamada et al., 2023]. Since gathering information is costly and often practical considerations make it infeasible, assuming its availability overlooks the possibility of designing efficient algorithms that operate with limited feedback and the accompanying analysis fails to illuminate which feedback is crucial for efficient design.
Riddhiman Bhattacharya, Thành Nguyen 0001, Will Wei Sun, Mohit Tawarmalani
EC3
2024 Evaluating multimedia advertising campaign effectiveness
Pengyuan Wang 0001, Guiyang Xiong, Will Wei Sun, Jian Yang 0002
Decis. Support Syst.3
2022 Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Unknown Noise: Explore-then-UCB Strategy and Improved Regrets
abstract
Dynamic pricing is a fast-moving research area in machine learning and operations management. A lot of work has been done for this problem with known noise. In this paper, we consider a contextual dynamic pricing problem under a linear customer valuation model with an unknown market noise distribution $F$. This problem is very challenging due to the difficulty in balancing three tangled tasks of revenue-maximization, estimating the linear valuation parameter $\theta_{0}$, and learning the nonparametric $F$. To address this issue, we develop a novel {\it Explore-then-UCB} (ExUCB) strategy that includes an exploration for $\theta_{0}$-learning and a followed UCB procedure of joint revenue-maximization and $F$-learning. Under Lipschitz and 2nd-order smoothness assumptions on $F$, ExUCB is the first approach to achieve the $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret rate. Under the Lipschitz assumption only, ExUCB matches the best existing regret of $\tilde{O}(T^{3/4})$ and is computationally more efficient. Furthermore, for regret lower bounds under the nonparametric $F$, not much work has been done beyond only assuming Lipschitz. To fill this gap, we provide the first $\tilde{\Omega}(T^{3/5})$ lower bound under Lipschitz and 2nd-order smoothness assumptions.
Yiyun Luo, Will Wei Sun
NeurIPS2
2021 Sparse Tensor Additive Regression
abstract
Tensors are becoming prevalent in modern applications such as medical imaging and digital marketing. In this paper, we propose a sparse tensor additive regression (STAR) that models a scalar response as a flexible nonparametric function of tensor covariates. The proposed model effectively exploits the sparse and low-rank structures in the tensor additive regression. We formulate the parameter estimation as a non-convex optimization problem, and propose an efficient penalized alternating minimization algorithm. We establish a non-asymptotic error bound for the estimator obtained from each iteration of the proposed algorithm, which reveals an interplay between the optimization error and the statistical rate of convergence. We demonstrate the efficacy of STAR through extensive comparative simulation studies, and an application to the click-through-rate prediction in online advertising.
Botao Hao, Pengyuan Wang 0001, Jingfei Zhang, Jian Yang 0002, Will Wei Sun
J. Mach. Learn. Res.6
2020 Provable Convex Co-clustering of Tensors
abstract
Cluster analysis is a fundamental tool for pattern discovery of complex heterogeneous data. Prevalent clustering methods mainly focus on vector or matrix-variate data and are not applicable to general-order tensors, which arise frequently in modern scientific and business applications. Moreover, there is a gap between statistical guarantees and computational efficiency for existing tensor clustering solutions due to the nature of their non-convex formulations. In this work, we bridge this gap by developing a provable convex formulation of tensor co-clustering. Our convex co-clustering (CoCo) estimator enjoys stability guarantees and its computational and storage costs are polynomial in the size of the data. We further establish a non-asymptotic error bound for the CoCo estimator, which reveals a surprising “blessing of dimensionality” phenomenon that does not exist in vector or matrix-variate cluster analysis. Our theoretical findings are supported by extensive simulated studies. Finally, we apply the CoCo estimator to the cluster analysis of advertisement click tensor data from a major online company. Our clustering results provide meaningful business insights to improve advertising effectiveness.
Eric C. Chi, Brian J. Gaines, Will Wei Sun, Hua Zhou 0001, Jian Yang 0002
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2020 Tensor Graphical Model: Non-Convex Optimization and Statistical Inference
abstract
We consider the estimation and inference of graphical models that characterize the dependency structure of high-dimensional tensor-valued data. To facilitate the estimation of the precision matrix corresponding to each way of the tensor, we assume the data follow a tensor normal distribution whose covariance has a Kronecker product structure. A critical challenge in the estimation and inference of this model is the fact that its penalized maximum likelihood estimation involves minimizing a non-convex objective function. To address it, this paper makes two contributions: (i) In spite of the non-convexity of this estimation problem, we prove that an alternating minimization algorithm, which iteratively estimates each sparse precision matrix while fixing the others, attains an estimator with an optimal statistical rate of convergence. (ii) We propose a de-biased statistical inference procedure for testing hypotheses on the true support of the sparse precision matrices, and employ it for testing a growing number of hypothesis with false discovery rate (FDR) control. The asymptotic normality of our test statistic and the consistency of FDR control procedure are established. Our theoretical results are backed up by thorough numerical studies and our real applications on neuroimaging studies of Autism spectrum disorder and users' advertising click analysis bring new scientific findings and business insights. The proposed methods are encoded into a publicly available R package Tlasso.
Will Wei Sun, Zhaoran Wang 0001, Han Liu 0001, Jian Yang 0002, Guang Cheng 0003
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2018 Sketching Method for Large Scale Combinatorial Inference
abstract
We present computationally efficient algorithms to test various combinatorial structures of large-scale graphical models. In order to test the hypotheses on their topological structures, we propose two adjacency matrix sketching frameworks: neighborhood sketching and subgraph sketching. The neighborhood sketching algorithm is proposed to test the connectivity of graphical models. This algorithm randomly subsamples vertices and conducts neighborhood regression and screening. The global sketching algorithm is proposed to test the topological properties requiring exponential computation complexity, especially testing the chromatic number and the maximum clique. This algorithm infers the corresponding property based on the sampled subgraph. Our algorithms are shown to substantially accelerate the computation of existing methods. We validate our theory and method through both synthetic simulations and a real application in neuroscience.
Will Wei Sun, Han Liu 0001
NeurIPS1
2017 Simultaneous Clustering and Estimation of Heterogeneous Graphical Models
Botao Hao, Will Wei Sun, Guang Cheng 0003
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2017 STORE: Sparse Tensor Response Regression and Neuroimaging Analysis
abstract
Motivated by applications in neuroimaging analysis, we propose a new regression model, Sparse TensOr REsponse regression (STORE), with a tensor response and a vector predictor. STORE embeds two key sparse structures: element-wise sparsity and low-rankness. It can handle both a non-symmetric and a symmetric tensor response, and thus is applicable to both structural and functional neuroimaging data. We formulate the parameter estimation as a non-convex optimization problem, and develop an efficient alternating updating algorithm. We establish a non- asymptotic estimation error bound for the actual estimator obtained from the proposed algorithm. This error bound reveals an interesting interaction between the computational efficiency and the statistical rate of convergence. When the distribution of the error tensor is Gaussian, we further obtain a fast estimation error rate which allows the tensor dimension to grow exponentially with the sample size. We illustrate the efficacy of our model through intensive simulations and an analysis of the Autism spectrum disorder neuroimaging data.
Will Wei Sun, Lexin Li
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2015 Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising
abstract
Advertising effectiveness measurement is a fundamental problem in online advertising. Various causal inference methods have been employed to measure the causal effects of ad treatments. However, existing methods mainly focus on linear logistic regression for univariate and binary treatments and are not well suited for complex ad treatments of multi-dimensions, where each dimension could be discrete or continuous. In this paper we propose a novel two-stage causal inference framework for assessing the impact of complex ad treatments. In the first stage, we estimate the propensity parameter via a sparse additive model; in the second stage, a propensity-adjusted regression model is applied for measuring the treatment effect. Our approach is shown to provide an unbiased estimation of the ad effectiveness under regularity conditions. To demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, we apply it to a real online advertising campaign to evaluate the impact of three ad treatments: ad frequency, ad channel, and ad size. We show that the ad frequency usually has a treatment effect cap when ads are showing on mobile device. In addition, the strategies for choosing best ad size are completely different for mobile ads and online ads.
Will Wei Sun, Pengyuan Wang 0001, Dawei Yin 0001, Jian Yang 0002, Yi Chang 0001
AAAI1
2015 Non-convex Statistical Optimization for Sparse Tensor Graphical Model
abstract
We consider the estimation of sparse graphical models that characterize the dependency structure of high-dimensional tensor-valued data. To facilitate the estimation of the precision matrix corresponding to each way of the tensor, we assume the data follow a tensor normal distribution whose covariance has a Kronecker product structure. The penalized maximum likelihood estimation of this model involves minimizing a non-convex objective function. In spite of the non-convexity of this estimation problem, we prove that an alternating minimization algorithm, which iteratively estimates each sparse precision matrix while fixing the others, attains an estimator with the optimal statistical rate of convergence as well as consistent graph recovery. Notably, such an estimator achieves estimation consistency with only one tensor sample, which is unobserved in previous work. Our theoretical results are backed by thorough numerical studies.
Will Wei Sun, Zhaoran Wang 0001, Han Liu 0001, Guang Cheng 0003
NIPS1
2015 Robust Tree-based Causal Inference for Complex Ad Effectiveness Analysis
abstract
As the online advertising industry has evolved into an age of diverse ad formats and delivery channels, users are exposed to complex ad treatments involving various ad characteristics. The diversity and generality of ad treatments call for accurate and causal measurement of ad effectiveness, i.e., how the ad treatment causes the changes in outcomes without the confounding effect by user characteristics. Various causal inference approaches have been proposed to measure the causal effect of ad treatments. However, most existing causal inference methods focus on univariate and binary treatment and are not well suited for complex ad treatments. Moreover, to be practical in the data-rich online environment, the measurement needs to be highly general and efficient, which is not addressed in conventional causal inference approaches. In this paper we propose a novel causal inference framework for assessing the impact of general advertising treatments. Our new framework enables analysis on uni- or multi-dimensional ad treatments, where each dimension (ad treatment factor) could be discrete or continuous. We prove that our approach is able to provide an unbiased estimation of the ad effectiveness by controlling the confounding effect of user characteristics. The framework is computationally efficient by employing a tree structure that specifies the relationship between user characteristics and the corresponding ad treatment. This tree-based framework is robust to model misspecification and highly flexible with minimal manual tuning. To demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, we apply it to two advertising campaigns. In the first campaign we evaluate the impact of different ad frequencies, and in the second one we consider the synthetic ad effectiveness across TV and online platforms. Our framework successfully provides the causal impact of ads with different frequencies in both campaigns. Moreover, it shows that the ad frequency usually has a treatment effect cap, which is usually over-estimated by naive estimation.
Pengyuan Wang 0001, Will Wei Sun, Dawei Yin 0001, Jian Yang 0002, Yi Chang 0001
WSDM2