Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Nebgen
dblp:213/7870 · also Benjamin T. Nebgen
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5310-3263ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Topological Signatures of Adversaries in Multimodal Alignments · ICML 2025 LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial Purification · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial example detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Topological Signatures of Adversaries in Multimodal Alignments · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › test-time defense
adversarial purification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial Purification · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion-based purification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial Purification · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial Purification · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tucker decomposition · 0.9topological-contrastive loss · 0.9persistent homology · 0.9maximum mean discrepancy · 0.9low-rank approximation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LoRID: Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion for Adversarial PurificationabstractThis work presents an information-theoretic examination of diffusion-based purification methods, the state-of-the-art adversarial defenses that utilize diffusion models to remove malicious perturbations in adversarial examples. By theoretically characterizing the inherent purification errors associated with the Markov-based diffusion purifications, we introduce LoRID, a novel Low-Rank Iterative Diffusion purification method designed to remove adversarial perturbation with low intrinsic purification errors. LoRID centers around a multi-stage purification process that leverages multiple rounds of diffusion-denoising loops at the early time-steps of the diffusion models, and the integration of Tucker decomposition, an extension of matrix factorization, to remove adversarial noise at high-noise regimes. Consequently, LoRID increases the effective diffusion time-steps and overcomes strong adversarial attacks, achieving superior robustness performance in CIFAR-10/100, CelebA-HQ, and ImageNet datasets under both white-box and grey-box settings. Geigh Zollicoffer, Minh N. Vu, Ben Nebgen, Juan Castorena, Boian S. Alexandrov, Manish Bhattarai |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Topological Signatures of Adversaries in Multimodal AlignmentsabstractMultimodal Machine Learning systems, particularly those aligning text and image data like CLIP/BLIP models, have become increasingly prevalent, yet remain susceptible to adversarial attacks. While substantial research has addressed adversarial robustness in unimodal contexts, defense strategies for multimodal systems are underexplored. This work investigates the topological signatures that arise between image and text embeddings and shows how adversarial attacks disrupt their alignment, introducing distinctive signatures. We specifically leverage persistent homology and introduce two novel Topological-Contrastive losses based on Total Persistence and Multi-scale kernel methods to analyze the topological signatures introduced by adversarial perturbations. We observe a pattern of monotonic changes in the proposed topological losses emerging in a wide range of attacks on image-text alignments, as more adversarial samples are introduced in the data. By designing an algorithm to back-propagate these signatures to input samples, we are able to integrate these signatures into Maximum Mean Discrepancy tests, creating a novel class of tests that leverage topological signatures for better adversarial detection. Minh Nhat Vu, Geigh Zollicoffer, Huy Quang Mai, Ben Nebgen, Boian S. Alexandrov, Manish Bhattarai |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Robust Adversarial Defense by Tensor FactorizationabstractAs machine learning techniques become increasingly prevalent in data analysis, the threat of adversarial attacks has surged, necessitating robust defense mechanisms. Among these defenses, methods exploiting low-rank approximations for input data preprocessing and neural network (NN) parameter factorization have shown potential. Our work advances this field further by integrating the tensorization of input data with low-rank decomposition and tensorization of NN parameters to enhance adversarial defense. The proposed approach demonstrates significant defense capabilities, maintaining robust accuracy even when subjected to the strongest known auto-attacks. Evaluations against leading-edge robust performance benchmarks reveal that our results not only hold their ground against the best defensive methods available but also exceed all current defense strategies that rely on tensor factorizations. This study underscores the potential of integrating tensorization and low-rank decomposition as a robust defense against adversarial attacks in machine learning. Manish Bhattarai, Mehmet Cagri Kaymak, Ryan Barron, Ben Nebgen, Kim Ø. Rasmussen, Boian S. Alexandrov |
ICMLA | 4 |
| 2023 | Distributed non-negative RESCAL with automatic model selection for exascale dataabstractWith the boom in the development of computer hardware and software, social media, IoT platforms, and communications, there has been exponential growth in the volume of data produced worldwide. Among these data, relational datasets are growing in popularity as they provide unique insights regarding the evolution of communities and their interactions. Relational datasets are naturally non-negative, sparse, and extra-large. Relational data usually contain triples (subject, relation, object) and are represented as graphs/multigraphs, called knowledge graphs, which need to be embedded into a low-dimensional dense vector space. Among various embedding models, RESCAL allows the learning of relational data to extract the posterior distributions over the latent variables and to make predictions of missing relations. However, RESCAL is computationally demanding and requires a fast and distributed implementation to analyze extra-large real-world datasets. Here we introduce a distributed non-negative RESCAL algorithm for heterogeneous CPU/GPU architectures with automatic selection of the number of latent communities (model selection), called pyDRESCALk. We demonstrate the correctness of pyDRESCALk with real-world and large synthetic tensors and the efficacy showing near-linear scaling that concurs with the theoretical complexities. Finally, pyDRESCALk determines the number of latent communities in an 11-terabyte dense and 9-exabyte sparse synthetic tensor. Manish Bhattarai, Namita Kharat, Ismael Boureima, Erik Skau, Ben Nebgen, Hristo N. Djidjev, Sanjay V. Rajopadhye, James P. Smith, Boian S. Alexandrov |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 5 |