Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ameya Godbole
dblp:213/8024
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 28% Language models and text generation · 26% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
case-based reasoning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs · ICML 2022 Case-based Reasoning for Natural Language Queries over Knowledge Bases · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs · ICML 2022 Case-based Reasoning for Natural Language Queries over Knowledge Bases · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
unanswerable question detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SCENE: Self-Labeled Counterfactuals for Extrapolating to Negative Examples · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
knowledge base reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph reasoning
subgraph reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs · ICML 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SCENE: Self-Labeled Counterfactuals for Extrapolating to Negative Examples · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph analytics › graph mining
subgraph retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over Subgraphs · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
instruction-tuned LLM planning · 0.8self-training · 0.7mask infilling · 0.7counterfactual data synthesis · 0.7semi-parametric model · 0.6k-nearest neighbor retrieval · 0.6adaptive subgraph collection · 0.6case-based reasoning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text GenerationabstractIn text generation, hallucinations refer to the generation of seemingly coherent text that contradicts established knowledge.One compelling hypothesis is that hallucinations occur when a language model is given a generation task outside its parametric knowledge (due to rarity, recency, domain, etc.).A common strategy to address this limitation is to infuse the language models with retrieval mechanisms, providing the model with relevant knowledge for the task.In this paper, we leverage the planning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs and analyze how planning can be used to guide retrieval to further reduce the frequency of hallucinations.We empirically evaluate several variations of our proposed approach on long-form text generation tasks.By improving the coverage of relevant facts, plan-guided retrieval and generation can produce more informative responses while providing a higher rate of attribution to source documents. Ameya Godbole, Nicholas Monath, Seungyeon Kim 0001, Ankit Singh Rawat, Andrew McCallum, Manzil Zaheer |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | SCENE: Self-Labeled Counterfactuals for Extrapolating to Negative ExamplesabstractDetecting negatives (such as non-entailment relationships, unanswerable questions, and false claims) is an important and challenging aspect of many natural language understanding tasks.Though manually collecting challenging negative examples can help models detect them, it is both costly and domain-specific.In this work, we propose Self-labeled Counterfactuals for Extrapolating to Negative Examples (SCENE), an automatic method for synthesizing training data that greatly improves models' ability to detect challenging negative examples.In contrast with standard data augmentation, which synthesizes new examples for existing labels, SCENE can synthesize negative examples zero-shot from only positive ones.Given a positive example, SCENE perturbs it with a mask infilling model, then determines whether the resulting example is negative based on a self-training heuristic.With access to only answerable training examples, SCENE can close 69.6% of the performance gap on SQuAD 2.0, a dataset where half of the evaluation examples are unanswerable, compared to a model trained on SQuAD 2.0.Our method also extends to boolean question answering and recognizing textual entailment, and improves generalization from SQuAD to ACE-whQA, an out-of-domain extractive QA benchmark. Deqing Fu, Ameya Godbole, Robin Jia |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2022 | Knowledge Base Question Answering by Case-based Reasoning over SubgraphsabstractQuestion answering (QA) over knowledge bases (KBs) is challenging because of the diverse, essentially unbounded, types of reasoning patterns needed. However, we hypothesize in a large KB, reasoning patterns required to answer a query type reoccur for various entities in their respective subgraph neighborhoods. Leveraging this structural similarity between local neighborhoods of different subgraphs, we introduce a semiparametric model (CBR-SUBG) with (i) a nonparametric component that for each query, dynamically retrieves other similar $k$-nearest neighbor (KNN) training queries along with query-specific subgraphs and (ii) a parametric component that is trained to identify the (latent) reasoning patterns from the subgraphs of KNN queries and then apply them to the subgraph of the target query. We also propose an adaptive subgraph collection strategy to select a query-specific compact subgraph, allowing us to scale to full Freebase KB containing billions of facts. We show that CBR-SUBG can answer queries requiring subgraph reasoning patterns and performs competitively with the best models on several KBQA benchmarks. Our subgraph collection strategy also produces more compact subgraphs (e.g. 55% reduction in size for WebQSP while increasing answer recall by 4.85%)\footnote{Code, model, and subgraphs are available at \url{https://github.com/rajarshd/CBR-SUBG}}. Rajarshi Das, Ameya Godbole, Ankita Naik, Elliot Tower, Manzil Zaheer, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Robin Jia, Andrew McCallum |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Case-based Reasoning for Natural Language Queries over Knowledge BasesabstractRajarshi Das, Manzil Zaheer, Dung Thai, Ameya Godbole, Ethan Perez, Jay Yoon Lee, Lizhen Tan, Lazaros Polymenakos, Andrew McCallum. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021. Rajarshi Das, Manzil Zaheer, Dung Thai, Ameya Godbole, Ethan Perez, Jay-Yoon Lee, Lizhen Tan, Lazaros Polymenakos, Andrew McCallum |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |