Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Surjyendu Ray
dblp:213/8119
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › computational phylogenetics
perfect phylogeny |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient Projection onto the Perfect Phylogeny Model · NeurIPS 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient Projection onto the Perfect Phylogeny Model · NeurIPS 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Efficient Projection onto the Perfect Phylogeny Model · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree reduction · 0.3proximal operator · 0.3moreau's decomposition · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Efficient Projection onto the Perfect Phylogeny ModelabstractSeveral algorithms build on the perfect phylogeny model to infer evolutionary trees. This problem is particularly hard when evolutionary trees are inferred from the fraction of genomes that have mutations in different positions, across different samples. Existing algorithms might do extensive searches over the space of possible trees. At the center of these algorithms is a projection problem that assigns a fitness cost to phylogenetic trees. In order to perform a wide search over the space of the trees, it is critical to solve this projection problem fast. In this paper, we use Moreau's decomposition for proximal operators, and a tree reduction scheme, to develop a new algorithm to compute this projection. Our algorithm terminates with an exact solution in a finite number of steps, and is extremely fast. In particular, it can search over all evolutionary trees with fewer than 11 nodes, a size relevant for several biological problems (more than 2 billion trees) in about 2 hours. Bei Jia, Surjyendu Ray, Sam Safavi, José Bento 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | On the Complexity of the Weighted Fused LassoabstractThe solution path of the one-dimensional fused lasso for an n-dimensional input is piecewise linear with at most O(n) segments. However, existing proofs of this bound do not hold for the weighted fused lasso. At the same time, results for the generalized lasso, of which the weighted fused lasso is a special case, allow more than Ω(3n) segments. In this letter, we prove that the number of segments in the solution path of the weighted fused lasso is O(n2), and that, for some instances, it is Ω(n2). We also give a new, very simple, proof of the O(n) bound for the fused lasso. José Bento 0001, Ralph Furmaniak, Surjyendu Ray |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 3 |