Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Claire Cui
dblp:213/8282
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5422-6468ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 87% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
1.9 | 3 | 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023 Lifelong Language Pretraining with Distribution-Specialized Experts · ICML 2023 GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Lifelong Language Pretraining with Distribution-Specialized Experts · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
complex reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
efficient transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › grounding
grounded reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Lifelong Language Pretraining with Distribution-Specialized Experts · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Lifelong Language Pretraining with Distribution-Specialized Experts · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models · ICLR 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › model-based reasoning
simulation-based reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sparse model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
activation sparsity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
sparse mixture-of-experts |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Beyond Point Estimate: Inferring Ensemble Prediction Variation from Neuron Activation Strength in Recommender Systems · WSDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions · KDD 2020 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions · KDD 2020 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
time-to-event prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions · KDD 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions · KDD 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.7regularization · 0.7neural architecture search · 0.7least-to-most prompting · 0.7layer normalization · 0.7large language model · 0.7language model · 0.7expert addition · 0.7sparse activation · 0.6mixture of experts · 0.6neuron activation strength analysis · 0.5ensemble methods · 0.5latent variable model · 0.4hazard rate function · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Mind's Eye: Grounded Language Model Reasoning through Simulation
Ruibo Liu, Jason Wei, Shixiang Gu, Te-Yen Wu, Soroush Vosoughi, Claire Cui, Denny Zhou, Andrew M. Dai |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2023 | Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models
Denny Zhou, Nathanael Schärli, Le Hou, Jason Wei, Nathan Scales, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Dale Schuurmans, Claire Cui, Olivier Bousquet, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2023 | Lifelong Language Pretraining with Distribution-Specialized ExpertsabstractPretraining on a large-scale corpus has become a standard method to build general language models (LMs). Adapting a model to new data distributions targeting different downstream tasks poses significant challenges. Naive fine-tuning may incur catastrophic forgetting when the over-parameterized LMs overfit the new data but fail to preserve the pretrained features. Lifelong learning (LLL) aims to enable information systems to learn from a continuous data stream across time. However, most prior work modifies the training recipe assuming a static fixed network architecture. We find that additional model capacity and proper regularization are key elements to achieving strong LLL performance. Thus, we propose Lifelong-MoE, an extensible MoE (Mixture-of-Experts) architecture that dynamically adds model capacity via adding experts with regularized pretaining. Our results show that by only introducing a limited number of extra experts while keeping the computation cost constant, our model can steadily adapt to data distribution shifts while preserving the previous knowledge. Compared to existing lifelong learning approaches, Lifelong-MoE achieves better few-shot performance on NLP tasks. More impressively, Lifelong-MoE surpasses multi-task learning on 19 downstream NLU tasks. Wuyang Chen 0001, Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du 0002, Yanping Huang, James Laudon, Claire Cui |
ICML | 7 |
| 2023 | Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for EfficiencyabstractTransformers are central to recent successes in natural language processing and computer vision. Transformers have a mostly uniform backbone where layers alternate between feed-forward and self-attention in order to build a deep network. Here we investigate this design choice and find that more complex blocks that have different permutations of layer primitives can be more efficient. Using this insight, we develop a complex block, named Brainformer, that consists of a diverse sets of layers such as sparsely gated feed-forward layers, dense feed-forward layers, attention layers, and various forms of layer normalization and activation functions. Brainformer consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art dense and sparse Transformers, in terms of both quality and efficiency. A Brainformer model with 8 billion activated parameters per token demonstrates 2x faster training convergence and 5x faster step time compared to its GLaM counterpart. In downstream task evaluation, Brainformer also demonstrates a 3% higher SuperGLUE score with fine-tuning compared to GLaM with a similar number of activated parameters. Finally, Brainformer largely outperforms a Primer dense model derived with NAS with similar computation per token on fewshot evaluations. Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du 0002, Yanping Huang, Daiyi Peng, Chang Lan, Siamak Shakeri, David R. So, Andrew M. Dai, Yifeng Lu, Quoc V. Le, Claire Cui, James Laudon, Jeffrey Dean |
ICML | 13 |
| 2022 | GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-ExpertsabstractScaling language models with more data, compute and parameters has driven significant progress in natural language processing. For example, thanks to scaling, GPT-3 was able to achieve strong results on in-context learning tasks. However, training these large dense models requires significant amounts of computing resources. In this paper, we propose and develop a family of language models named \glam (\textbf{G}eneralist \textbf{La}nguage \textbf{M}odel), which uses a sparsely activated mixture-of-experts architecture to scale the model capacity while also incurring substantially less training cost compared to dense variants. The largest \glam has 1.2 trillion parameters, which is approximately 7x larger than GPT-3. It consumes only 1/3 of the energy used to train GPT-3 and requires half of the computation flops for inference, while still achieving better overall fewshot performance across 29 NLP tasks. Nan Du 0002, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Simon Tong, Dmitry Lepikhin, Yuanzhong Xu, Maxim Krikun, Yanqi Zhou, Adams Wei Yu, Orhan Firat, Barret Zoph, William Fedus, Maarten Bosma, Zongwei Zhou, Yu Emma Wang, Kellie Webster, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Toju Duke, Lucas Dixon, Kun Zhang 0043, Quoc V. Le, Claire Cui |
ICML | 27 |
| 2021 | Beyond Point Estimate: Inferring Ensemble Prediction Variation from Neuron Activation Strength in Recommender SystemsabstractDespite deep neural network (DNN)'s impressive prediction performance in various domains, it is well known now that a set of DNN models trained with the same model specification and the exact same training data could produce very different prediction results. People have relied on the state-of-the-art ensemble method to estimate prediction uncertainty. However, ensembles are expensive to train and serve for web-scale traffic systems. Dong Lin, Zhiyuan Cheng 0002, Lichan Hong, Ed H. Chi, Claire Cui |
WSDM | 7 |
| 2020 | Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event PredictionsabstractCapturing the inter-dependencies among multiple types of clinically-critical events is critical not only to accurate future event prediction, but also to better treatment planning. In this work, we propose a deep latent state-space generative model to capture the interactions among different types of correlated clinical events (e.g., kidney failure, mortality) by explicitly modeling the temporal dynamics of patients' latent states. Based on these learned patient states, we further develop a new general discrete-time formulation of the hazard rate function to estimate the survival distribution of patients with significantly improved accuracy. Extensive evaluations over real EMR data show that our proposed model compares favorably to various state-of-the-art baselines. Furthermore, our method also uncovers meaningful insights about the latent correlations among mortality and different types of organ failures. Denny Zhou, Nan Du 0002, Andrew M. Dai, Zhen Xu 0006, Kun Zhang 0043, Claire Cui |
KDD | 7 |