Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Niva Hazon

dblp:213/9152 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering
0.312018
Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018
Information retrieval
question answering
0.312018
Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018
Information retrieval › question answering
question classification
0.312018
Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unlabeled data · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Implicit dimension identification in user-generated text with LSTM networks
Victor Makarenkov, Ido Guy, Niva Hazon, Tamar Meisels, Bracha Shapira, Lior Rokach
Inf. Process. Manag.3
2018 Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives
abstract
Questions on community question answering websites usually reflect one of two intents: learning information or starting a conversation. In this paper, we revisit this fundamental classification task of informational versus conversational questions, which was originally introduced and studied in 2009. We use a substantially larger dataset of archived questions from Yahoo Answers, which includes the question»s title, description, answers, and votes. We replicate the original experiments over this dataset, point out the common and different from the original results, and present a broad set of characteristics that distinguish the two question types. We also develop new classifiers that make use of additional data types, advanced machine learning, and a large dataset of unlabeled data, which achieve enhanced performance.
Ido Guy, Victor Makarenkov, Niva Hazon, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira
WSDM3