Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niva Hazon
dblp:213/9152
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018 |
Information retrieval › question answering
question classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering Archives · WSDM 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unlabeled data · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Implicit dimension identification in user-generated text with LSTM networks
Victor Makarenkov, Ido Guy, Niva Hazon, Tamar Meisels, Bracha Shapira, Lior Rokach |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 3 |
| 2018 | Identifying Informational vs. Conversational Questions on Community Question Answering ArchivesabstractQuestions on community question answering websites usually reflect one of two intents: learning information or starting a conversation. In this paper, we revisit this fundamental classification task of informational versus conversational questions, which was originally introduced and studied in 2009. We use a substantially larger dataset of archived questions from Yahoo Answers, which includes the question»s title, description, answers, and votes. We replicate the original experiments over this dataset, point out the common and different from the original results, and present a broad set of characteristics that distinguish the two question types. We also develop new classifiers that make use of additional data types, advanced machine learning, and a large dataset of unlabeled data, which achieve enhanced performance. Ido Guy, Victor Makarenkov, Niva Hazon, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira |
WSDM | 3 |