VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Moens
dblp:214/0807
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5707-0160ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 55% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
3.6 | 4 | 2026 | A Review of Uncertainty Representation and Quantification in Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2026 Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | A Review of Uncertainty Representation and Quantification in Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › epistemic uncertainty
credal set |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
ensemble distillation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
predictive uncertainty |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty Quantification · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty modeling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | A Review of Uncertainty Representation and Quantification in Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
model averaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
credal sets · 2.9deep ensembles · 2.0interval models · 1.0dirichlet distribution · 1.0belief functions · 1.0bayesian neural network · 1.0intersection probability transformation · 0.9distributionally robust optimization · 0.8credal-set neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Credal Ensemble Distillation for Uncertainty QuantificationabstractDeep ensembles (DE) have emerged as a powerful approach for quantifying predictive uncertainty and distinguishing its aleatoric and epistemic components, thereby enhancing model robustness and reliability. However, their high computational and memory costs during inference pose significant challenges for wide practical deployment. To overcome this issue, we propose credal ensemble distillation (CED), a novel framework that compresses a DE into a single model, CREDIT, for classification tasks. Instead of a single softmax probability distribution, CREDIT predicts class-wise probability intervals that define a credal set, a convex set of probability distributions, for uncertainty quantification. Empirical results on out-of-distribution detection benchmarks demonstrate that CED achieves superior or comparable uncertainty estimation compared to several existing baselines, while substantially reducing inference overhead compared to DE. Fabio Cuzzolin, David Moens, Hans Hallez |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | Direct interval propagation methods using neural-network surrogates for uncertainty quantification in physical systems surrogate model
Ghifari Adam Faza, Jolan Wauters, Fabio Cuzzolin, Hans Hallez, David Moens |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 5 |
| 2026 | A Review of Uncertainty Representation and Quantification in Neural NetworksabstractEffectively estimating the uncertainty attached to neural network predictions thus becomes essential to improve robustness, reliability, and trustworthiness. This paper provides an overview of various methodologies for representing, quantifying, and distinguishing two major types of uncertainties (namely, 'aleatoric' and 'epistemic' uncertainty) in neural networks. The review covers classical probabilistic techniques such as Bayesian neural networks and deep ensembles, methods from generalized probability that leverage uncertainty representations such as Dirichlet distributions, belief functions, random sets, probability intervals, and credal sets, among others. Additionally, interval-based approaches employing interval models are also examined. We discuss the strengths and limitations of various methodologies and identify promising research directions for potential future exploration. Fabio Cuzzolin, Keivan Shariatmadar, David Moens, Hans Hallez |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2025 | Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in ClassificationabstractThis paper presents an innovative approach, called credal wrapper, to formulating a credal set representation of model averaging for Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) and deep ensembles (DEs), capable of improving uncertainty estimation in classification tasks. Given a finite collection of single predictive distributions derived from BNNs or DEs, the proposed credal wrapper approach extracts an upper and a lower probability bound per class, acknowledging the epistemic uncertainty due to the availability of a limited amount of distributions. Such probability intervals over classes can be mapped on a convex set of probabilities (a credal set) from which, in turn, a unique prediction can be obtained using a transformation called intersection probability transformation. In this article, we conduct extensive experiments on several out-of-distribution (OOD) detection benchmarks, encompassing various dataset pairs (CIFAR10/100 vs SVHN/Tiny-ImageNet, CIFAR10 vs CIFAR10-C, CIFAR100 vs CIFAR100-C and ImageNet vs ImageNet-O) and using different network architectures (such as VGG16, ResNet-18/50, EfficientNet B2, and ViT Base). Compared to the BNN and DE baselines, the proposed credal wrapper method exhibits superior performance in uncertainty estimation and achieves a lower expected calibration error on corrupted data. Fabio Cuzzolin, Keivan Shariatmadar, David Moens, Hans Hallez |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Most likely heteroscedastic Gaussian process via kernel smoothing
Ghifari Adam Faza, Nasrulloh R. B. S. Loka, Keivan Shariatmadar, Hans Hallez, David Moens |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 5 |
| 2025 | CreINNs: Credal-Set Interval Neural Networks for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification TasksabstractEffective uncertainty estimation is becoming increasingly attractive for enhancing the reliability of neural networks. This work presents a novel approach, termed Credal-Set Interval Neural Networks (CreINNs), for classification. CreINNs retain the fundamental structure of traditional Interval Neural Networks, capturing weight uncertainty through deterministic intervals. CreINNs are designed to predict an upper and a lower probability bound for each class, rather than a single probability value. The probability intervals can define a credal set, facilitating estimating different types of uncertainties associated with predictions. Experiments on standard multiclass and binary classification tasks demonstrate that the proposed CreINNs can achieve superior or comparable quality of uncertainty estimation compared to variational Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) and Deep Ensembles. Furthermore, CreINNs significantly reduce the computational complexity of variational BNNs during inference. Moreover, the effective uncertainty quantification of CreINNs is also verified when the input data are intervals. Keivan Shariatmadar, Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Fabio Cuzzolin, David Moens, Hans Hallez |
Neural Networks | 5 |
| 2024 | Credal Deep Ensembles for Uncertainty QuantificationabstractThis paper introduces an innovative approach to classification called Credal Deep Ensembles (CreDEs), namely, ensembles of novel Credal-Set Neural Networks (CreNets). CreNets are trained to predict a lower and an upper probability bound for each class, which, in turn, determine a convex set of probabilities (credal set) on the class set. The training employs a loss inspired by distributionally robust optimization which simulates the potential divergence of the test distribution from the training distribution, in such a way that the width of the predicted probability interval reflects the epistemic uncertainty about the future data distribution. Ensembles can be constructed by training multiple CreNets, each associated with a different random seed, and averaging the outputted intervals. Extensive experiments are conducted on various out-of-distributions (OOD) detection benchmarks (CIFAR10/100 vs SVHN/Tiny-ImageNet, CIFAR10 vs CIFAR10-C, ImageNet vs ImageNet-O) and using different network architectures (ResNet50, VGG16, and ViT Base). Compared to Deep Ensemble baselines, CreDEs demonstrate higher test accuracy, lower expected calibration error, and significantly improved epistemic uncertainty estimation. Fabio Cuzzolin, Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Keivan Shariatmadar, David Moens, Hans Hallez |
NeurIPS | 5 |