Sorting is one of the most basic primitives in many algorithms and data analysis tasks. Comparison-based sorting algorithms, like quick-sort and merge-sort, are known to be optimal when the outcome of each comparison is error-free. However, many real-world sorting applications operate in scenarios where the outcome of each comparison can be noisy. In this work, we explore settings where a bounded number of comparisons are potentially corrupted by erroneous agents, resulting in arbitrary, adversarial outcomes. We model the sorting problem as a query-limited tournament graph where edges involving erroneous nodes may yield arbitrary results. Our primary contribution is a randomized algorithm inspired by quick-sort that, in expectation, produces an ordering close to the true total order while only querying Õ(n) edges. We achieve a distance from the target order π within (3 + ε)|B|, where B is the set of erroneous nodes, balancing the competing objectives of minimizing both query complexity and misalignment with π. Our algorithm needs to carefully balance two aspects - identify a pivot that partitions the vertex set evenly and ensure that this partition is "truthful" and yet query as few "triangles" in the graph G as possible. Since the nodes in B can potentially hide in an intricate manner, our algorithm requires several technical steps that ensure that progress is made in each recursive step. Additionally, we demonstrate significant implications for the Ulam-k-Median problem. This is a classical clustering problem where the metric is defined on the set of permutations on a set of d elements. Chakraborty, Das, and Krauthgamer gave a (2-ε) FPT approximation algorithm for this problem, where the running time is super-linear in both n and d. We give the first (2-ε) FPT linear time approximation algorithm for this problem. Our main technical result gives a strengthening of the results in Chakraborty et al. by showing that a good 1-median solution can be obtained from a constant-size random sample of the input. We use our robust sorting framework to find a good solution from such a random sample. We feel that the notion of robust sorting should have applications in several such settings.

We consider the capacitated clustering problem in general metric spaces where the goal is to identify $k$ clusters and minimize the sum of the radii of the clusters (we call this the Capacitated-$k$-sumRadii problem). We are interested in fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) approximation algorithms where the running time is of the form $f(k) \cdot \text{poly}(n)$, where $f(k)$ can be an exponential function of $k$ and $n$ is the number of points in the input. In the uniform capacity case, Bandyapadhyay et al. recently gave a $4$-approximation algorithm for this problem. Our first result improves this to an FPT $3$-approximation and extends to a constant factor approximation for any $L_p$ norm of the cluster radii. In the general capacities version, Bandyapadhyay et al. gave an FPT $15$-approximation algorithm. We extend their framework to give an FPT $(4 + \sqrt{13})$-approximation algorithm for this problem. Our framework relies on a novel idea of identifying approximations to optimal clusters by carefully pruning points from an initial candidate set of points. This is in contrast to prior results that rely on guessing suitable points and building balls of appropriate radii around them. On the hardness front, we show that assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, there is a constant $c > 1$ such that any $c$-approximation algorithm for the non-uniform capacity version of this problem requires running time $2^{Ω\left(\frac{k}{polylog(k)} \right)}$.

Sorting is a foundational problem in computer science that is typically employed on sequences or total orders. More recently, a more general form of sorting on partially ordered sets (or posets), where some pairs of elements are incomparable, has been studied. General poset sorting algorithms have a lower-bound query complexity of Ω(wn + n log n), where w is the width of the poset. We consider the problem of sorting in trees, a particular case of partial orders. This problem is equivalent to the problem of reconstructing a rooted directed tree from path queries. We parametrize the complexity with respect to d, the maximum degree of an element in the tree, as d is usually much smaller than w in trees. For example, in complete binary trees, d = Θ(1), w = Θ(n). The previous known upper bounds are O(dn log² n) [Wang and Honorio, 2019] and O(d² n log n) [Ramtin Afshar et al., 2020], and a recent paper proves a lower bound of Ω(dn log_d n) [Paul Bastide, 2023] for any Las Vegas randomized algorithm. In this paper, we settle the complexity of the problem by presenting a randomized algorithm with worst-case expected O(dnlog_d n) query and time complexity.