Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kazuki Ishikawa 0003

dblp:214/8864-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9558-2747ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 71% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.622025
Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025
Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
algorithm selection
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.912025
Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space · KDD (2) 2025
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.812024
Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.212024
Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian optimization · 2.4active preference learning · 1.5acquisition function · 1.5latent space modeling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bayesian Optimization for Simultaneous Selection of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hyperparameters on Shared Latent Space
Kazuki Ishikawa 0003, Ryota Ozaki 0003, Yohei Kanzaki, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
KDD (2)1
2024 Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning
abstract
There are a lot of real-world black-box optimization problems that need to optimize multiple criteria simultaneously. However, in a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem, identifying the whole Pareto front requires the prohibitive search cost, while in many practical scenarios, the decision maker (DM) only needs a specific solution among the set of the Pareto optimal solutions. We propose a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach to identifying the most preferred solution in the MOO with expensive objective functions, in which a Bayesian preference model of the DM is adaptively estimated by an interactive manner based on the two types of supervisions called the pairwise preference and improvement request. To explore the most preferred solution, we define an acquisition function in which the uncertainty both in the objective function and the DM preference is incorporated. Further, to minimize the interaction cost with the DM, we also propose an active learning strategy for the preference estimation. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method through the benchmark function optimization and the hyper-parameter optimization problems for machine learning models.
Ryota Ozaki 0003, Kazuki Ishikawa 0003, Youhei Kanzaki, Shion Takeno, Ichiro Takeuchi, Masayuki Karasuyama
AAAI2