We study the common intersection of arrangements of double-wedges. We consider arrangements where double-wedges may be both bowties (which do not contain a vertical line) or hourglasses (which contain a vertical line), in contrast to earlier studies that focused on arrangements of only bowties. This generalization changes the setting drastically, in particular, with respect to all arguments involving the point-line duality. Namely, a point in the intersection of all double-wedges is equivalent to a line that stabs a set of segments S (corresponding to the bowties) while it avoids a different set of segments A (corresponding to the complement of the hourglasses). We show that in this general setting, the intersection of n double-wedges may consist of Ω( n 2 ) interior-disjoint regions. Further, we discuss Gallai-type results for arrangements of segments and anti-segments, and we provide algorithms for computing the intersection of such arrangements with worst-case optimal running time. Finally, we also prove that we can find a single intersection point in almost optimal running time, assuming that 3SUM admits no truly subquadratic-time algorithm.

This report describes the 32nd Annual Graph Drawing Contest, held in conjunction with the 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD'25) at Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden. The mission of the Graph Drawing Contest is to monitor and challenge the current state of the art in graph-drawing technology. This year’s edition featured two categories, a creative topic in which participants visualized a dataset based on the Netflix show Dark and a live challenge held at the conference where participants had to draw a graph on a grid, such that the drawing is k-planar for as low a k as possible. A special feature of this year’s contest is that the submissions to the creative topic were exhibited in the "Norrköping Decision Arena", a room with a circular annulus-shaped screen.

We study the problem of computing the diameter and the mean distance of a continuous graph, i.e., a connected graph where all points along the edges, instead of only the vertices, must be taken into account. It is known that for continuous graphs with m edges these values can be computed in roughly O(m²) time. In this paper, we use geometric techniques to obtain subquadratic time algorithms to compute the diameter and the mean distance of a continuous graph for two well-established classes of sparse graphs. We show that the diameter and the mean distance of a continuous graph of treewidth at most k can be computed in O(n log^O(k) n) time, where n is the number of vertices in the graph. We also show that computing the diameter and mean distance of a continuous planar graph with n vertices and F faces takes O(n F log n) time.

We introduce the $k$-Plane Insertion into Plane drawing ($k$-PIP) problem: given a plane drawing of a planar graph $G$ and a set $F$ of edges, insert the edges in $F$ into the drawing such that the resulting drawing is $k$-plane. In this paper, we show that the problem is NP-complete for every $k\ge 1$, even when $G$ is biconnected and the set $F$ of edges forms a matching or a path. On the positive side, we present a linear-time algorithm for the case that $k=1$ and $G$ is a triangulation.

Abstract A simple drawingD(G) of a graph G is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge e in the complement of G can be inserted into D(G) if there exists a simple drawing of $$G+e$$ G + e extending D(G). As a result of Levi’s Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of G can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles $$\mathcal {A}$$ A and a pseudosegment $$\sigma $$ σ , it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle $$\Phi _\sigma $$ Φ σ extending $$\sigma $$ σ for which $$\mathcal {A}\cup \{\Phi _\sigma \}$$ A ∪ { Φ σ } is again an arrangement of pseudocircles.

We study a variant of the geometric multicut problem, where we are given a set $\mathcal{P}$ of colored and pairwise interior-disjoint polygons in the plane. The objective is to compute a set of simple closed polygon boundaries (fences) that separate the polygons in such a way that any two polygons that are enclosed by the same fence have the same color, and the total number of links of all fences is minimized. We call this the minimum link fencing (MLF) problem and consider the natural case of bounded minimum link fencing (BMLF), where $\mathcal{P}$ contains a polygon $Q$ that is unbounded in all directions and can be seen as an outer polygon. We show that BMLF is NP-hard in general and that it is XP-time solvable when each fence contains at most two polygons and the number of segments per fence is the parameter. Finally, we present an $O(n \log n)$-time algorithm for the case that the convex hull of $\mathcal{P} \setminus \{Q\}$ does not intersect $Q$.

In extension problems of partial graph drawings one is given an incomplete drawing of an input graph G and is asked to complete the drawing while maintaining certain properties. A prominent area where such problems arise is that of crossing minimization. For plane drawings and various relaxations of these, there is a number of tractability as well as lower-bound results exploring the computational complexity of crossing-sensitive drawing extension problems. In contrast, comparatively few results are known on extension problems for the fundamental and broad class of simple drawings, that is, drawings in which each pair of edges intersects in at most one point. In fact, the extension problem of simple drawings has only recently been shown to be NP-hard even for inserting a single edge. In this paper we present tractability results for the crossing-sensitive extension problem of simple drawings. In particular, we show that the problem of inserting edges into a simple drawing is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of edges to insert and an upper bound on newly created crossings. Using the same proof techniques, we are also able to answer several closely related variants of this problem, among others the extension problem for k-plane drawings. Moreover, using a different approach, we provide a single-exponential fixed-parameter algorithm for the case in which we are only trying to insert a single edge into the drawing.

Abstract We study the parameterized complexity of the Bounded-Degree Vertex Deletion problem (BDD), where the aim is to find a maximum induced subgraph whose maximum degree is below a given degree bound. Our focus lies on parameters that measure the structural properties of the input instance. We first show that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by a wide range of fairly restrictive structural parameters such as the feedback vertex set number, pathwidth, treedepth, and even the size of a minimum vertex deletion set into graphs of pathwidth and treedepth at most three. We thereby resolve an open question stated in Betzler, Bredereck, Niedermeier and Uhlmann (2012) concerning the complexity of BDD parameterized by the feedback vertex set number. On the positive side, we obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for the problem with respect to the decompositional parameter treecut width and a novel problem-specific parameter called the core fracture number.

Slanted and curved nonograms are a new type of picture puzzles introduced by Van de Kerkhof et al. (2019). They consist of an arrangement of lines or curves within a frame B, where some of the cells need to be colored in order to obtain the solution picture. For solving the puzzle, up to two clues need to be attached as numeric labels to each line on either side of B. In this paper we study the algorithmic problem of optimizing or deciding the existence of a placement of the given clue labels to such a nonogram. We provide polynomial-time algorithms for restricted cases and prove NP-completeness in general.

Algorithmic extension problems of partial graph representations such as planar graph drawings or geometric intersection representations are of growing interest in topological graph theory and graph drawing. In such an extension problem, we are given a tuple (G,H,ℋ) consisting of a graph G, a connected subgraph H of G and a drawing ℋ of H, and the task is to extend ℋ into a drawing of G while maintaining some desired property of the drawing, such as planarity. In this paper we study the problem of extending partial 1-planar drawings, which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. In addition we consider the subclass of IC-planar drawings, which are 1-planar drawings with independent crossings. Recognizing 1-planar graphs as well as IC-planar graphs is NP-complete and the NP-completeness easily carries over to the extension problem. Therefore, our focus lies on establishing the tractability of such extension problems in a weaker sense than polynomial-time tractability. Here, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of edges missing from H, i.e., the edge deletion distance between H and G. The second part of the paper then turns to a more powerful parameterization which is based on measuring the vertex+edge deletion distance between the partial and complete drawing, i.e., the minimum number of vertices and edges that need to be deleted to obtain H from G.

The problem of extending partial geometric graph representations such as plane graphs has received considerable attention in recent years. In particular, given a graph $G$, a connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a drawing $\mathcal{H}$ of $H$, the extension problem asks whether $\mathcal{H}$ can be extended into a drawing of $G$ while maintaining some desired property of the drawing (e.g., planarity). In their breakthrough result, Angelini et al. [ACM TALG 2015] showed that the extension problem is polynomial-time solvable when the aim is to preserve planarity. Very recently we considered this problem for partial 1-planar drawings [ICALP 2020], which are drawings in the plane that allow each edge to have at most one crossing. The most important question identified and left open in that work is whether the problem can be solved in polynomial time when $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by deleting a bounded number of vertices and edges. In this work, we answer this question positively by providing a constructive polynomial-time decision algorithm.

A strict confluent (SC) graph drawing is a drawing of a graph with vertices as points in the plane, where vertex adjacencies are represented not by individual curves but rather by unique smooth paths through a planar system of junctions and arcs. If all vertices of the graph lie in the outer face of the drawing, the drawing is called a strict outerconfluent (SOC) drawing. SC and SOC graphs were first considered by Eppstein et al. in Graph Drawing 2013. Here, we establish several new relationships between the class of SC graphs and other graph classes, in particular string graphs and unit-interval graphs. Further, we extend earlier results about special bipartite graph classes to the notion of strict outerconfluency, show that SOC graphs have cop number two, and establish that tree-like ($\Delta$-)SOC graphs have bounded cliquewidth.

Label placement in maps is a very challenging task that is critical for the overall map quality. Most previous work focused on designing and implementing fully automatic solutions, but the resulting visual and aesthetic quality has not reached the same level of sophistication that skilled human cartographers achieve. We investigate a different strategy that combines the strengths of humans and algorithms. In our proposed labeling method, first an initial labeling is computed that has many well-placed labels but is not claiming to be perfect. Instead it serves as a starting point for an expert user who can then interactively and locally modify the labeling where necessary. In an iterative human-in-the-loop process alternating between user modifications and local algorithmic updates and refinements the labeling can be tuned to the user's needs.

We study the parameterized complexity of the Bounded-Degree Vertex Deletion problem (BDD), where the aim is to find a maximum induced subgraph whose maximum degree is below a given degree bound. Our focus lies on parameters that measure the structural properties of the input instance. We first show that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by a wide range of fairly restrictive structural parameters such as the feedback vertex set number, pathwidth, treedepth, and even the size of a minimum vertex deletion set into graphs of pathwidth and treedepth at most three. We thereby resolve the main open question stated in Betzler, Bredereck, Niedermeier and Uhlmann (2012) concerning the complexity of BDD parameterized by the feedback vertex set number. On the positive side, we obtain fixed-parameter algorithms for the problem with respect to the decompositional parameter treecut width and a novel problem-specific parameter called the core fracture number.