Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiu-Ling Xu

dblp:215/3633 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 61% Learning paradigms · 30% Autonomous driving · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
abductive learning
0.412019
Bridging Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning by Abductive Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.412019
Bridging Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning by Abductive Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge incorporation › knowledge-infused learning
neuro-symbolic learning
0.412019
Bridging Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning by Abductive Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.112019
Bridging Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning by Abductive Learning · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logic programming · 0.4abductive reasoning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Bridging Machine Learning and Logical Reasoning by Abductive Learning
abstract
Perception and reasoning are two representative abilities of intelligence that are integrated seamlessly during human problem-solving processes. In the area of artificial intelligence (AI), the two abilities are usually realised by machine learning and logic programming, respectively. However, the two categories of techniques were developed separately throughout most of the history of AI. In this paper, we present the abductive learning targeted at unifying the two AI paradigms in a mutually beneficial way, where the machine learning model learns to perceive primitive logic facts from data, while logical reasoning can exploit symbolic domain knowledge and correct the wrongly perceived facts for improving the machine learning models. Furthermore, we propose a novel approach to optimise the machine learning model and the logical reasoning model jointly. We demonstrate that by using abductive learning, machines can learn to recognise numbers and resolve unknown mathematical operations simultaneously from images of simple hand-written equations. Moreover, the learned models can be generalised to longer equations and adapted to different tasks, which is beyond the capability of state-of-the-art deep learning models.
Wang-Zhou Dai, Qiu-Ling Xu, Yang Yu 0001, Zhi-Hua Zhou
NeurIPS2