Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frederick C. Krause

dblp:215/9435 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy systems and smart grids › energy storage
battery technology
0.312018
Energy Storage Technologies for Small Satellite Applications · Proc. IEEE 2018
Energy systems and smart grids
energy storage
0.312018
Energy Storage Technologies for Small Satellite Applications · Proc. IEEE 2018
Energy systems and smart grids › energy storage
lithium-ion battery
0.312018
Energy Storage Technologies for Small Satellite Applications · Proc. IEEE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

technology review · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Energy Storage Technologies for Small Satellite Applications
abstract
Rapid advances in small satellite (often referred to as CubeSats) technology are providing opportunities for space exploration to a wide range of users (in particular universities) at substantially reduced costs. Many of the capabilities provided by larger satellites and spacecraft (>2000 kg) are now available through small satellite technologies. Ongoing improvements in attitude control, propulsion, advanced communications, and scientific instrumentation continue to enhance their benefits, even within such strict volume and mass constraints. With such advances in CubeSat technologies, the power and energy demands have also increased dramatically, necessitating the need for larger deployable solar arrays, lower power electronics, efficient energy storage systems, and even energy transfer/harvesting systems. In terms of energy storage, more advanced battery chemistries with higher energy densities and higher power capabilities over a wider operating temperature range are also a fundamental need. There already exist today numerous commercially available energy storage options suitable for CubeSat applications, although many missions rely on custom designs. Similar to standard satellite design, the selection of an appropriate energy storage system is driven by mission requirements related to power, energy, and lifetime. This paper will provide a general review of performance capabilities of state-of-the-art lithium-ion battery technologies, as well as other advanced energy storage systems for small satellite applications.
Keith B. Chin, Erik J. Brandon, Ratnakumar V. Bugga, Marshall C. Smart, Simon C. Jones, Frederick C. Krause, William C. West, Gary G. Bolotin
Proc. IEEE6