Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Jantos

dblp:216/2188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0007-6066-0931ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 77% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
1.222023
AI-Based Multi-Object Relative State Estimation with Self-Calibration Capabilities · ICRA 2023
Improved State Propagation through AI-based Pre-processing and Down-sampling of High-Speed Inertial Data · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.712023
AI-Based Multi-Object Relative State Estimation with Self-Calibration Capabilities · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
infrastructure inspection
0.212023
AI-Based Multi-Object Relative State Estimation with Self-Calibration Capabilities · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
UAV navigation
0.212023
AI-Based Multi-Object Relative State Estimation with Self-Calibration Capabilities · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle
0.212022
Improved State Propagation through AI-based Pre-processing and Down-sampling of High-Speed Inertial Data · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.7self-calibration · 0.7AI-based pose estimation · 0.7transformer encoder · 0.6kalman filter · 0.6LSTM · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 AI-Based Multi-Object Relative State Estimation with Self-Calibration Capabilities
abstract
The capability to extract task specific, semantic information from raw sensory data is a crucial requirement for many applications of mobile robotics. Autonomous inspection of critical infrastructure with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), for example, requires precise navigation relative to the structure that is to be inspected. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methods have been shown to excel at extracting semantic information such as 6 degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) poses of objects from images. In this paper, we propose a method combining a state-of-the-art AI-based pose estimator for objects in camera images with data from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) for 6-DoF multi-object relative state estimation of a mobile robot. The AI-based pose estimator detects multiple objects of interest in camera images along with their relative poses. These measurements are fused with IMU data in a state-of-the-art sensor fusion framework. We illustrate the feasibility of our proposed method with real world experiments for different trajectories and number of arbitrarily placed objects. We show that the results can be reliably reproduced due to the self-calibrating capabilities of our approach.
Thomas Jantos, Christian Brommer, Eren Allak, Stephan Weiss 0002, Jan Steinbrener
ICRA1
2022 Improved State Propagation through AI-based Pre-processing and Down-sampling of High-Speed Inertial Data
abstract
We present a novel approach to improve 6 degree-of-freedom state propagation for unmanned aerial vehicles in a classical filter through pre-processing of high-speed inertial data with AI algorithms. We evaluate both an LSTM-based approach as well as a Transformer encoder architecture. Both algorithms take as input short sequences of fixed length N of high-rate inertial data provided by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and are trained to predict in turn one pre-processed IMU sample that minimizes the state propagation error of a classical filter across M sequences. This setup allows us to provide sufficient temporal history to the networks for good performance while maintaining a high propagation rate of pre-processed IMU samples important for later deployment on real-world systems. In addition, our network architectures are formulated to directly accept input data at variable rates thus minimizing necessary data preprocessing. The results indicate that the LSTM based architecture outperforms the Transformer encoder architecture and significantly improves the propagation error even for long IMU propagation times.
Jan Steinbrener, Christian Brommer, Thomas Jantos, Alessandro Fornasier, Stephan Weiss 0002
ICRA3